Wii-Tarded: The Peak of Everyone’s Favorite Video Game Gimmick

Glass_Joe 0 Tallied Votes 426 Views Share

At a recent Q&A session in front of investors at E3, Nintendo of America CEO Reggie Fils-Aime adamantly defended the Wii console’s pace to break the record-setting game sale trends of the Playstation 2, claiming that his console is at the “high watermark” of its existence, with software sales numbers topping that of the PlayStation 2, Playstation 3, and Xbox 360 in the current market. Matt Matthews, analyst for Gamasutra, has compiled a data outlook suggesting otherwise, contending that the Wii console has recently reached its software peak.

"[Wii software] appears to have hit a plateau in 2009 with sales inching up only marginally, and falling behind the estimated trajectory of PlayStation 2 software sales."

According to a May 2010 report released by The NPD Group, one of North America’s leading market research companies, Wii hardware sales have increased 44% since May 2009, while software sales are down 29%. Michael Pachter, gaming analyst at Wedbush Morgan Securities in Los Angeles, suggests that at in its current state of decline, we may see an “unprecedented” showing from the console in 2010, with the Wii only moving two software titles per owned console. That’s not the good type of unprecedented.

“Wii software sales were down 29 per cent year-over-year…while PS3 software sales were up 58 per cent and Xbox 360 software sales were up 29 per cent. We think this is remarkable, given growth in the Wii hardware installed base of 44 per cent and growth in the DS installed base of 33 per cent over the last 12 months. In our view, this indicates that Nintendo’s customers either are not finding enough software to satisfy their needs, or need less software than the typical Sony or Microsoft customer.” It’s hard imagining just how or why so many third-party developers fail to deliver a consumable asset to the 70.93 million console owners worldwide when considering the simplicity of the Wii’s top three titles: Wii Sports (63.46 million), Wii Play w/ Wii Remote (27.38), and Wii Fit w/ Wii Balance Board (22.61 million). While the Wii unit sales have clearly shown a massive potential market eager for titles, the third-party developers are failing to cater to them.

Nintendo’s AAA franchises—Super Mario, Mario Kart, Super Smash Bros., Mario Party—have had to take the majority of the Wii’s weight on their shoulders throughout its life span, with first-party titles from Nintendo accounting for 32% of software sales alone. Notice a trend with the aforementioned titles? Owners left to sift through a sea of mediocrity in an attempt to find their next game purchase are left with the smiling brand recognition of everyone’s favorite Guido plumber when ultimately the promise of playing virtual air hockey or pool fails them like the miserable graphics and controls of another poorly produced, poorly executed title looking to cash in on the Wii’s interactivity.

The once highly-touted end all, be all to the holiday season is hitting its twilight in only its third year of existence, which will leave many owner’s stranded with inevitable buyer’s remorse in the years to follow. While its system sales have always been nothing short of phenomenal, a failing supply and demand of redeemable titles are crippling the Wii’s longevity, as well as expectations of what are to come for the console. Instead of building a console around interactivity, they should of built interactivity around the console.Graph courtesy of Gamasutra

Dani AI

Generated

laid out the core problem cleanly: huge install base, weak third‑party follow‑through. That gap usually has less to do with a single failed title and more to do with predictable industry mechanics — and understanding those mechanics explains why the Wii’s software market looked so lopsided.

Common structural reasons: the install base skewed heavily toward casual and family buyers who buy fewer games; motion controls add real design and QA overhead so simple ports often feel tacked-on; mapping traditional controller experiences to gestures is risky and costly; and retail economics plus an influx of cheap, low-effort releases (shovelware) diluted consumer confidence. Together those forces make publishers cautious about investing mid‑to‑high budgets on the platform, even when hardware numbers look tempting.

Practical takeaways for developers and publishers: design for the audience first — prioritize pick‑up‑and‑play mechanics and local multiplayer, but keep a fully functional conventional control option. Prototype core gameplay without motion, then layer gestures where they add real value. Keep development scope and budgets aligned with realistic sales expectations, aim for tight QA on controls, and consider episodic/digital models to lower retail risk.

For anyone revisiting this thread years later: the Wii’s library contains both genuine design gems and a lot of disposable content. Look for replay value, multiplayer depth, and reviews focused on control fidelity rather than gimmicks. The situation describes is a classic lesson: big hardware numbers never guarantee a healthy third‑party ecosystem unless the software strategy matches the audience and technical realities.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.