I just read a story that the Wall Street Journal is looking into setting up a Linkedin-type social network to compete with Linkedin. They did try to set up an on-line community in 2008 but it has failed miserably. This time could be different. Their initial attempt to set-up an online community was a half-hearted attempt to grab a piece of the social networking explosion. It was originally intended for their subscribers only. However, as NewsCorp owns the WSJ and they are not ones to accept a failure and walk away, I think they will build a robust community that will be able to offer some content that Linkedin cannot. What do you think and would you participate if it is comparable to Linkedin?

Dani AI

Generated

Short answer: a publisher can only beat a specialist network by turning its editorial assets into membership value and solving activation + trust problems better than the incumbents. Building on points from (promotion/feature parity) and (retention concerns), here are concrete, practical moves that actually change outcomes — not just re-skin LinkedIn.

Start with product constraints that favor publishers: curated vertical content, reporter-led communities, and proprietary research. Convert those into immediate value during onboarding (one high-value action before asking for a full profile). Use friction-reducing sign-on, progressive profiles, and a “first‑week wins” checklist so new members see something useful within 48 hours. Seed groups with paid editorial events, invited experts, and a small set of community managers before opening broadly.

Operational tactics to keep activity healthy: require low-friction contributions (comments, one-click polls), run regular editor-moderated AMAs, surface curated job listings tied to articles, and offer premium micro-offerings (reports, live briefings). Prioritize trust: verified identities, transparent moderation, and clear spam controls. Monetize around utility (job listings, sponsored research, ticketed events) rather than banner ads.

Measure what matters and iterate: define an activation funnel (signup → profile complete → join discussion → take a paid action), instrument 1-, 7-, and 30-day cohorts, and run rapid experiments on onboarding copy, email cadence, and seeded content. If growth is slow, widen discovery with public article pages and gated premium features instead of a fully closed garden.

If the goal is to compete with LinkedIn, the differentiator won’t be feature parity — it will be consistently delivered, topic‑specific expertise and events that turn passive readers into repeat contributors.

Recommended Answers

All 2 Replies

Thaks for brining this one up for discussion. I personally have given WSJ online community a try a few times and each time, it did not retain me for the long term. Why? Reasons were:
1. I forgot I even had it.
2. When I did get a reminder - in one case, it was literally a year later, I did update the profile and engaged for that week but I did not find it much value
3. Not much people or activity

I do like WSJ and read its paper. I will give it another try if it provides as much or more than LinkedIn.

Thaks for brining this one up for discussion. I personally have given WSJ online community a try a few times and each time, it did not retain me for the long term. Why? Reasons were:
1. I forgot I even had it.
2. When I did get a reminder - in one case, it was literally a year later, I did update the profile and engaged for that week but I did not find it much value
3. Not much people or activity

I do like WSJ and read its paper. I will give it another try if it provides as much or more than LinkedIn.

I think the keys will be promoting it (I had heard about the original WSJ community but it was not much of a publicity push) and putting extras and functionality in that is equal to and/or exceeds Linkedin

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.