Microsoft enters social search market with So.cl

Updated happygeek 1 Tallied Votes 414 Views Share

When 'Thefacebook' first launched in February 2004, access was initially restricted only to students of Harvard University where Mark Zuckerberg was a student. Facebook went on to become something of a success, with the social network controversially being valued at more than $100 billion.

dweb-socl Microsoft must have been watching from the sidelines, wondering when and if it could join the social networking revolution; conscious of how it was relatively late to embrace both the Internet and search bandwagons but still able to make more than a little impact when it did. Google limped into the social networking space with Google+, which has still really to make the kind of splash that those in Mountain View would have hoped for. So why would Microsoft think it could do any different, any better?

Truth be told, Microsoft has already been following the Facebook route by going down the well-trodden path of targeting students and restricting the invite only access to those based at universities and schools in the US. Sounds familiar huh? Now it has taken the leap from restricted to global, by launching the to the general public no matter where they happen to live or work. You can, apparently, "share your search and express your ideas" says Microsoft "through beautiful collages of content" which seems to mean that it's aimed at sharing search results, commenting upon them and as a result building a network of like-minded people to interact with.

But it isn't, despite the whole student to global evolution thing, aimed at destroying Facebook market share. In fact, it's a social network that integrates with Facebook and appears to have more to do with bolstering the Bing search brand as competing with Facebook. Indeed, you sign in using your Facebook account (or MS Live ID) and waste more of your time indulging in YouTube video viewing parties and liking the results of searches made by your social circle. It's a way of sharing interests, sure, but if you already share content via Facebook, Twitter or even Google+ then I'm not really sure what So.cl is meant to bring to the party other than an opportunity for Microsoft to claim it has not been left behind by techno-cultural changes. That claim may be valid, but Microsoft cannot make one based upon techno-cultural innovation: So.cl is just the same old, same old wrapped up in different marketing materials. Actually, scrap that. It's the same old, same old but a cut down, low fat and lower usefulness variety of it.

As Eden Zoller, a Principal Analyst at Ovum, says "Microsoft So.cl is not a fully-fledged social network and it is far too early to even suggest it could be a rival to Google+ or Facebook, and the chances are it never will be. So.cl is powered by Bing and is about social search and sharing, with little value add beyond this and no-where near the kind of features offered by Facebook or Google+. If So.cl gains significant traction, which we think unlikely, then Microsoft might well ramp up the service with additional features, particularly mobile where Microsoft can tap into the Windows Phone platform. But for now So.cl will most likely remain an experiment at heart..."

mbkimberley commented: r +0

Dani AI

Generated

This thread captures the typical 2012 reaction to Microsoft’s So.cl: was rightly skeptical that it would displace the big social networks, emphasized its experimental/learning angle, and summed up the atmosphere with a laugh. For clarity now — So.cl was a Microsoft Research (FUSE Labs) experiment that first appeared in late 2011, opened publicly in May 2012, and was discontinued by Microsoft on March 15, 2017. (geekwire.com)

Technically it was a niche “social search” play: the service used Bing search results as a building block and focused on visual, shareable formats (auto-assembled collages, themed “riffs,” collections and synchronous “video parties”) rather than trying to be a full general-purpose social platform. That lightweight, research-first design explains why it felt familiar but limited to many reviewers. (theregister.com)

Practical takeaways for marketers and SEOs who find old mentions of So.cl while researching platform strategy today:

  • Treat vendor experiments as idea labs, not guaranteed traffic channels — they can vanish or pivot.
  • Keep core content canonical on your own site so any short-lived referral source still points back to assets you control.
  • When testing new formats (visual collages, themed conversations, live watch/party features), measure referral UTM traffic, engagement depth, and conversion lift before committing resources.
    These tactics protect ongoing campaigns from the volatility illustrated by So.cl while letting teams test new social formats without risking core reach or SEO.
jovy_WOG 0 Newbie Poster

Hmm.. "exploring the possibilities of social search for the purpose of learning." is indeed a very nice reason for the creation of this experimental research project.

and hey, they created a gray line that differentiates their project with the social networking sites, stating that
"So.cl is not meant to replace existing full-featured search and social networking tools. It is an experimental research project using a minimal set of features which help combine search with the social network for the purpose of learning."

happygeek 2,411 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster

Or, to put it another way: "how can we try and push Bing into the limelight a bit more seeing as we are still failing to make any impact upon Google in the search space?"

jovy_WOG 0 Newbie Poster

:D

That just might be a way to put it, since Google seemed to have benefited from it in a way, why not try it?
I suppose this is what competition can bring to us, end users. A lot of options of which product to use. So if So.cl will indeed be released, no harm done. It's up to us if we want it to be a success or not.

Like what Eden Zoller said, "Microsoft So.cl is not a fully-fledged social network and it is far too early to even suggest it could be a rival to Google+ or Facebook"...

It might do us good at some point, that way Facebook and even Google+ will do their best (enhance some features) to keep their users loyal. See, competition is also good for the health.

antwar1986 0 Newbie Poster

competitors like zombies.. :D

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.