Threads should remain open as a rule of thumb, and there should be no rule/movement against contributing to those threads at any time provided that contribution is on topic and adds something worthy to the thread in question.
Where the addition is spam/hijack etc then it gets dealt with using existing moderator processes.
Define etc. Does etc include "Me too", "Good code", "Thanks" resurrections, or are they part of the "adds something worthy" form of reply?
jephthah points out, another level of questionable resurrections. In some cases, a post that supplants previously good code with crap. Are they also "worthy" simply because they tried to help?
Here is my biggest complaint. Dani states she wants 'black and white' rules. You can't have b&w rules. What mods need are workable guidelines. If a resurrection doesn't add worth to the thread, what options can we choose from? And yes, sometimes worth is subjective. How do we decide?