why not, were you killed and eaten before you could make certain?
jwenting 1,905 duckman Team Colleague
jwenting 1,905 duckman Team Colleague
why not, were you killed and eaten before you could make certain?
Apply that knowledge :)
That's because we're PRO ;)
bad package names.
unformatted code.
and what do you think is wrong?
I usually just drop a very large nuke on them, turning them into parking lots :)
It's an island in the Indonesian archipelago.
if you're a C++ programmer the concepts and syntax should already be familiar to you.
They're quite similar to C++ (though there are differences in implementation).
Nope. Start with installing MS Office (or another word processor), so you can create your design documents.
What would you consider an experianced programmer?
Someone who no longer has to ask that question.
When you have done some programming at school you're NOT an experienced programmer.
When you've done it full time as a job for 5 years you probably are.
nope. No such thing exists.
If there was a "best for everything" compression algorithm no others would exist.
The very fact that other algorithms do exist and are used proves that there is no "best for everything".
This is a generally true statement.
And even if there was, we'd not just hand you the code. It'd possibly (if it weren't patented) be out there for you to find and we might point you in the right direction so you could find it on your own.
Does online education show a higher rate of success then learning done in the classroom?
Define "success".
If you mean "more people get a diploma", probably.
But that's mainly because the requirements of many "online colleges" are far lower in order to atract as many suckers as they can to spend a lot of money on what's basically nothing at all.
Sign up, take some nonsense "personality test" that has nothing to do with the subject your degree will say you studied for, pay a lot of money, and get a diploma stating you now hold a PhD in nuclear physics, another one in pshychology, and a third in software engineering, complete with fake lists of exam grades and a bogus yearbook.
Far easier than going to university for a decade to get the same degrees, doing a lot of hard study and research, working night and day to prepare for exams, etc. etc.
If however you define success as gaining actual knowledge, they usually suck.
The <jsp:include tag includes the runtime result of executing another JSP into the one it's contained in.
As your page is a static page, not a JSP, it won't compile to a Java servlet, which is what the error indicates.
Make it a JSP and try again.
most "online degrees" however come from no credible source.
And oh, just because something is "accredited" doesn't mean it's any good.
They could just be telling a little sweet lie about it, or have gotten it from some source that's less than strict about whom they grant their accredition to as long as the price is right.
In fact almost all diploma mills have some accredition or other.
no. But when you go to that JSP you immediately create a new session :)
BoxLayout will stretch to the size of the largest component in it.
All layout managers generally behave like that (or similar).
And do realise that there is no such thing as a section header ("[xxxxx]") in a Java Properties file so those parts won't be persisted (in fact you can't even add them to a Properties object).
Some hot PETA chick
contradiction in terms.
Anyone associated with PETA is a nutcase, and nutcases aren't hot (however they may look), they're nuts.
^What :O? Is that not illegal? Are they even of any value?
in many countries it is illegal. And in many others it is not itself illegal but using the "diplomas" handed out by them as proof of education is illegal.
If you're older than about 14 years of age that report will be considered (or should be considered) too short by your teachers.
I'm not going to read it, but that's just going on the size of the thing.
no, how to not code before you know what to code...
how about doing your own research rather than sitting there waiting for others to do it for you?
It's your homework, not ours.
on the radio here someone joked a few weeks ago that PETA would get quite upset on hearing that a woman shaved her pussy...
I will settle for 24 hours without pain and without irrate customers.
especially since he revives a zombie thread from a year ago to post his demand for "zuh koduz".
that's not JSP, that's what we wrote in servlets around 1998 and quit writing when JSP 0.9 came around a year later.
Noone in his right mind does things like that any more.
It is rubbish. It is fundamentally flawed by design.
If you don't want to hear advice you don't like, don't ask questions.
nope, not in XP :)
Restarting the system hasn't been required since Windows 98.
Merely restart the console session.
think about it.
If all object instances were created at compile time, how could you ever create a program that deals with information the amount of which is not known at compile time?
impossible.
Redo from start.
Not urgent.
Rubbish code.
tell your team leader that you lied when you applied for the job, that you're incapable of doing the work assigned to you, and that you want to be fired on the spot and hope they won't sue you for fraud.
and another idiot insisting on using Java code in JSP.
And rude too, expecting people to open potentially dangerous attachments and read their content, taking a lot of time.
no such thing exists. They're all integrated with IDEs, just like Visual Studio has one integrated for its languages.
JDBC, but not in a JSP.
do your own homework, kiddo.
If anyone were to send you something you'd have "taken it from internet" anyway, so you fail.
Of course lazy kiddos like you deserve nothing short of dismal failure.
for what? For expecting us to help you cheat or for being stupid enough to make your attempts easy to detect?
noone's going to help you with that attitude, kiddo...
LOL: Not where I work -- we have to pass a first grade level math test before we can be hired as a cashier :)
sent mi zuh dumps asap plz!!!
there are experiments with schools where kids are allowed to pick what they want to learn and learn only that.
The result is almost universal: the kids learn nothing whatsoever.
Girls spend all day discussing the latest trendy clothes and makeup, how to become Paris Hilton.
Boys spend all day gawking at the girls in skimpy clothes in summer and in winter (when the girls wear less revealing clothes) talking about which car or brand of sneakers is "kewl".
End result: glassy-eyed supermarket cashiers who can't even add up.
he's not even looked at Oracle's website for JDeveloper which contains literally dozens of tutorials...
nope. You still haven't done what you were told.
And now you're posting reams of unformatted code as well, another mortal sin.
do your own homework.
you should be able to do the entire project in a day or two if you type at a less than glacial pace.
We're NOT going to help you cheat on an assignment you had 2 months for that you can do in 2 days (or any assignment for that matter).
You're either lazy and/or incompetent, and both of those are very valid reasons to want you to fail and fail miserably.
Not urgent. Come back in a few years and try again. Also gives you time to learn all about why you shouldn't SHOUT!!!!!.
Had you done any searching at all you'd have found it quite easily as it's available (for development and testing work, NOT for production use) from Oracle themselves.
Right there on their website is a big red block saying "Featured downloads", one of which is the latest database server, and another of which is the previous version.
I'll leave it up to you to find the site, which is almost certainly the very first one that any search engine would come up with, and should be the first one you try before you even think of using a search engine.
Learn to interpret compiler errors, if you don't you'll never succeed.
And no, we're not going to guess what "error" you're getting. You tell us and we MAY tell you what it means.
just like that. Insert a link, and when you click it it's opened.
There is no magic.
why?
Demonic posession is bad, reposession is good (just ask Leslie Nielsen) ;)