Microsoft Changes Direction from Yahoo! to Facebook

JonathanD 0 404 Views

In the past few weeks, we have seen Microsoft trying to acquire Yahoo! for some $46-odd billion dollars. They failed.

So, moving on, they are trying to acquire Facebook now. Mark Zuckerberg is standing firm on this one though. They are decisively saying "no" to the acquisition.

Facebook is not seeking to be acquired anytime soon.

With rumors of Microsoft offering anywhere from $15-$20Bn to Facebook.

But what kind of complications would this have for Yahoo! or Google? The primary factor is the data available to the search engines.

Right now, for the most part, Facebook data is confidential and protected from the search engines being able to see it.

On the same side of the coin, Facebook has also joined forces with the Data Portability movement. Of course Facebook will have guidelines and requirements for anyone to access the data and display it, but they have indeed joined the movement.

Microsoft wants access to all that data, but they want only Microsoft to be able to access it. Having access to the Facebook data would mean that Live.com would have more data on specific individuals than any other search engine or platform out there.

This would be a huge leap for Live.com. But do we want that? No, definitely not.

Microsoft needs to figure out some other method to get their digital business going. Stop trying to acquire other huge corporations like Yahoo! or Facebook.

Dani AI

Generated

raises a useful angle: control over social-graph data changes the competitive and privacy landscape, but ownership alone doesn't automatically translate into better search results or unfettered access. The following clarifies the technical, business, and user-facing tradeoffs that were left implicit in the original post.

Social content becomes discoverable in a few, well-defined ways: it can be public and indexable; it can be exposed via platform APIs under strict terms; or it can be hidden behind user privacy controls. Any buyer or partner still needs to handle authentication, API rate limits, token expiry, and the platform's rules — none of which are trivial engineering problems. Relevance gains from social signals also require mapping those signals into ranking features (friendship strength, endorsements, recency), testing them, and protecting user privacy when surfacing results.

From a business and policy perspective, combining large search and social assets raises questions beyond product integration: market concentration, data governance, and user trust are central. Regulators and users tend to focus on whether a single company can use personal data in ways that reduce competition or harm privacy, so partnerships and standards-based interoperability are often pursued instead of outright integration.

Practical checks and guidance:

  • For users: audit connected apps, tighten audience settings, remove or reclassify older posts that should not be public, and enable two-factor authentication.
  • For developers: build on documented APIs, follow OAuth best practices, honor user consent, and avoid scraping private content.
  • For site owners: use robots.txt and meta tags to control indexing and expose structured data for the content you want discoverable.

Bottom line: the core question is governance — who gets to access, how consent is handled, and how competitive and privacy risks are mitigated. Those are the lasting issues that matter more than any single corporate move.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.

Edit Preview