I was wondering is it ok to use png's without fear of the dreaded red x?
Dsiembab 5 Junior Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to Post— stymiee 111Just as long as you don't use transparency you will be ok. IE6 and earlier can't handle it without using hacks which are a pain in the butt to use.
Jump to Post— MidiMagic 579Older browsers don't know what a .png is.
All 6 Replies
stymiee 111 He's No Good To Me Dead Team Colleague
Just as long as you don't use transparency you will be ok. IE6 and earlier can't handle it without using hacks which are a pain in the butt to use.
Dsiembab commented: thanks +1
MidiMagic 579 Nearly a Senior Poster
Older browsers don't know what a .png is.
Dsiembab commented: thanks +1
Dsiembab 5 Junior Poster
Thanks for the clarification. I'll just stick to gif's then, thanks again
stymiee 111 He's No Good To Me Dead Team Colleague
Use PNGs. The older browsers they are referring to aren't used anymore so you can safely ignore them. PNGs are superior to GIFs.
kurley4 1 Newbie Poster
The difference is quality!...
PNG's look better, use transparency better but take more space.
Later versions of Internet Explorer have problems recognizing the PNG transparency but GIF transparency usually always shows, but its more pixelated.
Hope this helps
Dsiembab commented: thanks +1
Phaelax 52 Practically a Posting Shark
Depends on the situation. PNG file sizes are pretty good in my opinion and have higher quality. View the link below for fixing the alpha issues with IE6. FF and Safari will display the alpha just fine.
That work-around only works in cases where the PNG was displayed with an image tag, so don't expect alpha to work on images used as table cell backgrounds.
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.