0

I'm no Microsoft basher, but I've never hidden my personal loathing for Vista. Yet even I was surprised to learn this week just how cynical Microsoft appears to be regarding Vista.

It started the other day when a Steve Ballmer speech to the Microsoft MVPs leaked out. According to several news sources including this one from ArsTechnica, Ballmer called Vista "a work in progress" at a Microsoft MVP meeting. Well, I could have told you that. It's slow, annoying and smacks of a less than stellar effort by the Microsoft development team, but people have paid big money for this OS and they have a right to a product that's not in progress, but one that's ready to go from Day 1.

To be fair, according to Char James-Tanny, a Microsoft Help MVP who was there, most folks, in her view, weren't buzzing about this comment after the speech. In fact, she says she was impressed with Ballmer's energy and after seeing Vista in use all week, saw Ballmer's comment in a more positive light, that there would be more changes and improvements on the way.

Maybe so, but it certainly didn't help the cause when an internal Vista sales motivational video leaked the other day and was posted on YouTube. The video, which is supposed to be a spoof on Bruce Springsteen's 1984 Dancing in the Dark video makes fun of Microsoft Sales messages. Not only is it cheesy, and it spoofs a video that's 25 years old, it shows that Microsoft knows its own sales messages are bull, something we all knew all along, but we don't expect to hear, you know, from the vendor.

All of this comes on the heels of Google announcing its partnership with Salesforce.com, an announcement that stole the thunder of the MVP conference. Then Microsoft shoots itself in the foot with these leaks. You would think corporations would have learned by now, that all this stuff gets out eventually and when it does, it doesn't look very good. In this case, it proves what I've always suspected, that Microsoft knew Vista was a dog from Day 1, but with so many years invested, they had little choice but to put on a happy face and release it. It's only now that we see that even they didn't believe their own hype.

5
Contributors
5
Replies
6
Views
9 Years
Discussion Span
Last Post by Techwriter10
0

hmm. Vista performs well, is rock stable, and gives no headaches whatsoever.
And like everyone who claims "I'm no Microsoft basher" you're exactly that.

EVERY piece of software is a work in progress, kid.
If Microsoft were to state that it's complete, there is no need for further updates, you'd be up in arms screaming that "Microsoft is abandoning customers". In fact people were screaming that already when Microsoft stopped support on Windows 98 a decade after it was released, and when there were 2 replacement products on the market.
Can't have it all kid. Either it's a work in progress or it's end of life.

0

There is work in progress and there is beta-stage. Let's not forget XP and amount of change it went through from SP0 to SP2. Suffice to say that some device drivers (like motherboard and video drivers) need XP to be SP1 or 2 in order to work at all. In other words, SP0 was useless and should not have been released so soon. The fact is that the customers are regarded as paying beta-testers.


Now, imagine the car manufacturers behaving like that. Scary, isn't it?

0

Every piece of software is indeed a work in progress.
-HOWEVER-
It depends at what stage of the work is the software released as "working".
There are two philosophies at work - "release now, patch later" and "protract the release, but, for goodness sake, let it work". MS usually follows the first one. Buggy/no drivers? Fix later. Security holes? Fix later.

Then, there is the third one - "release as-is, but at least don't claim it's ready". Open source usually follows that.
wine (the *adapter* - compatibility layer if you prefer the technical term - for 'doze programs for Linux) for example - has been in the works for, say, 15 years, and is just now preparing for a 1.0 release. By MS criteria it should be 4.0 at least.

I think I'm gonna skip Vista. If I want roughly the same experience, I'll get a P200MMX and install '98 on top of it ;)

0

Fair enough. Leaked was probably a poor choice of words for the Ballmer part of the piece. The Ars Technica article links to a Seattle Post-Intelligence reporter's blog.

Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.