Part of it is done because a lot of services are running as a service account that has admin access with no questions and so any "user" who can interact with that potentially has more rights than they should
Other reasons are that because services have no session like a user would, you need to be careful as to who would be controlling something if a service were to appear on more than one session..
I believe by default vista doesnt allow it, and certainly GPOs are applied in a lot of companies/organisations (unis etc) to prevent any exploitation.
You would need a separate application - as a rule a lot of machines are set so that services dont and cant interact with the desktop, as a result the service wont even run if it has forms in it.
You have to establish some form of communication protocol so that your application running in the systray and your service can talk without being the same thing.
Then as I said you need to change the cell (which has many examples available via google), and you can do it depending on the contents of other cells.. thats up to you
So you put the " marks round the :1 and :2 (to avoid the faces) ? it should work - failing that, you should if nothing else get an error returned from the query
Its possible that doing it in the initialize component section may not be helping, but.. normally I wouldnt use this.MyVideo_Ending, it would just be MyVideo_Ending
Then you needed to mention you wished to do so at runtime. We cant read your mind.
Usual way would be to change just the cell, however, you could remove the column that is wrong, and readd it as the right type, rather than try and convert it.
Then you need to do a heck of a lot of reading about the file format from word in its many versions, as well as a lot on how to write out PDF files.. Both will be a long and hard journey
Well, you could tell it specifically which app to open in, but as a general rule as long as the file extension is properly associated with an application eg, windows knows the equivelent of double click is to open it in something, it should trigger it.
If the above were an exe, you could rely on the computers path to pick it up if it were in say windows or system32 etc, such as notepad. However, you would need to know where the file was before you could start it. Either the computers current directory would have to be set to the directory in question, or you would need to put the full path in your start process command.
TCheckbox is a TYPE, Checkbox1 or whatever is an instance of that type..
You shouldnt need to check that the send is of type checkbox, if you only assign the procedure to a checkbox, then its gonna be one.. and its not the sender you are worried for really - however.. If you want more explaination.. theres a tutorial at http://www.xcalibur.co.uk/training/Delphi2005 (dont be surprised at the 2005, its been updated since then) and you'll find it covers exactly this kind of thing.
You dont have to do each of the test conditions in different ifs, eg..
you can do
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(strAssigneeEmail) &&strAssigneeEmail != "donightreply@dimtpa.com")
{
//
}
However, one thing that does strike me is that in your case above as long as assigneeemail isnt empty and doesnt equal the donot reply address, its going to have added the requester email and the assignee email irrelevant of wether the requestermail is empty or not.
My view?
pseudo code:
If both are not null or empty & assigneeemail isnt donot reply then add them both and build user list..
If that was true and it added the 2 parts listed, that would be it, it wouldnt then go on to do the rest. Which in that case might be ok, but for the single parts you would then have to additionally test which one or neither happened.
For this instance Id suggest some if statements, but Id also create a flag at the top to test if all aspects were set, eg a requester and an assignee. As if those 2 parts are not filled in, your email wouldnt be vaoid anyway.
Your case statement reads like this
test nothing if something_1 is a value then do this if something potentially totally unrelated is a value then do this.. end test..
This isnt what case statements were really designed for..
They are much more..
// WARNING FAKE CODE
Menu option? valid 1-9 get option
switch option
{
case 1 : do menuoption1
case 2 : do menuoption2
...
default : do …
But there are.. type it in and press F1 it tells you and has examples for nearly everything - failing that type it in google! Theres so much information there right at your fingers, if you cant be bothered to try looking for yourself, it seems wrong for you to be expecting others to do it for you.
Yes and no, unless you fancy getting your educational reward (eg school certificate, diploma etc) to us, you need to learn for yourself, we dont do your work for you, we will help you with it. Reading something as simple as what keywords mean and so on, is something you really really need to do for yourself.. You're the one in education after all, not me. I did my bit, and how did I learn? I taught myself, other than its pointless me copy and pasting an answer or explaining it in my own words when you could read it and find it yourself in information you already have.
Thats why you DEBUG it, that doesnt mean the thing didnt compile, it means you step through the code looking at the values as it goes.. Its a very simple and easy way to find out why something like that doesnt do as you expected.
