A group of high school students from Kutztown, PA who were charged earlier this month with felony computer trespassing and computer theft have been offered a deal to drop charges. They have agreed to do 15 hours of community service, write letters of apology, and attend a class on personal responsibility.

The students had each been given an Apple iBook to use during the school year. When they found the administrator password written on the bottom of the laptops, they used it to install iChat among other contraband programs. After the school changed the password the students figured out the new one, disabled the monitoring software, and even used the monitoring software to snoop on the administrators.

There was much public outcry from the students' community and on the internet when the charges were initially announced. Many saw the charges as heavy handed, and not motivated by a wish to deter such behavior but out of the administrators embarrassment at having been outsmarted by a bunch of teenagers. Had the students been convicted of the felony charges they would forever have had to check "yes" on forms that ask, "Have you ever been convicted of a felony?"

James Shrawder, the uncle of one of the defendants created a website, , which argued that the charges were overly harsh and should be dropped. Upon hearing that the students had been offered a deal, he said, "It's about as mild as you can go. It's more of a face-saving measure."

Some of the defendants are considering not taking the deal, believing they did not break the law. Their principled stand may, however, be outweighed by the grave consequences a conviction might have. Besides becoming a convicted felon, sentences could include juvenile detention.

Dani AI

Generated

A few practical notes that don’t repeat the thread’s facts but may help anyone who finds themselves in a similar school/IT dispute.

Legal context: school discipline and criminal prosecution are different tracks and the line between them depends on local law and intent. Technical cleverness doesn’t automatically remove legal risk, and public pressure can influence charging decisions but won’t substitute for legal advice. The safest first step is to treat the situation seriously, not casually.

If you’re a student or parent facing charges or an offer: stop using the device (do not delete or alter files), preserve all communications with school staff, and get written copies of the school’s acceptable‑use and device management policies. Before accepting any deal, consult an attorney experienced with juvenile or computer‑crime matters; ask whether the proposed disposition creates a public record, whether it requires admitting guilt, and whether sealing/expungement is possible later. If you plan to contest, request a forensic image of any devices rather than turning over originals so evidence remains intact.

If you’re a school leader or sysadmin: treat admin credentials as sensitive assets—rotate them, avoid placing them on devices, use role‑based accounts and MDM, enable tamper/audit logs, and publish a clear, graduated discipline policy tied to your acceptable‑use agreement. Consult counsel before making criminal referrals; many incidents are better handled through education, restitution, or administrative discipline unless there is clear malicious harm.

As observed, the “left-it-out” argument complicates blame, and as pointed out, monitoring on school property raises expectation questions. Thread starter highlighted long‑term consequences—those are real and should factor into any decision. This is general information, not legal advice; speak with a lawyer for case‑specific guidance.

Recommended Answers

All 2 Replies

and a hefty legal bill (but then, they'd likely not pay for that themselves...).

I'd consider their actions at most to be a civil offense, except for the snooping (which may have been illegal).
If the uni was stupid enough to write down a root password in cleartext on the case of the machine and then expect students (considered the smartest people around in general though I sometimes have doubts) to not figure out what it is I'd say they have to face the consequences themselves.
If I write the PIN to my bankcard on the card and then give the card to someone else telling them they can do whatever they want with it except get money from my bank account it's me who's responsible when they take the money anyway. This is similar.

Personally, I wouldn't have even used the laptops if they had monitoring software on them. If not for the fact that the school owned the laptops, I'd even say it was illegal.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.