Microsoft Remains a Company on the Defensive

Techwriter10 0 Tallied Votes 472 Views Share

The second Microsoft-Seinfeld ad was released Friday. It had a few funny moments, but once again left most people shaking their heads wondering exactly what Microsoft hopes to achieve. I'm not sure they know. Although they may have a game plan, it's hard for anyone to see exactly what it is.

We know this much. Microsoft has invested $300M on this new ad campaign to convince us that Microsoft (to paraphrase an old Animals song) is a soul whose intentions are good, but is simply misunderstood. Meanwhile the PR machines has sent out some big wigs to convince us that and in its current iteration is working fine. No really, it is.

Microsoft even went so far recently as to mask Vista as a new operating system called Mojave, and showed people's reaction on hidden camera. Apparently, people who claimed they wouldn't buy Vista were wowed by it when they saw it in action under a different name. The blind taste test might work for soft drinks, but there's more to an operating system than a quick taste. Let's let these people live with Vista for a few weeks, then record their reactions. Something tells me it wouldn't be very flattering.

It's gotten so bad in fact, that recently that mega PC maker HP "has quietly assembled a group of engineers to develop software that will let customers bypass certain features of Vista." The article also suggests that HP may even be working on its own OS. Meanwhile, Bill Gates' arch nemesis at Apple just keeps selling products at a blistering pace. AppleInsider reports that a new survey found that while people will be spending less on electronics in general, they will continue to buy Apple products. And one thing that stands out here is that the survey found that 17 percent people who bought an iPhone 3G are more likely to buy a Mac computer based on their experience with the phone. That's a large potential market for Apple computers and the OSX OS.

As though all that weren't enough, TechCrunch writes in an insightful analysis that Microsoft is failing in a big way to understand youth consumers, a market that's coming under the spell of Apple (which somehow remains hip and everything Microsoft aspires to be) and Web 2.0 companies such as Facebook and Google.

In spite of all these external factors, it's important to point out that Microsoft continues to be a tremendously successful software company and an industry force. That said, they are also clearly large and move slowly and the market has forced them back on their heels where they flail futility at the forces changing the face of the business. Seinfeld isn't going to change that. Fancy ad campaigns and PR onslaughts aren't either. In the end, dare I say it, it's still putting lip stick on a pig. To really recover from their malaise, Microsoft needs fundamental change, and for a large company on the defensive, while it's certainly not impossible, it will be very difficult to achieve.

Dani AI

Generated

As observes, marketing won't fix product-level problems. For most people the complaints labelled "Vista is unstable" trace back to drivers, firmware, and third‑party software conflicts—not an inscrutable OS conspiracy. That matters because it means there are practical, local steps that often restore stability without waiting on corporate strategy or ad campaigns.

Practical troubleshooting workflow: make a full image backup first. Boot into Safe Mode to see if crashes persist; check Event Viewer and Reliability Monitor for recurring errors; inspect Device Manager for flagged devices. Update chipset/motherboard drivers and BIOS from the hardware vendor, and either update or temporarily remove older security suites. Run system checks like sfc /scannow and chkdsk /f. If crashes resist, use Driver Verifier only after backing up (it intentionally stresses drivers and can cause BSODs) or run hardware diagnostics and a live Linux USB to separate hardware faults from software issues. Create restore points before any major change.

If fixes don't stick, consider migration paths that fit usage: dual‑booting preserves native performance for gaming but requires careful partitioning and a backup-first approach; virtualization (VirtualBox/VMware) lets the alternative OS be trialed risk‑free at some performance cost. For people already relying on open‑source apps, a clean migration to a lightweight Linux distribution often delivers a simpler, more stable setup than continual patches.

Longer term, staying on an unsupported OS brings security and compatibility risks. For immediate relief, follow the sequence: backup, isolate (Safe Mode/live USB), update drivers/firmware, then choose between repair, virtualization, or migration based on workload.

airbourne 29 Junior Poster

That's too bad that Microsoft is resorting to dummy tactics. I too was really impressed the first time I installed Vista 32 on my brand new custom-built computer (Nov 07). Sadly, the "new and shiny" has worn off and all I am left with is an OS that is kinda shaky, a UI that is moderately annoying and security features I am starting to doubt actually do any good.

I never liked Macs, so if I didn't play video games, I would probably switch to Ubuntu. Half of my installed programs on Vista are open source anyway (Open Office, GIMP, InfraRecorder, to name a few). I still may dual boot, but I'm on the fence on that one.

Techwriter10 42 Practically a Posting Shark

Thanks for the note. You should try dual booting. If you're using a lot of open source tools anyway, you could probably make a smooth transition to Linux. And by dual booting, you could play with different Linux flavors until you find one that suited you. Then you could strip Vista out of the equation altogether.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.