Google and Verizon May be Near Deal on Net Neutrality

Updated Emily Banks 0 Tallied Votes 759 Views Share

Rumors surfaced today saying Verizon and Google are reportedly close to making a deal that could end net neutrality. The reported that the two companies, which have been in talks for close to a year, may reach an agreement in the coming days.

If such an agreement were reached, it would change the face of the Internet as we know it, giving telecommunications companies the ability to choose the speed and order of content delivery. It could mean faster services, but at a price to both the online sites that want their content to be top-priority and Internet users who would have to pay to support the premium services, according to the .

The Federal Communications Commissions has been holding talks on the issue with cable, phone and Internet companies to create an industry-wide standard. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski wants to keep a level playing field on the Internet, prohibiting cable and phone companies from giving priority to one site over another, according to the AP.

Both Google and Verizon are involved in the FCC talks, but this agreement between the telecom giants could undermine the FCC's objective. In a statement Wednesday, however, Verizon said it is still committed to FCC's discussions, according to the AP.

The company said it is "optimistic this process will reach a consensus that can maintain an open Internet and the investment and innovation required to sustain it."

Google has previously seemed to stand on the side of net neutrality. In a statement from earlier this year to the FCC, Google said it supports "a non-discrimination principle that bans prioritising internet traffic based on the ownership (the who), the source (the what) of the content or application".

Upon hearing about a potential agreement between Verizon and Google, critics said a deal could push Google and Verizon further into a monopoly of the market and a deal of this sort wouldn't protect Internet users or competitors.

Dani AI

Generated

This thread tracks the August 2010 flap around a rumored Google–Verizon pact. As reported, early headlines suggested the two were “near a deal” to create paid tiers; major outlets picked that up and Google and Verizon quickly pushed back. TechCrunch collected the initial reporting and the companies' denials, which helps explain why coverage swung between “deal” and “policy proposal.” TechCrunch coverage. (techcrunch.com)

What actually followed was a public, joint policy proposal released by Google and Verizon on August 9, 2010. Their document proposes enforceable FCC authority over wireline broadband (no blocking or degrading, a presumption against paid prioritization), while allowing “differentiated” or specialized services separate from the public Internet and leaving most rules off the wireless side except for transparency. The companies framed this as a legislative framework rather than a private commercial deal; the full blog post and the PDF of the proposed framework give the authoritative text. Google public policy postproposal PDF. (publicpolicy.googleblog.com)

That wireless carve-out is exactly what was hinting at: mobile was treated differently. Critics — including Public Knowledge and Free Press — said the carve-outs and the “specialized services” option could enable a two-tier Internet if carriers shifted capacity into closed, paid channels. Contemporary coverage summarizes both the companies' claims and the public-interest pushback. InfoWorld summary and reaction. (infoworld.com)

Practical note: the August announcement was a policy proposal, not immediate operational change. For anyone following this later, read the original proposal text and watch FCC filings and rulemaking dockets (the proposal itself and the FCC process determine whether any change becomes enforceable). The primary sources above are the best starting points. (docs.google.com)

PCBrown 8 Junior Poster in Training


Check that link out. Google and Verizon are denying the story printed by the NYTimes, but there still seems to be something in the works. It's likely that they will strike a deal regarding mobile internet rather than wired-traffic.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.