Posts by Troy III

That's because its not a button its a submit control which happens to be rendered to appear like a buton for user convenience sake.

Don't bother with it because it's wrong;
Completely wrong!

have you tried something less complicated

 $key.find(".headerArea").className = "RoundC";
    } else {
 $key.find(".headerArea").className = "NoRoundC";

this would mean that the thread is solved!

you could include my underdot lib

_ = document.getElementsByTagName("*")||document.all;

and use it like:

_[yourRegExp(returnedId)].getElementsByTagName(tag);

(instead of re-coding your project to accomodate jquery syntax)
its common syntax is: _.Id;

All the examples I've seen involve youtube-dl first to extract the physical video file.

how else would you think it would be possible to do anything with it anyway?
You need to have the code in order to be able to transcode it.

http://jsfiddle.net/LgHcN/

Additionally, the JavaScript Original Name was LiveScript.

sorry my bad:
(additionally), the JavaScript Original Name is: LiveScript .

the difference between alert("string") and window.alert("string") is:
an { implicit call to alert function } vs { explicit call to the same }.

You can also call self.alert("string"); top.alert("string"); this.alert("string"); ...but!
They are all the same.

The "alert" function of any window, is inherited through its prototype. Which means that this frame alert is not the same as that frame alert.
That would be the main and deliberate difference.

w3school’s a crap, but it’s seemed like the best free destination for an absolute beginner like that.

The acronym of hyper-text markup language >> should always be written in all caps because it isn't a word, it’s not a name, - it’s an acronym!

Furthermore HTML is a Case Insensitive Language
aNd IT dOesnT cARe!

I don't think Troy ||| was suggesting to write HTML markup all in caps. I understood that he meant that the acronym should be written as HTML not html

Exactly

Additionally, the JavaScript Original Name was LiveScript .

and I really forgot when was the last time I've used the "else if" || "elseif"; syntax.

Similar question exist in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3662412/are-elseif-and-else-if-completely-synonymous . Though i am nt sure about the answer there as one of them suggest else if as else { if(){}}

Sorry to have to say this, but we all know about ‘stack overflow’; thank you!
We are not lazy nor ignorant… we're just members of DaniWeb, and that's why we are hanging here @ http://www.daniweb.com/ while reading your post, not there!

hello guys

hello

i ask question it easy to use html language to web design?

HTML (should be written in "all caps", always!) is what web content is made of. And yes -it's easy enough.

or they have other language that easy to use

not really, HTML is the easiest.

guyz i ask question again they have site that i can learn about html web design??

Yes, there are good starter-pages on learning HTML Design. And you can start here: http://www.w3schools.com/html/ right a way...

I don't understand the meaning of the word "token" in your usage. So I'm not sure I understand the problem you are facing. And you are using that "$" thing, which points that - the best pro:help you could get with this, lies at its lib., official web address.

Yeah, last time I've checked - nothing that cant be done in JS is possible to do with jQuery.

All right ?
(...you didn't get killed on a car accident or something?...)

that's because you are using addeventlistener method assignment on that container instead of a simple onclick or onsubmit function assignments.

The true solution though, is not doing that dynamically.

Would you be accepting JS too, or it has to be a jQuery?

function startEffect() {
//add:
preload.style.visibility='';//here
//and see if it works the way you need it.
        if (mediaType == "img"){...

why is it that it never happens to stick a fork in your eye while you eat?

What do you mean by:

But then I have to make sure I'm not overriding any existing functions, which I think I'm not, but still.

?

Why would that happen ?

possibly a mixed security modes problem

I think that using human format of 0.8 instead of a standard programming: .8 is what's causing the parsing error.

I want the site loading in the iframe to load during the player resizing & opening sequence

Start loading the iframe source before "the player resizing & opening sequence" command is issued.

When the "popup" occurs, my site is still loading in the iframe; the process looks unproffesional.

so you want to look professional..., good! What is your dilemma?

What is this call

mos likely "a picture gallery" (web) app.
(flash free finally)

Can you jsfiddle it, 'cause the code is a bit to ong not pure {javascript} and I am not sure I'm seing it working just by reading it.And and if so mark the thread as solved so that other visitors may benefit?

That's nice
have you seen this:
http://www.daniweb.com/web-development/javascript-dhtml-ajax/threads/415888/if-statement-javascript#post1775237

    <!doctype html>
    <html>
        <head>
            <meta charset="utf-8">
            <title>Grade Calculator</title>
            <style type="text/css">
                body {
                    font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
                    text-align: center;
                }
                form {
                    width: 300px;
                    margin: 0 auto;
                    text-align: right;
                }
                .h-line {
                    background-color: black;
                    margin: 2px auto;
                    width: 100%;
                    height: 2px;
                }
                input {
                    text-align: right;
                }
            </style>
        </head>
        <body>
            <h1>Grade Calculator</h1>
            <p>Enter only whole numbers.</p>
            <form name="Grade Calculator" id="form">
                <p>
                    <label for="test1">Test #1 Grade:</label>
                    <input type="text" id="test1" value="" name="Test #1" size="3"
                    maxlength="3">
                </p>

                <p class="h-line"></p>
                <p>
                    <label for="final-grade">Final Grade (Letter Grade):</label>
                    <input type="text" name="Final Grade" id="final-grade" value=""
                            size="7" >
                </p>
                <p>
                    <input type="button" value="Calculate" onclick="calcGrade();">
                    <input type="reset" value="Reset">
                </p>
            </form>
        <script type="text/javascript">

            function calcGrade() {
                var form = document.getElementById("form");
                var finalGrade = document.getElementById("final-grade");
                var field = form.elements['test1'];     
        var input = field.value, grade, max = 100, min = 0;

        input = parseInt(input, 10)
            field.value = 
            grade = input > max ? grade = max : 
                input < min ? grade = min : 
                input;
            finalGrade.value =
                (grade < 60) ? "F" :
                (grade < 70) ? "D" :
                (grade < 80) ? "C" :
                (grade < 90) ? "B" :
                (grade <=100) ? "A" : "!";
        }
        </script>
        </body>
    </html>

you sohuld make the content fit the iFrame or
use CSS overflow: hidden;
or

overflow-x: hidden

have you tried this?
http://www.daniweb.com/web-development/javascript-dhtml-ajax/code/415096/client-side-image-sizetype-validation-demo

Is there a way to make result=efg?

   var result  = alpha.match("efg");

Or even just remove everything infront of efg.

   var result = alpha.substring(alpha.match("efg").index);

I think that with few adaptations of the existing...
...

sorry, my bad read.

for the real question -it turns out as if
its practically impossible to reuse the browser spell-checker plugin from a page.

...only now I finally get it.
-These guys are simply trying to keep it a Secret!?!

if "menu-item" is a one-liner, you can:
check this : http://jsfiddle.net/8fySf/

It doesn't matter - the best way to accomplish your task, is the way that makes you happy.

Today, you are satisfied with for (var i =0; i< 6; i++); tomorrow, you may not!
But at any time in your life, - if you change your mind, you can come/go back and change it to say
for (var i =0; i< 8; i++); and latter on, -again revert to how it was. Or perhaps even decide to make it more generic and throw arrays that may be shorter or lengthier than 6 by doing: for (var i =0; i < ar.length; i++) and still -it wont matter, because its a scripting language, and that's the beauty of it -your lengthy program doesn't have to be recompiled simply because you decided to replace some "," with a ";" somewhere in its flow.

-It's your call...

Stay Happy!

There are at least about 99% of people who actively think that Java and JavaScript are >>almost<< identical languages, too! :D

p.s.:
The presumption in:

Is HXTML a library of HTML? Do I include an 'XHTML' include file to use XHTML? I'm just wondering how I use it.

question, - is at least tentatively, logical - which happens to be untrue just the same! And it is so -because of a (deliberate) naming confusion added to it, for "marketing" purposes they used to say (huh marketing!) but they both failed.

xhtml is, to say the least, a "Discontinued" and a failed attempt to hijack; Take Over & commercialize the Web Content Creation practice, and make people who are capable of using any Plain-Text-Editor to create marvels (we can everyday see), -incapable of doing so without purchasing their (xhtml coding, JAVA addictive) products, debuggers and so.

The Live Script and HTML prevailed, as good over evil always will...
Well, "most of the time" than.

Stay a happy coder.

I think that with few adaptations of the existing code, the spellchecker can be made to reflect errors on any other content; editable or non-editable.

In fact, ever since DHTML introduction or the day that Gen-4 browsers came out, there's nothing non-editable in HTML. HTML is alive ever since Live Script came to existence, and now that we have DOM we have almost everything we need to be truly productive.

Of course, the dynamic changes will not affect the source - but they'll be clearly visible to the client.

Here you can try this function :

function setImage(targetElement, imageURL) {    
    if (typeof(targetElement)=="string") 
    { 
        targetElement = document.getElementById(targetElement);

        targetElement.style.filter = 
            "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='" + 
            imageURL + 
            "',sizingMethod='scale')";
    }
}

setImage( [arg1], [arg2] );

arg1 - a) image container element or b)its "id"; //format: a) object, or b) "string ";
arg2 - url\image ; //format: "sring" only;

W3C CSS(3) Validator is reporting a parser error on rule (53),** # cover **.
53 #cover Parse Error = 80)

The problem is caused by your

#cover  { 
    top : 0; 
    left : 0; 
    min-height : 100%; 
    min-width : 100%; 
    position : fixed; 
    background-color : black; 
    opacity : 0.800000011920928955078125; 
}

There may be severeal problems with this style but my judgement none appears to be crucial.
consider revising the opacity value from 0.800000011920928955078125, to what will really happen: 0.8,
or opacity: .8;

Another problem might arise by "position: fixed" rule statement.
If parent element has no declared dimensions, the actual element will have to collapse to its parent dimensions which are unspecified; therefore the strict browser will have to either assume 0 dimension or throw a value parsing error, or both.

You are using min-height and min-width which (to say the least) serves absolutely no purpose at all.

p.s.:
TIP: in fact you need to reinstall IE in case you've installed FF or Chrome or Safari on top of it, always and since the earliest ff version releases.

Its a 'soft warning' :: nothing to be really concerned about, - yet:
You are using a wrong doctype ( xhtml ) on a plain HTML document!
That's wrong [!] because you are missleading your current clients and also the Servers answering those requests.

But there is no harm [...] exept for
few extra (wasted) bytes on content transport, like..., 'over and over again'.

In fact beginners require strict and finite rules, otherwise they cannot learn a thing.
Another fact is that "HTML" and "xhtml" are two completely different Mark-Up Languages.

are you having fun yaragalla mural?

Hi i have looked at all the suggested methods. But there is a problem. "display:table" will not work in all the browsers. I mean all the users will not be using the latest browsers. Most of them must be 2-4 years old. So this will not definetly work on all browsers. "inline-height" is not the solutions as my div contains multiple lines of text. so still my problem is unsolved.

here is your universal solution:

<div style="height: 200px; border: 2px dashed silver;">
<span style="height:100%;display:inline-block;vertical-align:middle"></span>
<span style="display:inline-block">This is my book.<br>I am so happy.</span>
</div>

p.s.:
I've been answering this question since years...,
I've answered it here on several ocasions too!

Well, guess what, - nobody even bothered to at least say "it worked"! Let alone "thanks", or mark the thread as solved, etc, etc...

but, who cares? -Have fun!

1. this.Circle();
2. this.Square();

...is the same as if you'd stated:

1. MainMenu.Circle...
2. MainMenu.Square

But the "MainMenu" doesn't have the "Circle" method!
You wrote it for "Shape".
[and this is just to begin with, since there are several other errors on the path]

I wrote you this:

;(function f(){find("skip ad")?getSelection().anchorNode.parentElement.click():setTimeout(f,1000)})();

copy-paste it on the page that needs to skip the ad and tell us how it went.

Can't simplify something, that is not (either) yours nor mine...
What can we say: "remove jQuery - would be a good start" I guess.
After all, it is [the lib alone] most probably 10x larger than the content of the Site itself.

-did I say: most probably?
-yeah, I most probably did! :)

You are correct,
the second dd is the actual dd [object] in fact. The 'first' is its name ['handle'].

Where do you get them back to, or where do you see them reappearing?
p.s.: Facebook >>is a Trojan<< there's no news in that - So, what else is new?