Dell develops Droid

GuyClapperton 0 Tallied Votes 263 Views Share

Dell is going to launch its latest assault on the hand-held device market with the release of a handset called Aero. It's going to be available in the US only but that's a big enough market; it will cost $99 on contract.

It's a move that will surprise many, for two reasons. First, it's based on Google's Android operating system. This is reasonable and as a platform it's overtaking Apple's iOS, leading Apple further into a similar position to the one it occupies in the computer market - a minority system but one in which it has a 100% market share, so the profits remain constant.

The Android system is open to anyone, of course, and this is where Dell might find its greatest strength working against it. It's used to working in a multi-vendor market and doing OK - it sells Windows PCs for goodness' sake - but it's also very well aware that this market tends to carve itself up on price alone.

This is what's behind the company's attempted acquisition of 3Par - Dell wants more of the Cloud, it needs to position itself away from selling low-margin tin. Another Android phone in the market is probably not its best way of achieving this.

The other reason people might be a bit bewildered is that Dell's previous foray into hand-held devices of any description was the ill-fated Axim PDA. Launched directly against Compaq's early entry into the market, the iPaq, the range kicked off in 2002 and fizzled in 2007. It was, yes, another Windows-based PDA just like all the others available at the time, and of course the only way the company could compete in the end was on price.

Which is why the phone is a baffling idea. A company that recognises that it has to move into areas in which it can differentiate itself a lot going into places in which the only possible conclusion is a price war.

Any readers with any ideas as to why this makes sense are welcome to comment!

Dani AI

Generated

Both and are spotting the two obvious reactions: puzzlement that an established PC maker would go after handsets, and optimism that more competitors are good for buyers. Both reactions are valid. The key question is whether the vendor is chasing volume-driven commodity sales or a differentiated opportunity where it can add real, sustainable value beyond the metal box.

A sensible rationale is to leverage assets the company already has: enterprise sales channels, service contracts, global supply and repair networks, and the ability to bundle device hardware with managed services (security, device management, cloud backup). If the goal is to compete on pure price, the odds are poor; if the goal is to sell hardware as an entry point to higher-margin services or tailored enterprise solutions, it can be a defensible move.

Practical checklist for evaluating a handset from a new entrant:

  1. Request a written update and security-patch policy (how many major OS upgrades, cadence for patches).
  2. Confirm carrier/band compatibility and whether unlocked units are planned.
  3. Check bootloader and developer policy (unlocking and third-party ROM support if that matters).
  4. Ask about enterprise features: MDM support, remote wipe, full-disk encryption and VPN provisioning.
  5. Investigate support/repair: warranty length, spare-part availability, and corporate replacement options.
  6. Inspect preinstalled apps and the ability to remove or disable carrier/vendor bloat.

Bottom line: competition is good, as says, but buyers (and IT teams) should treat any new OEM as a service vendor first. Follow 's healthy skepticism: insist on clear commitments for software support and after-sales service before committing at scale.

extremeb 0 Newbie Poster

Good the more competition the better for us consumers.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.