I ran 4 online scans this morning.
Bit Defender, Housecall, and Eset all gave me a clean bill of health.
Panda Active Scan had already found 1109 infections, having only scanned 14% of the system.
Is this because Panda is by far the best at doing it's job?
Or is it, maybe, because Panda charges for removing infections?
I would love to have your comments, and especially a satisfactory explanation of the inconsistency.
My own protection systems all give me a clean bill of health.