The Automaticity of Digital Living

Updated Techwriter10 0 Tallied Votes 457 Views Share

Time keeps on slipping, slipping, slipping into the future...
Steve Miller, Fly Like an Eagle

I've been carrying around that title all week. It came to me on Sunday morning, and it involves the idea of how automatically we record and broadcast our lives in the digital age. One of my favorite illustrations of the automaticity of digital living is the digital camera. If you take a picture of my 3 year old niece, she wants to see it immediately. Think about that for a second. She recognizes at 3 that she can immediately see the picture. Just a generation ago when my 18 year old daughter was born, that wasn't possible. As recently as the 1990s, we were still using film, but with a blink of an eye the digital age was upon us.

Yet the digital camera was just the tip of the digital iceberg. Today, we have affordable smart phones, and with that we have social networking, and we can broadcast our lives without so much as a thought. A decade ago, this type of broadcasting was unthinkable. As recently as 5 years ago, the technological underpinnings were in place, yet most of us couldn't afford the equipment to do it. Today, with advent of more sophisticated mobile networks cheap phones, and app stores; it has all come together and we can publish and broadcast with the touch of a finger.Cell Phones/Smart Phones

Part of that automaticity is the idea of always being reachable. Up until about 15 years ago, you had two separate lives. You went to work and you came home and in between, you weren't reachable. Simple as that. As the 90s closed, that changed as more and more people carried cell phones in their pockets. Suddenly we were always reachable and the lines between work and home and getting to and from those places blurred until they were almost completely erased.

Somewhere along the way, we developed smarter phones. Not only could we make phone calls, but we could reach the internet. We could get email and we could access web sites and with that simple leap, what was left of those lines of separation disappeared. Yet even while all these developments came together, something even more profound was happening, and that was the evolution of online social networks.

Mixing in Facebook/Twitter/Foursquare/Qik

As Facebook and Twitter grew in popularity, and there were applications to run these services on our phones, it changed the game completely. Suddenly we could broadcast what we were doing, what we were thinking, who we were with and we could even send pictures. Then services like Qik came along and we could also broadcast video instantly wherever we were whenever we wanted.

More recently location-based services have developed and we can broadcast where we are 24 hours a day. This has vast commercial potential, even if it's a bit annoying in its current implementation (see Fourquare: I really don't care where you are ).

It's all right there in Front of Us

The fact is that even though this is a very recent phenomonon, we have no problem publishing intimate details of our lives from minute to minute throughout the day. We do it automatically. We really don't think much about it anymore. Oh, we fret over privacy issues still (and that's a healthy concern) and we, especially those of us who are older, think about the implications of what we are doing to some extent, but it doesn't stop us. It doesn't slow us down one bit. We just cruise along with it riding that wave of the automaticity of digital living.

Photo by Alex Kerhead on Flickr. Used under the Creative Commons License.

Dani AI

Generated

Picking up from ’s framing of automatic digital capture and ’s point about the collapse of separate lives, the central issue is agency: tools make broadcasting easy, but people still control how much of a life becomes searchable and permanent. The stream feels instant and forgettable, yet most platforms retain copies, index them, and surface them later. That gap between perceived ephemerality and technical persistence is what deserves attention.

A short, practical checklist for regaining control:

  • Audit account privacy and app permissions - set default audiences to a limited group and revoke unused third‑party access.
  • Turn off background location or location history for apps that do not need it.
  • Reduce notification noise - use focus or do‑not‑disturb windows so presence is expected, not constant.
  • Separate profiles where necessary - keep a minimal, public professional presence distinct from personal streams.
  • Archive then prune old content periodically - export important data, then delete what no longer serves a purpose.
  • Enable two‑factor authentication and review login activity for account security.

Location features and always‑on sharing do offer real commercial value (proximity offers, quick check‑ins, contextual services). Best practice for services is explicit opt‑in, clear immediate benefit, granular controls, and easy opt‑out. That design posture preserves trust and reduces the friction of "automatic" sharing.

Treat the stream as potentially archival rather than purely transient. Combine simple technical controls with small social conventions - visible offline hours, calendar status, or agreed boundaries at work - to restore separation where it matters. The topic raised remains a live design problem: automaticity is inevitable, but thoughtful settings and practices keep control in human hands.

InsightsDigital 57 Posting Virtuoso

Very good article. I also say that keeping separate lives in this digital age is very difficult and that the ways of living using a manual typewriter wont happen again.

Techwriter10 42 Practically a Posting Shark

Insights:
Thanks and so true. We are not going backwards, that much is certain.

Thanks for the comment.

Ron

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.