Longhorn Reloaded R.I.P

happygeek 1 594 Views

Were you one of the many, and the chances are that being a reader of Inside Edge dumps you squarely into the informed geek category (and there really is no offense meant in that remark, says a fellow informed geek), who mourned the passing of promised core parts of Longhorn such as WinFS when Vista finally emerged?

If you shed a tear then, perhaps you might want to get the big box of tissues out again. This is not going to be a good news day for you.

It has come to my attention that attempts to revive a version of Vista, complete with WinFS, have been shot through the head by the Microsoft legal machine.

It should come as no real surprise that the Longhorn Reloaded project is officially dead. “To put the projects aims simply, we aim to finish off what Microsoft started before the operating system was canceled. It is a modification of Windows 6.0.4074, which was originally released during the 2004 Windows Hardware Engineers Conference” says the project blurb. It was doomed to failure from the get go.

Did anyone seriously think that Microsoft would allow an early Vista Beta to be promoted, distributed and lauded?

Of course not.

Doesn’t stop me from applauding the effort to take this build and build upon though, not least because it would have been nothing short of a miracle if the Longhorn Reloaded project could succeed given that it had no access to the Microsoft source code.

It didn’t stop 25000 knowledgeable nerds from downloading the Milestone 1 release either.

So why am I writing about this, why do I even care? Because, friends, I do actually care about the future of the Windows OS as surprising as that might sound to those of you who have read myriad slagging posts of mine over the years. Removing WinFS from Vista was, in my not at all humble opinion, one of the biggest mistakes Microsoft has made with regard to OS development. Forget the fact that it looks likely to be available at some point in some form as an add-on for SQL Server, it’s the fact that it is not going to be integrated into the Windows OS development tree that sucks elephants through a straw.

25000 people are like a spit in the sea to Microsoft, but I have this admittedly forlorn hope that perhaps it could spike a revolt amongst the Redmond Campus Nerds Association who might just slip WinFS back in unnoticed as part of a forthcoming Windows Update…

Dani AI

Generated

As notes, the Longhorn Reloaded effort to resurrect early Longhorn/Vista builds and keep WinFS alive has been abandoned. That outcome is unfortunate but predictable: projects that depend on redistributing and reworking proprietary pre-release builds are legally and practically fragile. The bigger takeaway is not the project's end but what WinFS represented and why people cared.

WinFS was an attempt to change how the OS treats data: think typed items, rich properties and explicit relationships rather than only folders and filenames. That design would let the shell and apps answer queries like "show all invoices for customer X" across locations, and would surface relationships between items (documents, contacts, calendar entries). The engineering and integration burden for that kind of SQL-backed, metadata-first layer was huge, and during the Longhorn/Vista reset many ambitious components were cut for stability and schedule reasons.

For anyone who wants WinFS-style capabilities today, practical alternatives exist and are safer than chasing leaked betas. Advice:

  1. Use the OS indexing/property system and author property handlers or metadata extractors for your file types so search can expose richer results.
  2. Adopt a document-management or desktop-indexer that maintains its own relational metadata store and offers faceted search.
  3. For a custom solution, build a small metadata service: watch the filesystem, extract metadata with parsers/IFilters, normalize into a relational schema (SQLite/SQL Server), and expose search via SQL or a simple API.
  4. If you still have archived Milestone builds, run them only in isolated VMs and offline — they lack security fixes and drivers and carry legal and security risks.

Treat Longhorn Reloaded as a historical curiosity and inspiration rather than a practical path forward. Focusing on extensible metadata/indexing hooks or contributing to open indexers will produce real, reusable results without the legal and safety downsides.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.

Edit Preview