Hands-on with the world's first portable USB3 SSD Flash drive

happygeek 1 Tallied Votes 528 Views Share
Manufacturer
Iomega
URL Screenshot of http://go.io…sh-drive/ssd/ http://go.iomega.com/en-us/products/ssd-flash-drive/ssd/
Price
$229.99
Pros
Small, light, good looking and resilient to damage. Low power consumption, remains cool to touch and stays quiet. Fast read speeds.
Cons
Very expensive per GB, average USB2 performance, not so fast during write operations as might be expected.
Summary
Solid State Disks (SSD) are increasingly commonplace in higher-specced, and higher priced, laptops these days for good reason: they are pretty resistant to knock-about damage. Now SSDs are available as external drive units as well, with the fact that they are small and rugged being the main selling points. The Iomega SSD Flash drive adds one more thing to the list: USB3 connectivity. DaniWeb has been putting one to the test...
Rating

Solid State Disks are ideally suited to laptop use, being small and thin but rugged as well. The lack of moving parts is pretty much a win-win for mobile usage, making these units much less prone to the knocks and drops of daily life than your average mechanical hard drive. The only real downside has been, and to be honest remains, the higher cost; which is why you still tend to find SSD storage restricted to specification for higher end machines. Actually 'only' is a bit of an exaggeration as SSD is becoming a popular choice amongst fans of external hard drive units, with the rugged workings all wrapped up in a slim casing being rather appealing to the pocket in terms of portability if not price.


Being a USB3 device, you would expect the Iomega SSD Flash to be pretty speedy and when compared to a bog standard USB2 drive it certainly was. Iomega claims a maximum read speed of up to 191MB/s and up to 130MB/s write speed, but my real world tests here were just a tad less impressive. Connected to a suitably USB3 equipped PC running Windows 7, I clocked large files averaging a read speed of 120MB/s while smaller ones hit 70MB/s. Writing speeds averaged out at less impressive 65MB/s and 40MB/s respectively.

Those are decent enough read numbers for a USB3 portable drive, and eclipse anything you'll get from a portable USB2 device. But, and it's a pretty big but it has to be said, they look distinctly average on the write front and not at all clever for either both when stacked up against what you might expect from an internal SATA interfaced USB3 hard drive. This could well be down to the Iomega design which incorporates a SATA3 to USB3 adapter inside the device, and which could be creating something of performance bottleneck compared to a direct SATA connection without the go-between adaptor.


If you've not yet upgraded to USB3 then one might legitimately ask what you are doing buying a USB3 specced SSD in the first place, but assuming you have it will still work with your kit (albeit a tad more slowly) courtesy of the rather nifty dual-headed USB2/USB3 connector cable head. Use it as a USB2 drive though, and you lose the advantage of those super fast average read times that you've paid so much to experience.

The Iomega SSD Flash is stunningly good looking in a brushed black metal casing which stays lovely and cool to the touch, this could easily (and indeed would have if I were the marketing guy) been called the Iomega SSD Stealth. It's suitably slim at 4.35" x 2.72" x .37" (L x W x H) and wonderfully lightweight all things considered at just .24 lbs as well. This being SSD is totally silent in operation as well, and draws a smaller energy load than your average mechanical drive.


Given the price of this thing, and it sure doesn't come cheap, you can be forgiven for wanting more than just good looks for your money: and you get it in the form of a truly superb three year warranty from Iomega as standard. You also get 256-bit AES hardware encryption built in, and something called 'Iomega Drop Guard Xtreme II' which promised to help it survive a fall of up to 10 feet although I will admit to being too much of a tight fisted wimp to put this claim to the test.

But is that enough? The 64GB drive that I looked at retails for a none too cheap $229.99, but if you thought that was a lot of money for the amount of storage wait until you get load of the 128GB and 256GB devices which cost $399.99 and a stinking great $749.99 respectively.

Sadly, given the fact that the value proposition is so lacking in terms of a storage price of $3.59 per GB for the 64GB model I tested. To put that into perspective I cannot recall another drive I have had pass through my offices here in the last year which hit anything higher than $0.50 per GB. I would be inclined to recommend waiting for USB3 SSD prices to drop quite a bit further before investing in this particular storage medium, despite the stealthy looks and the early adopter appeal.

Dani AI

Generated

The hands-on by captures the practical trade-offs of early USB3 SSD externals: very pocketable, quiet and well built, but real-world write behaviour and the price premium deserve scrutiny. Thread replies from and reflect the obvious excitement, but the review also leaves a few verification steps and caveats that are useful to add for anyone reading this later.

Recommended checks and quick tests:

  • Freshly format the drive to the intended filesystem and run a large sequential copy (single multi-GB file) to measure sustained write performance rather than short bursts.
  • Run a small-file transfer (many small files or an archive) to reveal directory and metadata overhead.
  • Use a standard benchmark (CrystalDiskMark/ATTO on Windows, fio or dd on Linux) to compare sequential and 4K random IOPS.
  • Repeat a long sustained write for 10-20 minutes to detect thermal throttling or cache exhaustion.
  • Verify how the hardware AES is unlocked and whether the vendor software is required on other OSes; confirm warranty terms for accidental drop claims.

Troubleshooting and context:

  • A USB3-to-SATA bridge inside an enclosure can limit sustained writes and may not pass TRIM or SMART commands. That explains why advertised peak numbers sometimes do not match sustained real-world performance.
  • If write speeds are unexpectedly low, try a different USB3 port/cable, update host USB3 drivers, and disable aggressive power-saving settings on the host.
  • Treat the rugged/drop claims as marketing until the warranty paperwork confirms coverage for accidental damage.

Bottom line: great for fast, rugged, read-heavy portable storage and for carrying working data, but not the best value for bulk backups or heavy sustained-write tasks. For the same budget it can make sense to compare an internal SSD plus a quality USB3 enclosure, or a large external HDD, depending on endurance and cost priorities.

ravishankarkota 0 Newbie Poster

Nice article.Thanks a lot to the Editor.:)

SNIP

guss1988 0 Newbie Poster

Indeed nice article.
Cant wait to get my hands on one of them ;)

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.