Google Acquires DoubleClick For $3.1 Billion

Dani 0 Tallied Votes 291 Views Share

It's been a couple of years now that Google has been in the contextual advertising game, serving up ads not just in the search results, but also across the network of AdSense publishers. AdSense has since become a dream come true for many small publishers realizing they can make some cash from their blogs and hobby websites.

But when it comes to the largest of the large sites on the web - nearly all of them rely on the DoubleClick ad server to serve up their media-based ads - everything from Macromedia Flash ads to interstatials (the between-page ads CNET is known for) to peel-downs. In fact, it wasn't too long ago when DoubleClick acquired a competing ad server technology, Falk AdSolutions.

So it's no wonder that, after realizing just how lucrative the Internet advertising game is, Google has shelled out 3.1 billion dollars for, not just the technology, but the instant access to exclusively rule the advertising on the vast majority of the web.

The timing is just right, too. It wasn't very long ago that Google expanded its bid-for-placement AdWords system from just text links to banner advertising, and, more recently, some Flash based ad creatives. DoubleClick will expand on the multimedia opportunities of the AdWords/AdSense system.

There's another piece of the puzzle though. DoubleClick has just recently launched a new product which is actually an online marketplace for interactive advertising - essentially something that unites advertiser with publisher but with more traditional forms of online advertising. Certainly something that could be seen to parallel Google's AdSense / AdWords system.

Buying out your competitor is one thing, but should these two companies truly merge, Google would have control of nearly all forms of advertising across the majority of the web. It is yet to be seen how data mining will come into play here ...

Dani AI

Generated

Worth adding a short, evidence-backed hindsight to the thread: regulators and privacy groups made the acquisition a focal point of debate, but the merger itself was ultimately allowed to proceed. Privacy advocates (EPIC and others) filed formal complaints raising the risk of combining search and browsing profiles. (epic.org) The U.S. Federal Trade Commission closed its review in December 2007, finding no basis to block the transaction, and the European Commission cleared the deal the following March. (ftc.gov)

That regulatory outcome shaped what came next. Google kept and evolved DoubleClick’s ad-stack technology and, over a decade later, folded those products into the modern Google advertising brands (Google Ad Manager for publishers and Google Marketing Platform for advertisers). (doubleclick-advertisers.googleblog.com) The practical result was tighter integration between search, display, and programmatic tooling — exactly the consolidation some posters worried about earlier in this thread (see and ).

Publishers and the ad-tech ecosystem responded with technical and operational workarounds to reduce single-vendor dependency and improve transparency. Header-bidding (and the Prebid open-source project) became the dominant publisher technique to put multiple demand sources into simultaneous competition, and industry standards like ads.txt/app-ads.txt were adopted to fight spoofing and clarify authorized sellers. (docs.prebid.org)

Practical takeaways that address the concerns raised by and : maintain diversified demand (header bidding + multiple SSPs), publish and monitor ads.txt/app-ads.txt, adopt a consent/CMP workflow and privacy audit to align with GDPR/CCPA-era rules, and periodically review contract terms and technical tags so revenue isn’t a single point of failure. Those steps have proven effective for many publishers facing the market concentration the original posts highlight. (eur-lex.europa.eu)

Dani 5,664 The Queen of DaniWeb Administrator Featured Poster

Data mining aside, I think the biggest thing to come from this is that the largest sites on the web, who have so far been relatively unreliant on Google - or at least more so than the rest of us - are now among those putting their entire revenue in Google's hands.

Da Programmer 0 Junior Poster in Training

Pretty true. Google is just goin on full throttle in the internet world. Unless somebody stops them , they would surely rule the inetrnet world shortly.

happygeek 2,411 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster

I can't see it doing much for the 'do no evil' image that Google wants us to foster, given the not exactly shining reputation DoubleClick has always 'enjoyed' with regard to privacy issues.

blud 82 Linux Reject Moderator

Hopefully, this will change the doubleclick's policy on internet privacy. :)

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.