XP has many more options when you need to recover from a catastrophic failure. I can do so many more things with an unbootable version of XP than Vista or 7. What retard at Micro$oft decided it would be a good idea if you could only attempt a repair install with Vista if your Vista os was bootable and working. A repair install is one of the simpler ways to deal with some xp problems. I have a myriad things I can do, ranging from very simple to ridiculously complex, with any version of XP that is misbehaving, especially when it will not boot in ANY mode. I can, and have dealt successfully with Vista and 7 problems but becasue so little thought was put into recovery from failure in both, it often requires twice the time and effort required to successfully deal with than any version of XP.
And to happygeek, I have worked with every single version of Microsoft OS that has ever been released. I can tell you from long hard experience that so called supported versions of their products are barely more secure than unsupported ones. At the present time I prefer an unsupported os (XP) over Vista or Win 7 because many of the problems that XP was released with have been dealt with and while yes, there maybe more, and ther will be no solutions because of no support, Vista and especially Win 7 are far from having reached a similar level of stability.
…