Class Action Lawsuit Against Google Buzz's Privacy breach

tiger86 0 392 Views

I wish I had gotten this story before the San Fransisco Chronicle or but the truth is they got it before me. A lady in Florida got a team of lawyers to sue Google, the Search Engine firm in San Fransisco, CA for breaching her privacy with Google Buzz. I know Google get's sued now and then but this lawsuit, is, well different.

I'm sure plenty of people were filled with ire about the entire Google Buzz predicament. But Mz. Hibnick was the one who actually took action and hired a team of lawyers to sue Google for breaching several communication laws and most importantly the . I have to give a hand to Mz. Hibnicks lawyers for doing their research and having the guts to go up against Google about Google Buzz.

Mz. Hibnick filed this as a class action lawsuit, so I'm sure others will join her in suing Google, but you have to think about the company you're challenging and how powerful they are. Mz. Hibnick may have not thought of this but Google could easily shut down Gmail in a heart beat. Now I know that there would be a huge uproar heard around the world if Gmail was closed, but how much do you pay for the service? You don't pay a dime and that's how they would get away with shutting it down.

I'm sure that there is some law somewhere that would prevent Google from just shutting down Gmail over night and I don't believe they will close it's virtual doors, but the truth is that they could and if it was in their favor they probably would.

Dani AI

Generated

raised the central concern that drove the litigation: Google Buzz’s auto‑enrollment of Gmail contacts prompted a privacy class action. The lead complaint was filed by Eva Hibnick and the matter was consolidated as In re Google Buzz User Privacy Litigation in the Northern District of California. (thecrimson.com)

That litigation did not go to a merits trial. Google agreed to a settlement that created an $8.5 million fund and the court approved a cy‑pres distribution to a set of privacy, research and public‑interest organizations rather than paying individual Gmail users cash; the court also awarded class‑counsel fees and modest incentive awards for lead plaintiffs. The settlement and the court’s final approval are on the public docket. (benton.org)

The thread’s other worry — that Google could simply “shut down Gmail” in retaliation — deserves a practical reality check. Google’s terms reserve broad rights to change or suspend services, but mass termination of a core product would expose the company to enormous business, contractual and regulatory consequences; the Buzz episode itself triggered an FTC enforcement action that resulted in a consent order requiring a comprehensive privacy program and independent audits. Regulatory oversight, contract terms (especially for paid customers), and reputational risk make the scenario of a unilateral, retaliatory global shutdown highly implausible. (policies.google.com)

Useful context for digital‑marketing and product teams: opt‑out defaults and secondary uses of data are what triggered the backlash and the regulatory follow‑up here. The lasting lessons from Hibnick and the FTC action are procedural — clearer notice, explicit consent for new uses, and stronger internal privacy controls — not that a single plaintiff can force a platform dark. (ftc.gov)

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.

Edit Preview