iPad Proves Apple's Advantage Again

Techwriter10 1 Tallied Votes 776 Views Share

Say what you will about Apple, love 'em or hate 'em, you have to admit they have a special magic when it comes to creating gadgets that consumers clamor for. They have a unique mix of design, build-up and marketing that when combined drive popularity and sales in huge numbers. People have to have these devices. They line up for days outside of Apple Stores. This is no ordinary curiosity. They create a lust for their products.

The next in line is the iPad. Now, I haven't held one in my hands yet, but I've seen enough to know that the key ingredients of the Apple recipe are there. What I don't get is how they always seem to produce devices that everyone else could have, but didn't.

Superior Design

Apple products look, feel and (generally) work great. They are intuitive to use. They feel good in your hands. They have a cool factor that no other manufacturer seems to be able to match. The iPhone was not the first touch screen phone, but it was the one that is most oft imitated.

In a couple of weeks, we will see the first iPads, yet another product that everyone could have produced, yet Apple somehow beat the market again. There will be other similar products, no doubt, but once Apple has everyone's attention, it's hard for other manufactures to be heard.

The Big Build-up

My friend and colleague Joe Brockmeier lamented i earlier this year about how Twitter goes nuts every time the Apple Store web site goes down, seemingly falling for this tactic time and again. The implication of course is that a big announcement will follow (which is not always the case), but it proves a bigger point. Apple knows how to manipulate the publicity machine and it does it better than perhaps any company out there.

No other product examplifies this build up more than the iPad. We heard rumors of it for almost two years. People were screaming for this thing long before it existed. Stories about its size, price, and abilities were widely discussed before Apple had it's big iPad show in January.

The Marketing Machine

And once that product is out there, the famed Apple marketing machine goes into gear. Apple makes great commercials. Microsoft tries so hard in this regard, but they always come off a little gawky, a tad awkward and not altogether sure of themselves. Apple on the other hand, comes off as cool, collected and ready to sell. You are convinced you want this thing.

The funny thing is that Apple is trying to get you to buy in to their proprietary system. The fact is that the web is perfectly suited to handle many of the functions that are currently being handled in Apple's proprietary App world and development platform. Yet we can't get enough of their stuff. We just gotta have it. And the iPad is the latest in the parade of products. And chances are, it's going to be just as successful. They just seem to have a way.

Dani AI

Generated

This thread captures the original iPad debate in one place: points to design, buildup, and marketing; pushed for deeper analysis; highlighted simplicity; and called it a "crippled Mac." The more useful question left open is not whether Apple can generate hype, but when the iPad's deliberate tradeoffs actually improve the user experience compared with a Mac.

Apple's advantage is systemic, not just style. Controlling hardware, the OS, app distribution, and key accessories lets Apple optimize for consistent, low-friction experiences instead of trying to support every edge case. That yields fast wake, long battery life, predictable app behavior, and a large catalog of task-specific apps. Those design choices explain why many people accept constraints in exchange for reliability and a smoother, simpler workflow — the point and were getting at.

Calling the iPad a "crippled Mac" is accurate only under a feature-parity test. The iPad is a different point on the device spectrum: consumption- and touch-first, app-centric, and sandboxed. Desktop workflows that need open files, plug-ins, complex multitasking, or full-featured native apps will favor a Mac. Portability, instant-on access, long battery life, and touch-optimized apps favor the iPad. A quick heuristic: choose a Mac when the job requires desktop-class apps, hardware expansion, or heavy multitasking; choose an iPad when mobility and streamlined, app-driven tasks are primary.

From the early launch forward the practical tradeoffs mattered most. Real-world workflow tests — email, document editing, photo handling, and cloud sync — determined whether the iPad could replace a laptop for a given user. Accessory choices (keyboard, docking), cloud services, and the availability of dedicated apps often decided the outcome more than raw specs. In short, Apple's "magic" is real, but its value depends on which problems need solving.

Bobva 0 Newbie Poster

Sine the author lacks any insight as to WHY apple products are popular, maybe he should read...http://www.beatweek.com/blog/3446-why-we-only-cover-the-iphone/

Techwriter10 42 Practically a Posting Shark

Bobva:
If you're going to use my blog to promote your own blog, the least you could do is be fair about your assessment. I think the section on Superior Design covers why people love Apple products.

Ron

jth1 0 Newbie Poster

- Seriously reply to the article with some actual insight rather than just try and give yourself a bump.

- I've never been an Apple fan but I'm starting to see that simplicty and getting it done is what Apple does. Good article.

Techwriter10 42 Practically a Posting Shark

jth1:
Thanks for the vote of confidence. Much appreciated. :-)

Ron

Santosh20 0 Newbie Poster

I don't think iPad is good enough to justify the hype. It is just a crippled mac. Better buy a mac than iPad.

Techwriter10 42 Practically a Posting Shark

Santosh20,
You could be right, but we'll find out what we're getting in a couple of weeks.

Thanks for the comment.
Ron

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.