Member Avatar for gilgil2

Hi

I have 4 affiliate sites that are all in the same niche and I have bought the domain names mainly because they are frequently searched for terms in google. However to update all four daily would take more time than I have, so I am considering doing a 301 redirect from two of the sites, so I only have two to update.

From a search engine perspective is this sensible? I have not built the sites yet or started building links, but say I built links to one of the ones that I will redirect, will Google punish this site as it is being redirected to another site, even though the names are pretty similar?

If the loss of traffic will be minimal then I will do it, but if I have two sites that are essentially useless in terms of search engine traffic then I won't do the 301 redirects. I do not have much experience of this so any advice is welcome.

Thanks
Henry

  • 4 Contributors
  • 3 Replies
  • 237 Views
  • 1 Year Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by AdamJack

Dani AI

Generated

Short answer: yes — consolidating affiliate domains with server-side 301s is a sensible, standard way to preserve search signals when the move is permanent. Implemented correctly, 301s tell search engines the content has moved and allow Google to forward ranking signals; Google also provides migration guidance and a Change of Address workflow you should use when moving domains. Google engineers have said 3xx redirects no longer lose PageRank in modern crawling. (developers.google.com)

Important caveats. If those extra domains were only going to host near-duplicate, thin or doorway-style pages created to “capture” more search results, consolidating is the right idea — but creating lots of low-value sites to game rankings risks a doorway/ranking adjustment. Duplicate content itself isn’t an automatic penalty, but Google will choose a canonical version; use redirects or rel="canonical" to make your preference clear. (developers.google.com)

Practical checklist (do these before you push redirects live):

  • Inventory and map every old URL to a relevant new URL (one-to-one where possible).
  • Implement server-side 301s (not client-side JS redirects). Example Apache and Nginx patterns:
# Apache (.htaccess)
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?olddomain\.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]
# Nginx
server {
    server_name olddomain.com www.olddomain.com;
    return 301 https://newdomain.com$request_uri;
}
  • Avoid redirect chains and homepage-dumping (map A → C directly, don’t send many pages to the homepage). Test with a crawler (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb) and validate 200/301 responses. Submit sitemaps, add both properties in Search Console and use Change of Address; keep redirects for at least several months (Google recommends a year) and update internal/high-value external links when you can. (searchenginejournal.com)

Quick troubleshooting & policy notes: if you build links to a domain then 301 it, signals normally transfer — but don’t rely on buying or manipulating links to inflate a redirected domain: Google’s link‑spam rules and link‑tagging guidance require disclosure of paid/sponsored links and can trigger manual actions for link schemes. For the practical points already noted by and , use server-side 301s and the mapping/test steps above; to , 301s help consolidate duplicates but also consider rel="canonical" and unique content where appropriate. (developers.google.com)

Recommended Answers

All 3 Replies

Member Avatar for Member #949455

However to update all four daily would take more time than I have, so I am considering doing a 301 redirect from two of the sites, so I only have two to update.

You can read this link regarding about 301 redirected:

http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php

If the loss of traffic will be minimal then I will do it, but if I have two sites that are essentially useless in terms of search engine traffic then I won't do the 301 redirects. I do not have much experience of this so any advice is welcome.

When someone has a new website and replace the old one will need to redirected the old links to the new ones. So the 301 redirected is essential plus it take a few days or weeks to relink the new links.

Member Avatar for dreamcyberdci

When 301 reediect is useful to us ? Anyone, tell me it helps me to deal with duplicate content.

Member Avatar for AdamJack

If you need to change the URL of a page as it is shown in search engine results, we recommended that you use a server-side 301 redirect.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.