This is funny :icon_cheesygrin:
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
lol that was good
vmanes 1,165 Posting Virtuoso
Be even better to see the payback.
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
Heh i was finally able to see this the other day,it is something else!!
I cant believe she didnt see him there!!
And yes,i wonder if she did something back..
Obeledeveloper -3 Light Poster
What's up dude, why were you banned at one point? :?:
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
Hi buddy,
It was a misunderstanding i guess......
Someone thought i was doing something i wasnt (I didnt word my post right and they didnt think before they acted (I do that also quite a bit unfortunetly))
Im not mad @ them but i dont know how they feel about me..
I like Daniweb alot!
William Hemsworth 1,339 Posting Virtuoso
hehe x)
Obeledeveloper -3 Light Poster
......
Someone thought i was doing something i wasnt (I didnt word my post right and they didnt think before they acted.....
ow! well that doesn't sound fair, good to have you back though!
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
I dunno,maybe they were in a bad mood...
Alot of people lately all over the net are cranky,letting things bother them that didnt before.......
Maybe whats happening to the USA might be a reason.. (The economy) Im not sure.......
I think if staff on a said site doesnt like something someone posted,they should just delete the content!! (Banning someone isnt very nice (Only the ADMIN on a site should be able to do that (Not the staff)))
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
it wasnt the economy or fact that you posted something that we didnt like ,it was the fact that you posted something asking someone to do something illegal. And you really aught to have known better, you have been warned many times before. There was a staff discussion. Some were in favour, some were against. However it was eventually found that asking someone to do something which would break the rules was not breaking the rules itself, and that therefore you would be better off with a warning instead of a ban.
either which way, this thread is not the place for a discussion about this.
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
Im sorry buddy.....
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
its no problem
i mean, no-one wants to see you banned, you are a regular, and we all like your posts. This one is a classic. Im gonna try the baby power thing on my flatmate later this week
William Hemsworth 1,339 Posting Virtuoso
no-one wants to see you banned
I certainly don't want you banned, things around here would be so dull if it wasn't for you.. :)
MosaicFuneral 812 Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
It says it equals -Page 2 - Geeks' Lounge - Mozilla Firefox .
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
?
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
486DX, 16MB, stripped-down distro of Slackware 7.1, on two floppies.
That machine could run a better OS. I run NT4 on a similarly specced pc.
MosaicFuneral 812 Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
If you has Firefox and look up, you might get the joke.
That machine could run a better OS. I run NT4 on a similarly specced pc.
True, it use to run Win 3.11, but the hard-drive started to die, so I just use it as a test machine now. Usually only has half its RAM in(8mb).
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
Thats awesome you had Win3.11 online and stuff :)
How good did it run?? Could you view this clip??
Thanx for the kind words Mr Bennet and William :)
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
3.11 runs okay online, you can install a 16 bit version of IE5. Its a bit of a PITA to get TCP/IP installed but its doable. Once you do that you are good to go on the net.
I got firefox 1.5 on NT 3.51 in a VM (its a real 32 bit os like XP so can run a surprising number of recent programs, doesnt run FF2 or 3 though, because it doesnt like the fact it uses the program manager instead of the explorer shell)
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
w0w!!
So you can probably run 3.11 w/o a firewall right??
I have read ppl not runinng a firewall on 98se and i think its too dangerous to do that,98 is too new to chance not having a firewall!
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
Here is the thread where they are discussing it (Page 4 so ya dont have to read the whole thread)
http://msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=126549&st=60
I would be worried i tnink to not have a firewall (I know what ppl can do if they gain entry!)
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
There are very few 16 bit viruses.
hotmatrixx 21 Posting Whiz
dude. that was perfect.
The Dude 944 Nearly a Senior Poster
There are very few 16 bit viruses.
Still i would be weary of running wide open w/o a firewall.....
I mean,i have port 113 COMPLETLY STEALTHED..... (As well as all my ports)
Jen0608 -43 Junior Poster
aww.. thats so mean!
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.