Facebook users fury over 'pre-approved' data leaks

newsguy 0 Tallied Votes 556 Views Share

In March, Facebook proposed that there should be a number of changes to its privacy policy in order to allow it eventually share personal data with 'pre-approved' third party websites. Such information, should you be logged into Facebook and then connect to a third party website, as your name, gender, friends and connections, username, profile picture and not forgetting any content that you have marked to share as per your 'everyone' privacy setting configuration. These pre-approved data leaks are not proving popular amongst Facebook users.

When Sophos to see how popular this chjange might be amongst Facebook users I was expecting the dissenting voices to be loud, but I wasn't esxpecting 95 percent of those asked to say that the changes are a bad thing. The study, conducted amongst 680 readers on Sophos's website and Facebook page, found that only two percent in support of the changes and three percent who did not understand them.

Facebook, of course, points out that only a small number of pre-approved sites will be offered this feature, and users will be given the option to disable the feature. Indeed, in a carefully worded response to the dissent, Facebook insists that it would only offer personal data to "carefully selected partners" and those partners would be "required to provide an easy and prominent method" for users to opt out directly from their websites and delete any cached personal data.

"The results of this poll send out a very clear message to Facebook - its users aren't happy. Most Facebook users still don't know how to set their Facebook privacy options safely, finding the whole system confusing and long- winded," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. "The onus should not be on Facebook users to "opt out" of this new feature but to "opt in" - making a conscious choice to engage, rather than having to make a conscious decision to decline. Once again, it feels like online privacy is being eroded by stealth. Too many websites are chipping away at their members' privacy and security, potentially exposing their personal data to third parties that were never in the equation when they first signed-up for the service. Facebook would be doing its hundreds of millions of users a service if it thought again about this new privacy policy".

Dani AI

Generated

This thread highlights a recurring privacy trade-off: convenience of using a single social identity vs control over where profile data ends up. correctly flags the strong user reaction; is right to worry about less experienced users; and captures the instinct to avoid being "pulled in." The useful takeaway is practical, not political: treat any social-login or site permission as a deliberate choice, not a default.

Recommended actions that reduce exposure without relying on platform promises:

  • Review connected apps and sites and remove anything unused.
  • Revoke permissions that allow third parties to access profile fields, contacts or content.
  • Prefer site-specific accounts (email + password) instead of social-login for services that are not trusted.
  • Limit visibility of profile fields and posts to the smallest audience needed.
  • Use separate browser profiles or containers for social accounts and third-party browsing to avoid automatic sharing via active sessions.
  • When a third party claims to delete cached data, ask for confirmation in writing and check account deletion options on that site.

A few cautions worth noting: defaults matter — opt-out models put the burden on users; promises to "delete cached copies" are not the same as strong legal guarantees; and many people only discover what was shared long after the fact. For newcomers, short step-by-step walkthroughs and periodic audits are the best defenses.

Framing the debate this way keeps the focus on control and consent rather than the specific wording of any one policy change.

Stan Marsh 0 Newbie Poster

I don't wanna get sucked into this.

Afrowall 0 Newbie Poster

I just wonder why they should be leaking people's info. a lot of rookies are on the internet these days.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.