Pregnant Facebook Users Say They Can't Show Their Tummies

slfisher 0 453 Views

Almost exactly a year after Facebook users complained that the site was deleting pictures of them with their nursing babies, now they're complaining that they can't show pictures of their pregnant bellies, either.

The Facebook group "Allow pregnant women to display pictures of their baby bump!!!!" was formed on June 1 but started getting more publicity only in late December. It now has 173 members.

The founder of the group claims that Facebook deleted a non-sexual picture of her pregnant stomach, saying it was obscene. In comparison, however, the woman notes, pictures of non-pregnant women with crop tops that also display their stomach aren't deleted.

It's not entirely clear whether the group is serious or a spoof. Certainly it hasn't gotten nearly the attention of "Hey, Facebook, breastfeeding is not obscene!" which has almost a quarter-million members.

In addition, it seems that the policy, if there is one, is unevenly applied; while some women do report having pregnancy pictures deleted (including the group's picture), other pictures remain.

Currently the "baby bump" page has four pictures, compared with more than 5,000 breastfeeding pictures.

The main Facebook page has no information about whether such a ban exists.

Dani AI

Generated

A short expert note expanding on ’s report and ’s comment: this kind of “baby-bump” removal usually reflects messy content-moderation at scale, not a deliberate policy singling out pregnancy photos. Facebook has faced similar blowback before when nursing and maternal images were taken down; many removals happened after other users flagged photos and when reviewers applied a strict “no exposed nipple” rule unevenly. (theguardian.com)

Why it happens: Meta’s rules distinguish nudity from non-sexual contexts, but the lines are narrow and reviewers (and automated detectors) work fast. Automated classifiers can produce false positives, and human reviewers are given complex, sometimes contradictory guidance—so identical images may be treated differently depending on how they were reported and who reviews them. That explains the uneven application you’ve seen. (oversightboard.com)

Practical steps to get a photo restored or avoid future takedowns: 1) Check your Support Inbox / Account Status and use the “Request review” or “Disagree with decision” flow as soon as you get a removal notice. 2) When requesting review, add a clear explanation (example: “non-sexual pregnancy photo”) and keep screenshots and upload timestamps. 3) If Facebook’s internal review is exhausted and a reference ID is provided, the case may be eligible for the Oversight Board appeal process. 4) As a low-risk workaround, re-post the image with a restricted audience (Friends or Only Me) and an unambiguous caption to reduce automated/flagging risk. (facebook.com)

If many people in a group are affected, collect examples (screenshots, removal notices, dates) and consider coordinated escalation through advocacy organizations or press — campaigns have pushed platforms to clarify rules before. Document patterns carefully before asserting motive; inconsistent enforcement is more often operational than conspiratorial. (theguardian.com)

Member Avatar for InsightsDigital
InsightsDigital 57 Posting Virtuoso

In due time, I betcha that the group/mastermind behind this Facebook group will be known. I smell a hidden agenda. What do you think?

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.

Edit Preview