For Microsoft, Ads Trumped Privacy

Updated CatRambo 0 Tallied Votes 677 Views Share

A Wall Street Journal report today suggests that for Microsoft, customer concerns about privacy came a distant second behind ad revenue when designing browser software Internet Explorer.

When Microsoft initially planned the Internet Explorer 8.0 browser, they intended to offer users functionality that would allow them to avoid being tracked online. By design, the software came with its strictest privacy settings turned on - to lose privacy, the user would have to specifically enable the loss. Such settings were considered to be leading the way in consumer protection - most browsers at the time had few privacy settings and did not protect the consumer. Even today, only one browser, Apple Safari, comes with a pre-setting to block all third party cookies.

But Microsoft executives argued that making privacy the default for users would hamper another source of revenue for the company: selling online ads. Leading the way for the argument was Brian McAndrews, a senior vice president who had worked for aQuantive, a Web-ad firm that Microsoft acquired in 2007. McAndrews has since left the company.

When the browser was finally released in March 2009, not only were the default settings not private, but
when a user turned the privacy setting on, it did not persist, but had to be activated anew every time the browser was opened. The InPrivate Subscriptions feature, which would have helped users conceal their online habits, was dropped from the final release.
Tracking technologies are a hot topic lately. Recently a WSJ investigation of the top 50 U.S. websites found that all but one (WIkipedia) installed tracking software, such as cookies and tracking files on visitors' computers.

Dani AI

Generated

This thread flags an important point about browser design: product teams sometimes must balance user privacy against business models that depend on targeted ads. The IE8 episode led to public pushback and, shortly after, Microsoft changed course by adding a list-based Tracking Protection feature to IE9 — but it was designed as an opt‑in mechanism (tracking lists empty and the feature off by default). Readers wanting the timeline and technical differences between IE8’s InPrivate filtering and IE9’s Tracking Protection will find contemporaneous coverage and Microsoft’s own statements useful. (arstechnica.com)

Practical steps for people still working with legacy Internet Explorer builds: enable InPrivate Filtering in IE8 (Tools → Safety → InPrivate Filtering) and, where available, enable Tracking Protection in IE9 and subscribe to a reputable Tracking Protection List. Be aware that IE8’s InPrivate filtering did not persist across sessions without extra configuration, while IE9’s list model was intended to persist once enabled. Follow authoritative setup guides rather than guessing at registry edits. (arstechnica.com)

Those wanting stronger, browser‑independent protection should combine browser features with active extensions. Use Privacy Badger (automatically learns and blocks cross‑site trackers) and a content blocker such as uBlock Origin to reduce invisible profiling; these tools are maintained by privacy organizations and the community. Also note that the old “Do Not Track” header was promoted by regulators as a concept but was voluntary and never universally enforced — regulatory pressure changed how signals and laws evolved later. (privacybadger.org)

A practical caution: aggressive blocking can break site functionality (CDN‑hosted libraries, social widgets, single‑sign‑on flows). Test sites in a controlled profile or use per‑site whitelists. The takeaway from ’s post is still relevant: default choices matter. If a vendor ships privacy controls as opt‑in, users must take explicit steps (or use third‑party tools) to restore the privacy posture many expected by default. (arstechnica.com)

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.