I have a theory that I'd like someone to affirm or refute. With sites like Flickr now on the scene wouldn't another method of optimizing the speed with which a site can be downloaded be to upload your pictures first to one of those sites and then just include the link to it in the proper place in your page as the source?
Reliable
1
Junior Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to PostPeople would still have to download the picture from flickr to be able to see it so IMO I still think it would take just as long for a user.
All 3 Replies
HI2Japan
23
Junior Poster
People would still have to download the picture from flickr to be able to see it so IMO I still think it would take just as long for a user.
Simon27
0
Newbie Poster
The Flickr Community Guidelines (http://www.flickr.com/guidelines.gne) does not allow the service to be used for hosting web graphics and your account could be terminated if you do.
Reliable
1
Junior Poster
THanks. I missed that.
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.