No one has voted on any posts yet. Votes from other community members are used to determine a member's reputation amongst their peers.
10 Posted Topics
 | G+ is still conquering the market, while FB already has its huge market share. Apart from that and the prospects unpreceedable, both social networks help much to gain traffic.  |
| | I've heard all these "free" followers do not help much to monetize your Twitter, and it looks so. Am I wrong? |
| | The thing is that each network has its own advantages and all are promising sources of traffic - thus a bit pricy sometimes. |
| | I believe posting is a great way to be noticed, get backlinks and gain interested visitors. Thus one should avoid spamming, for the quantity should not overcome quality. |
| | FB may be great (at least, the service is working well), but may be not. Consider your aim and the possibilities FB gives you first, then make your decision. |
| | I can only sympathize - clients of such kind are always a disaster. I'd say it's hardly possible to give 25 city names in 20 quality keywords - for the customers do not look for some place in several cities at a time, at least not often. |
| | SEO+PPC+CPA+viral campaigns = good result. Kinda' simple formulae, but it works. Yet there's definitely no common approach towards Internet promotion - each specialist has his/her own tricks. |
| | Yes, it looks like articles were made quite an outdated technique; thus, I haven't heard of any restrictions except those the sites put by themselves. Thus it's not useful to post too many articles when the site is too young, 3-4 quality texts a week will do. |
| | This is when quality beats quantity. Better five PR-high submissions than 100 PR-low. |
| | I actually agree with the previous comment. IE has too much in common with dog poo to call it a "browser". |
The End.