The iPad: worth dying for?

newsguy 1 Tallied Votes 368 Views Share

Many a gadget freak has claimed 'I would kill for an iPad' over the last few weeks, but as the world officially goes iPad crazy ask your self this: would you die for an iPad? That's the rather serious question being asked as the Chinese factory where the iPad is made comes under increasing scrutiny concerning the number of suicides amongst the workers there.

According to "Bosses at Apple contractor Foxconn admitted that at least 10 of their workers had now committed suicide while another 20 had tried to take their own lives at work" and the Daily Mail reports how a 17 year old girl lies crippled in a hospital bed a couple of miles away from the factory after leaping "from her fourth-floor dormitory rather than take her place on the production line" just 40 days after starting work at what is believed to be the largest factory in the world.

The number of suicides has risen to 12 since the Morning Star covered the story and the Independent claims "The deaths are thought to be related to working conditions at the plant – long hours for poor pay and constant pressure to perform" and The Telegraph reckons "the hysteria at Longhua, where between 300,000 and 400,000 employees eat, work and sleep, has grown to such a pitch that workers have twisted Foxconn’s Chinese name so that it now sounds like: Run to your Death."

Rather incredibly, and some might say lacking in empathy, the billionaire chairman of Foxconn parent company Hon Hai Precision, Terry Gou, told Forbes.com "Generally, the suicide rate in a society will increase when its GDP rises". That said, Gou also told the Times of India "I can't sleep every night. From a scientific point of view, I'm not confident we can stop every case. But, as a responsible employer, we have to take up the responsibility of preventing as many as we can".

Yet at the same time, relatives of some of those who were unsuccessful in their suicide attempts, such as the parents of that 17 year old mentioned earlier, claim they have been told not to speak to the media or Foxconn will stop paying her medical expenses.

Apples take on all this? A spokesperson says "We are saddened and upset by the recent suicides at Foxconn. Apple is deeply committed to ensuring that conditions throughout our supply chain are safe and workers are treated with respect and dignity".

Dani AI

Generated

This thread surfaces a tough, practical question: how much of a device’s true cost should be counted in human terms? started the conversation with reports about a major contract factory, and the replies show the familiar split — moral concern versus the feeling of having no realistic alternatives.

As notes, much final assembly happens in large manufacturing hubs, and ’s “price of technology” line neatly captures the trade-off. That said, the situation isn’t simply helplessness or boycott. Signals that a brand is taking supplier issues seriously include published supplier lists, independent third‑party audit results with remediation timelines, visible worker grievance or “worker voice” channels, and regular public progress reports.

There are also levers beyond consumer boycotts. Procurement and product teams can require supplier transparency in contracts, score bids on labor-standards compliance, budget for longer device lifecycles and refurbished units, and insist on corrective-action plans after audits. Civil-society campaigns, investor engagement and worker-led groups have driven measurable supplier changes in other sectors — sustained pressure works better than one-off headlines.

Acknowledging that many posters (like ) still enjoy devices such as the iPad, it helps to think in terms of small, sustained pressures rather than moral purity tests. The choice between convenience and conscience is personal, but collective, informed actions — demanding transparency, preferring longer-lived products, and backing credible accountability efforts — are the practical routes that tend to reduce the human cost over time.

finito 46 Nearly a Posting Virtuoso

I think you should rename the Headline to Price of technology.

This is not Just Apple. (No I don't use any apple products)
This is the Chinese Industry in whole, what do you suggest we do?

It is nice to point out that there is a problem, I am happy that you provided me with the knowledge that this is happening, but the whole world is depending on China and looking the other way, everyone knows the condition in China but they still buy Chinese products. Will I stop buying Chinese products? No I don't have choice in the matter everything is made in China whether I like it or not.

So it's either Stop buying all sorts of electronic goods have a worldwide strike on Chinese goods or not do anything and look the other way.

Spain 0 Newbie Poster

I think you should rename the Headline to Price of technology.

Good point. However, I think sometimes it's not worth it.

finito 46 Nearly a Posting Virtuoso

Good point. However, I think sometimes it's not worth it.

What do you mean? Technology? or The iPad?

Spain 0 Newbie Poster

What do you mean? Technology? or The iPad?

I meant technology. If improvements take lives in their way... we have to decide whether it is really that important for us to achieve the iPad (or anything else).

finito 46 Nearly a Posting Virtuoso

Well, I believe you are misdirecting your View.

None or minimal technological innovation comes from China.

China is more of Mass production centre.

It's not Apples fault that their consumers want their products to be competitively priced.

China wouldn't be the China it is today without the materialistic Society of World.

So who is to blame?

remilt 0 Newbie Poster

iPad it's my favorit)

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.