Hi, guys!
I'm trying to get a little more from my laptop.
Here is the current configuration:
Intel T2410, 2GHz, 3GB ram (cheap, slow, i suppose), Radeon HD3470, 250GB Toshiba 5400 rpm, 17", Vista Ultimate.

So my question is: what to buy, a 4GB kit of low latency memory, from Kingston (HyperX 4-4-4-12), or a 320GB 7200 rpm drive? Which one would increase best the performance?
In Vista score, the HDD gets a 5.3 score, and the memory gets 4.4, but on a desktop, i found that a faster HDD makes a lot of difference.

Dani AI

Generated

Quick practical guide for and anyone deciding between more RAM or a faster drive.

Short answer: it depends on which resource is being exhausted. Slow program launches and temporary freezes when working with lots of files come from either heavy paging (not enough RAM) or slow disk I/O. is right that extra RAM only helps if you’re actually hitting the memory limit, and a faster drive won’t fix low memory.

Do a quick check before buying:

  • Open Resource Monitor (Start -> type "resmon") or Task Manager and reproduce the slowdown. In Memory, watch Available and Hard Faults/sec. Frequent hard-fault spikes while you work indicate paging to disk — add RAM.

  • In the Disk/Performance view, watch % Disk Time and Average Response Time while launching Photoshop or opening large files. Sustained high disk activity or response times (response time consistently above ~20 ms on a mechanical drive) points to a disk bottleneck.

  • Check free space (keep ~10-20% free) and fragmentation on a mechanical drive. Confirm OS bitness — a 32-bit OS cannot use all of 4 GB without switching to 64-bit — and verify the laptop’s maximum supported RAM before buying.

Rule of thumb and practical tips: if you see heavy paging, buy RAM; if the disk is saturated, upgrade the drive. Today an SSD delivers the biggest perceptible speed boost, but a faster 7200 RPM drive helps too. For Photoshop, capacity matters more than tight memory timings; set Photoshop’s scratch disk to the fastest drive, reduce history states, and close other memory-hungry apps.

Cautions: back up or clone the disk before swapping drives, confirm module and drive compatibility with your model, and avoid trying to overclock a laptop (heat and power limits). Run the quick checks above and you’ll know which upgrade gives the best return.

Recommended Answers

All 2 Replies

I doubt either would make a noticeable difference.

Is your version of Vista 64bit? If not then IMO 3GB is ample.
I upgraded from 2GB Kingston (apparently cheap) to 4GB Crucial Ballistix. There is a slight difference in games (Mostly GTA), but boot up time and general usage no improvement.

HDD wise, I would only upgrade if you are nearing capacity.

Again IMO, save your money and if you feel up to it, read up on overclocking your CPU.

HTH

Like i said, that's the configuration of my laptop. Thanks for the answer, but it's still far from what i expected. I'm thinking of one of the two because I use programs like photoshop and microsoft expression, and it takes long to launch them, and if handling many files, there are some times the system doesn't respond. I know on 32bit system I only have 3.2, but it's not a problem. I don't use the whole 3Gb anyway, but speed would make a difference.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.