Member Avatar for oclane

I decided to come up with a new tactics for my site and the only thing that comes from my mind is "link exchange" because I've never done it before. Suggestions?

  • 14 Contributors
  • 13 Replies
  • 320 Views
  • 1 Month Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by MaryDD

Dani AI

Generated

Short practical summary: link exchanges are an old-school tactic and should not be treated as a primary SEO strategy. Google’s spam guidance explicitly calls out “excessive link exchanges” and partner pages created only for cross-linking as link spam, so systematic swapping or running a partners/resource page for the sole purpose of passing PageRank is risky. Several replies here (for example recommending an isolated exchange page, and urging quality control) reflect sensible risk-reduction instincts, but that exact “partner pages” pattern is what Google flags. Also note that public Toolbar PageRank is gone and should not be the metric for choosing partners. (developers.google.com)

If any exchange is done, keep it tiny, editorial, and user-focused: place reciprocal links inside relevant content (not sitewide footers or blogrolls), avoid automated networks or link directories, and only swap with genuinely relevant, reputable sites that add user value. Mark any compensated links correctly: use rel="sponsored" for paid placements, rel="ugc" for user-generated links, and rel="nofollow" where appropriate — Google treats these rel values as signals (hints) and they reduce the chance that a justified link will be misinterpreted as a scheme. Example: 

<a href="https://partner.example" rel="sponsored">Partner</a>

(developers.google.com)

Monitor and document everything. Use Google Search Console to watch inbound links and the Manual Actions report; if an “unnatural links” action appears, follow Google’s cleanup path (ask for removals, keep records, then use the Disavow tool only if necessary and include outreach evidence when requesting review). Long-term, invest time in linkable assets and editorial outreach (original data, tools, case studies, useful guides) — those one-way, editorial links deliver far more durable value than trading links. (developers.google.com)

Recommended Answers

All 13 Replies

Member Avatar for johnmarshal

According to me if you will change your link with and good pr site so ya it ok.

Member Avatar for megna73

The link exchange technique has gained enormous enterprise and popularity in the Planet Wide Web. Even organizations like Microsoft could not stay aside from this sort of innovative idea of company.

Edited by megna73 because: n/a
Member Avatar for Spletnapot

Personally i would not go into link exchange, not even one way link exchange. But thats just me and does not mean you cannot benefit from it. If decided to try it, i would suggest, you make a new sub-page just for that purpose(the exchange links) and preferably link that exchange page only from site map page. Or in other words dont link that exchange page to much through the web site, as it can eat some of the pr juice. And go for one way link exchange.

Edited by Spletnapot because: n/a
Member Avatar for tennisconnexion

I think link exchange is a good thing,if you are exchanging links with good PR And niche related website. Google count every link as a vote for your website and consider it as a popularity of your site in a specific niche.

Member Avatar for admec

You have taken the right decision to do "Link Exchange" although its not an easy task if we get the oppotunity of link exchange with different website then it benefits us alot like:- It effects our website's PR and google read's all those link's but we must see that the site with which we are exchanging our website link we have not put "no follow" command if they had put the "no follow" command then we will get seo benefits and we must prefer to exchange link with those website only whose pr is more or equivalent to our website.

Edited by Ezzaral because: Snipped 'fake sig' link. Please restrict such links to your site-wide user signature, which can be edited from the user control panel.
Member Avatar for Elvin3

Yes

link exchange is the best way to get backlinks to your website.

Member Avatar for ahmadferi

I prefer a link in one direction, because we do not need other people to put a link to our blog

Member Avatar for claudejean123

Exchanging links is good for blog or websites that has a good pr with high traffic. So before joining some link exchange transaction, always check the pr and the sites traffic...

Member Avatar for JamieLynnSEO

As others have stated, yes. Link exchange is good... as long as its done with links to sites with good PR. Sites that are related, and have quality content. Bad links... Bad PR... those will harm you more than they will do you good.

Member Avatar for SEOnlace

Link exchanges can bee good ... if consider the following items:

1. related sites or related keywords
2. good and unique content
3. different hosting
4. no bad neighborhood sites

But you will get more link power by building non reciprocal backlinks. Try link baiting or a lot easier aquire somme good backlinks at text link market places.

Member Avatar for lisaroy1

Yes Link Exchange helps a lot in getting many Backlinks to your sites

Member Avatar for TuffeyJ

There are so many ways to find good backlinks free so why do link exchange? Link exchange is a last thing you do when you not find any other way of getting links.

Member Avatar for MaryDD

It is good if you are doing 3-way link exchange and you shouldn't do it extensively..

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.