Hulu reportedly considering IPO

Emily Banks 0 Tallied Votes 260 Views Share

Hulu might be worth as much as $2 billion, the New York Times reported today, alongside news that the site for streaming videos and TV shows might soon go public.

The Times reported that the 3-year-old company has been in talks recently to begin a public stock offering potentially later this year. So far in the site's short existence, it has struggled to turn a major profit. Last year the company reportedly brought in $100 million.

And according to , Hulu ads reached almost 8 percent of the American population in June and in July reached almost 30 percent.

An IPO, as well as an upcoming monthly subscription of $9.99 for Hulu Premium, could bolster the site's status, compared to rivals like YouTube and Netflix' video streaming service. Hulu Premium provides more selection, like complete seasons' of shows, and service on more devices.

"As a publicly traded company, Hulu could have more resources to continue its expansion, making cable and satellite companies even more nervous about IP-delivered programming. By shifting the cost of the data connection and hardware to the consumer, Hulu could conceivably offer the same service for less than it would cost through cable and satellite middlemen," Eliot Van Buskirk wrote on today. "Another company with reason to fear Hulu is Netflix, because both companies are fighting to deliver both television shows and films over the internet, and only Hulu is partially owned by the same companies that own the content."

Hulu was created as a joint venture by NBC Universal, News Coporation, the Walt Disney Company.

Dani AI

Generated

highlighted the 2010 IPO buzz — that was a real headline at the time, but it didn’t play out the way many expected. Below is a concise, verifiable follow‑up and what it meant for Hulu’s product and ownership path.

Owners briefly tested the sale option in 2011 after an unsolicited bid, then decided to keep and build the business instead of selling. The decision reflects how strategic value to the media owners outweighed a quick exit, and it set the company on a path of product and licensing changes rather than a public listing. (phys.org)

Over the next years Hulu shifted from an ad‑centric experiment into a hybrid business: paid subscriptions, expanded device support and eventually a live‑TV offering were added so the service could compete with pay‑TV replacements. The “Hulu + Live TV” product was a major step in that evolution. (techcrunch.com)

Ownership consolidated instead of an IPO. In 2019, AT&T exited its minority stake and Disney increased its control; shortly after, Disney struck a deal with Comcast that gave Disney operational control and a path to buy Comcast’s stake in the future under pre‑agreed terms. Those corporate moves folded Hulu into Disney’s streaming strategy rather than into the public markets. (cnbc.com)

Bottom line: the 2010 IPO rumors were accurate as news, but not predictive of the eventual outcome. Hulu remained private and was absorbed into larger corporate streaming strategies, which in practice mattered more for content licensing, device support and bundling than an early public listing would have. ()

Practical note (context for the thread): for anyone comparing services or building integrations, the key takeaway is that ownership and licensing moves drove platform behavior and content availability more than a hypothetical IPO ever would have.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.