Ron,
I agree with your point that the president's statement was foolish. The president implies that information is a distraction and a diversion. He ignores the key point that the devices he lists (and others that he alludes to) are a means to spread information, and do not control how that information is consumed or how it is interpreted; they only make it possible to spread and view information. In fact, it almost seems like he is personifying these devices, an abstract thing: "Information becomes distracting and a diversion", as if the devices themselves logged onto facebook and posted "Obama wasn't born in America!" rather than a person using the device. Frankly, it is a hypocritical thing for Obama to say, considering that much of his campaign benefited from devices like the ones he mentioned, and that he portrays himself as the 'younger, more savvy president'. I would think it more likely for the opposite statement to come out of his mouth. I'm borderline offended that he said it.
That being said, I have to disagree with you about the Ipad. I don't think he was targeting the Ipad in particular. He was making a sweeping generalization that, while untrue and stupid, was only untrue and stupid because he attributes faults to a device that is incapable of faults...
Just my two cents.