0

According to a recent TechCrunch article, Microsoft is planning to rename its Live Search product, Kumar, which means cloud or spider in Japanese. What Microsoft needs to learn, and what the Get a Mac ads have captured so well, is that it's not about PR or branding or the name of the products, it's about the products behind the brand. Until they learn that, they are just going to wallow in corporate mediocrity and be subjected to well-deserved ridicule.

Seinfeld Didn't Change Vista

This obsession with the surface seems to go back to last summer when Microsoft decided that the problem with Vista, was not that it was an awful operating system, but that it had an image problem. Microsoft concluded that the way to solve that image problem was to hire a has-been comedian to act as its spokesperson. This smacked of bad idea from the get-go As I wrote at the time in Microsoft Seinfeld Strategy is Pathetic:

First of all, the problem is not just one of perception. A PR blitz suggests that Microsoft has produced a dazzling product in Vista, but the foolish masses have failed to grasp how good it is. All it will take is a funny ad and we all be lining up to get Vista. It's simply not going to work because the problem is that Vista is a flawed product and everyone realizes that.

As it turned out the ads did nothing but subject Microsoft to more derision, and as expected, the ads were just awful as I wrote about in The First Seinfeld Ad is a Dud. After a couple of additional attempts, they thankfully pulled the plug.

Live Search Lags

Now they hope to make Live Search more popular by giving it a new name. You may recall that Microsoft tried paying people last spring to use its service. This strategy successfully drove up the numbers for a couple of months before the novelty wore off and people went back to the more comfortable Google search. If Microsoft couldn't even pay people to use its search, does it really believe that rebranding the search will work?

If this were a new product coming out of the gate, Kumar is a clever name, but it's not new. It's the same old, same old, with a nice new name. PR didn't change Vista's fate and a new name is not going to attract more users to Live Search. It's another lame surface attempt to fool the public into using your products.

Here's a crazy idea: How about trying some innovation. Maybe if you did something interesting and new, and publicized that, maybe the users will come, but if you can't pay them to use the current product, chances are a renaming strategy is going to fail miserably too.

3
Contributors
4
Replies
5
Views
8 Years
Discussion Span
Last Post by Techwriter10
0

quote::This obsession with the surface seems to go back to last summer when Microsoft decided that the problem with Vista

No, it didn't start last summer. Microsoft has always been obsessed with the surface. The difference is that in the past they have been able to buy innovative products they could rebrand, and glitziy. Those days are gone.

0

Hi Tracyanne:

Good point. They have either bought or copied others' ideas. It seems that these days their own lack of innovation has finally caught with them and they are paying the price. And they are trying to cover up or paper this over with PR, ad campaigns and name changes.

0

It's kumo, not kumar.

Not that I can see myself using either one any more than I would windows live anything.

Google understands what people want in a search engine. No flashy graphics, no banner ads, no crap. Just a white page that says "google" and has a textbox to enter search terms. Nobody else seems to get the brilliance of this approach.

0

Oops. That's a bad mistake. Thanks for pointing that out.

I agree that Google understands open web search better than anyone out there.

Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.