Member Avatar for Dani

Does your forum use reputation points? Karma? How does it work? Do you find it is helpful or just sparks unhealthy competition among members?

  • 11 Contributors
  • 11 Replies
  • 183 Views
  • 4 Years Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by jusvie

Dani AI

Generated

This thread captures both sides of the reputation debate. Several members (for example , , and ) describe negative outcomes and removal, while others (, and ) note engagement and creative uses. Those contrasting experiences are typical: reputation features change both signal and social dynamics, so design choices matter more than whether a system exists at all.

Core trade-offs, and practical ways to reduce harm:

  • Benefits: helps surface useful posts, gives lightweight recognition to regular helpers, and can provide signals that assist moderation.
  • Risks: early or visible totals create bias, popularity contests and vote-stuffing discourage newcomers, and negative feedback can cause real social friction.
  • Reasonable mitigations include showing ratings at the post level instead of a single user score, using badges or privilege milestones rather than a public numeric leaderboard, limiting votes per day, and making downvotes require brief reasons or a minimal voter reputation threshold. A decay/forgiveness mechanism prevents permanent stigma for past mistakes.

A short implementation checklist inspired by points raised in this thread:

  • Launch as an opt-in pilot with clear success metrics (engagement, retention, moderation load).
  • Keep initial displays conservative: hide global user totals and show only post-level feedback.
  • Rate-limit and monitor voting patterns; automate alerts for suspicious activity.
  • Tie reputation to verifiable actions (accepted answers, "helpful" flags) rather than raw popularity.
  • Provide transparent calculation, a moderator appeal path, and an automatic decay or reset option.
  • Consider alternatives like team/house scoring (the idea) or badge systems that reward solving hard questions (as suggested by ) without creating a permanent numeric rank.

No single answer fits every community. When reputation is used, it should be modest, transparent, reversible, and paired with active moderation and clear community norms.

Recommended Answers

All 11 Replies

Member Avatar for harishankar

Does your forum use reputation points? Karma? How does it work? Do you find it is helpful or just sparks unhealthy competition among members?

No. I had once brought up this idea in my forum and my users were unanimously against the suggestion (most of them). I also believe that "reputation" is not something that is judged in terms of an arbitrary numerical rating but is a quality earned by a member's participation in a community and needs to be judged individually by the other members on a post-by-post basis. It could lead to prejudices against members who initially earn lower ratings and it would be unfair to judge their future posts in the light of their "reputation" in the interests of all.

Finally I decided not to implement it. It isn't needed on my forum and so I decided that it would be best not to burden the system with needless features.

Member Avatar for «þ»

I had a reputation system for a while, but it was removed after complaints.

Member Avatar for kc0arf

Hi,

I too would like it removed from here. I think it is a distraction from the mission of the forum.

Christian

Member Avatar for Eric HRF

I have the reputation system implimented on my board, but most if not all of my members came from an old ubb board, and have no clue what those green dots are for :)

Eric

Member Avatar for Dani

Hi,

I too would like it removed from here. I think it is a distraction from the mission of the forum.

Christian

I think a little distraction is a good thing. It's the bells and whistles that enrich the community building aspect of the site. It would be rather boring as just a strict Q&A.

Member Avatar for joeychgo

I turn rep off. Its too likely to cause fights and hurt feelings.

Member Avatar for JJ___

No. I had once brought up this idea in my forum and my users were unanimously against the suggestion (most of them). I also believe that "reputation" is not something that is judged in terms of an arbitrary numerical rating but is a quality earned by a member's participation in a community and needs to be judged individually by the other members on a post-by-post basis. It could lead to prejudices against members who initially earn lower ratings and it would be unfair to judge their future posts in the light of their "reputation" in the interests of all.

I agree, rep points aren't so good at all. And some people would just go crazy with the power, and then if you allowed only certain people that power, they would be able to put down anyone who argues with them (I've experienced it myself)

Member Avatar for g0rb4ch3v

I have it built in with vB but it is turned off.

Member Avatar for Tom2

I kind of made my own thing... not technical, more social... I made Houses, and to get into them you have to answer a questionnaire... If someone is good, a high-level moderator or admin will award them points, which won't go to them but to their House... It kills two birds with one stone:

  • people that think similarly will be sorted into a House and given a password to their House's special password-protected forum, so that they can all talk together, instead of people that are opposed to them or have conflicting personalities (like the difference between an animal rights activist and a person with a phobia about certain animals) having to talk to each other, in every place you can't escape from someone totally unlike you, for instance
  • Say Joe got 10 points to his House because he reported someone flaming someone else in a post (one of the greatest things about IPB is the little button that says 'Report'). The like-minded people in his House will all like him just that much better because he might have helped them to win the House Cup...
Member Avatar for stevenpetersen

I think there should be a piont system for the people that have the killer hard Q's. But not Q's that are easy like how do you bold font. What do you think.

Member Avatar for jusvie

I had a reputation system for a while, but it was removed after complaints.

Why did they complain? Because they can't spam? :D

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.