Police online crime maps, what a waste of time!

newsguy 0 Tallied Votes 397 Views Share

All 43 police forces across England and Wales have now published crime maps on the Internet, according to the UK Home Office. This means that people can access details of crime in the areas they live in via the neighbourhood crime maps scheme. What a monumental waste of time and resources!

As well as showing where crime is happening, helping to identify hotspots as it were, the maps also plot trends and provide a comparison with the rest of the country. The idea being, so says the Home Office, that the maps will "allow the public to see how local crime fighting partnerships are impacting on issues of local concern and give people the information they need to dictate local priorities." Say that again? While it might be of some passing interest to see information about burglary, robbery, theft, vehicle crime, violent crime and anti-social behaviour in your local area, I am at a loss as to how this is enabling in any real sense of the word. Certainly there seems little evidence that a crime map is suddenly going to empower residents to be able to change policing priorities.

Still, the Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker insists that he is "determined to give people the crime information which, as the Casey Review found, they want. Every single police force in England and Wales now has crime mapping. This gives comprehensive knowledge about crime patterns and hotspots to communities." Right, and that empowerment issue? "By empowering people with this information" Coaker argues "they are able to engage more with their neighbourhood policing teams. I am sure this will lead to an even more responsive and effective police, thoroughly in tune with people’s needs."

with his assertion that crime mapping can "help ensure people’s voices are heard when police set crime fighting priorities." Neil Rhodes, deputy chief constable of Lincolnshire and Association of Chief Police Officers lead on crime mapping, rather unsurprisingly does. He told us that "for many years, all forces have mapped crimes and incidents to help them focus investigations, analyse hot spots and tackle crime vigorously. The information now on the forces’ websites has a different more community-focused perspective and means the public can now look at crime levels in their community simply by putting their postcode into their local police force’s website."

Nottinghamshire police chief constable Julia Hodson said, ‘As a Nottinghamshire resident, I typed in my own postcode and was very encouraged by what I read" but then again I suspect she does not live in a tower block with drug dealers living next door. Maybe less time tinkering with maps and more Bobbies on the beat might help even more. Indeed, leave the Google Map Mashups to things that can actually make a difference like the Google Flu thing.

Dani AI

Generated

’s headline view captures a common first reaction: early neighbourhood crime maps looked like pretty pictures that would not by themselves change policing. The rollout referenced in the thread did in fact happen — all 43 forces published online maps in January 2009 — and the initial coverage focused on making recorded incidents visible rather than on delivering automatic outcomes. (See contemporary coverage.)
The Guardian

That said, the technology has a defensible use-case when it feeds evidence-led, place-focused work rather than standing alone as PR. Systematic reviews of hot‑spots policing find that focused place-based interventions, when properly designed and partnered with prevention work, produce small but reliable crime reductions; the map is the start of an operational conversation, not the whole plan. Police.uk later centralized and professionalized many of those early efforts. (See the hot‑spots review and the Police.uk rollout background.)
Hot‑spots review (OJP / Braga et al.)
Police.uk / context (ONS summary)

Important technical caveats reduce the maps’ standalone value. Street maps show police‑recorded incidents (not survey estimates), locations are often anonymised or approximated, categories and update schedules vary, and under‑reporting and measurement differences mean counts are not the same as incidence rates. Treat counts as a flag to investigate further — convert to rates, check multi‑month trends, and look for outcome/detection fields.
ONS guidance on crime data comparability and limits
data.police.uk: street‑level methods and location anonymisation

Finally, ’s quip about drive‑by downloads points at a real risk with third‑party mashups. Prefer official feeds (Police.uk / data.police.uk API) when building or embedding maps, serve content over HTTPS, vet widgets and ad networks, and avoid copying unknown embed code that could carry malvertising. NHS Digital and sector advisories document real examples of malicious redirects and drive‑by techniques to be mindful of.
data.police.uk API docs
NHS Digital advisory on drive‑by/malvertising threats

Salem 6,009 Posting Sage

Perhaps they're hoping to get some drive-by downloads to help them with this ;)
http://www.daniweb.com/blogs/entry3752.html

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.