0

How will Microsoft differentiate Windows 8 in an already crowded Windows OS user space? How about, for one, with the use of a photographic gesture security system for logging in? The idea of using a photo to identify and authenticate the user is not without some pretty obvious problems (ambient lighting, bad hair day, forgetting to shave could all screw up your chances of using the computer that day) which is why Microsoft developers have thought outside of the box on this one.

The important part of the 'photographic gesture security system' can be found in the gesture bit. Instead of using a photo of the user, the user instead chooses any photo they like and then selects parts of the image itself to use instead of a password. So, for example, you could tap on your face in a group photo, or draw a circle around the monkey in the top left corner of a wildlife image, or drag a line to connect two people in a photo. The gestures themselves act as your password, whether created using a touchscreen and your finger or a mouse it makes no difference: it is the act of tapping, drawing or dragging within a specific location of the screen that allows you access to the computer.

Now you may think that this is inherently insecure, after all the chances are that the bit of a group photo chosen to be the picture password will be the user him or herself. However, it's not that simple. Someone trying to bypass the security measures would need to know more than just what bit of the picture is being used but also where the start and endpoints of the drawing/dragging process are.

I'm actually all for any kind of login innovation which makes basic computing more secure for the masses, and welcome these early moves by Microsoft to bring something new to the Windows OS from the ITSec perspective. However, some security vendors are already warning that higher levels of authentication may be needed for some users. Steve Watts, co-founder of tokenless two-factor authentication specialists SecurEnvoy, says that the Windows 8 pictorial authentication will rely on the accuracy of the touch screen device, as well as the accuracy of the user's gestures when logging in.

"Some users may also find that the system is far from secure when using their laptop in public places" Watts warns "pictorial login systems can easily be seen in a busy railway or airport café by someone visually eavesdropping your laptop from the next table. Using a mobile phone to authenticate yourself, on the other hand, is a far more secure process, as it uses something you have and something you know, to verify you are who you claim to be. Put simply, if someone shoulder surfs your login using the new Windows 8 security system, then they effectively have access to your computer. So whilst we welcome this alternative to the tired old PIN and password system that has been proven to be less than secure as means of logging in, we feel that the message about tokenless two-factor authentication also needs to be made."

Attachments win8.jpg 24.09 KB

As Editorial Director and Managing Analyst with IT Security Thing I am putting more than two decades of consulting experience into providing opinionated insight regarding the security threat landscape for IT security professionals. As an Editorial Fellow with Dennis Publishing, I bring more than two decades of writing experience across the technology industry into publications such as Alphr, IT Pro and (in good old fashioned print) PC Pro. I also write for SC Magazine UK and Infosecurity, as well as The Times and Sunday Times newspapers. Along the way I have been honoured with a Technology Journalist of the Year award, and three Information Security Journalist of the Year awards. Most humbling, though, was the Enigma Award for 'lifetime contribution to IT security journalism' bestowed on me in 2011.

7
Contributors
9
Replies
11
Views
5 Years
Discussion Span
Last Post by jwenting
1

That's actually a bright idea there. If laptops and PC's could get NFC chips, you could use your NFC enabled phone to login to Windows.

1

That's actually a bright idea there. If laptops and PC's could get NFC chips, you could use your NFC enabled phone to login to Windows.

I don't trust RFID-based technologies. Don't get me wrong, they have a place, such as inventory tracking; but I don't think they should be used in sensitive applications, like financial transactions. I wouldn't want something like this. In my opinion, RFID is too insecure.

Anyone with the right app on their phone and the proper reader can steal the information in the "tag". If you have a wallet full of PayPass, FastTap, etc. credit cards, someone can steal your entire wallet without even sticking their hand in your pocket, and you would never know. This is why I refuse to use these types of cards.

Edited by Fbody: n/a

0

My uncle uses the RFID cards and things because he has to, but he claims that the piece of aluminum foil he uses to line the outer portions of his tri-fold wallet block the RFID's from being detected unless his wallet is open.

0

I believe that using a mobile phone would be the best option, however it could be even more secure than just having the phone on your person. How about the phone has to be known to the machine, allowing the phone to connect to the machine via a wireless technology. Then the user is then required to enter a pin on the phone. Similar to the iPhone with WIFI sync.

0

That could also work. Another thing that can be done is if the phone and PC are connected, the PC could send a code to the phone, which is then used to unlock the PC. Kind off like the Blizzard Battle.net authenticator.

0

But if the phone is connected physically. Could not just use card readers of USB dongles, systems that all ready in place on a lot of machines. However of you mean connected wirelessly it could be similar to bluetooth pass code for pairing. However the phone all ready being known to the machine.

Edited by mikulucky: Spelling

0

How will Microsoft differentiate Windows 8 in an already crowded Windows OS user space? How about, for one, with the use of a photographic gesture security system for logging in? The idea of using a photo to identify and authenticate the user is not without some pretty obvious problems (ambient lighting, bad hair day, forgetting to shave could all screw up your chances of using the computer that day) which is why Microsoft developers have thought outside of the box on this one.

The important part of the 'photographic gesture security system' can be found in the gesture bit. Instead of using a photo of the user, the user instead chooses any photo they like and then selects parts of the image itself to use instead of a password. So, for example, you could tap on your face in a group photo, or draw a circle around the monkey in the top left corner of a wildlife image, or drag a line to connect two people in a photo. The gestures themselves act as your password, whether created using a touchscreen and your finger or a mouse it makes no difference: it is the act of tapping, drawing or dragging within a specific location of the screen that allows you access to the computer.

Now you may think that this is inherently insecure, after all the chances are that the bit of a group photo chosen to be the picture password will be the user him or herself. However, it's not that simple. Someone trying to bypass the security measures would need to know more than just what bit of the picture is being used but also where the start and endpoints of the drawing/dragging process are.

I'm actually all for any kind of login innovation which makes basic computing more secure for the masses, and welcome these early moves by Microsoft to bring something new to the Windows OS from the ITSec perspective. However, some security vendors are already warning that higher levels of authentication may be needed for some users. Steve Watts, co-founder of tokenless two-factor authentication specialists SecurEnvoy, says that the Windows 8 pictorial authentication will rely on the accuracy of the touch screen device, as well as the accuracy of the user's gestures when logging in.

"Some users may also find that the system is far from secure when using their laptop in public places" Watts warns "pictorial login systems can easily be seen in a busy railway or airport café by someone visually eavesdropping your laptop from the next table. Using a mobile phone to authenticate yourself, on the other hand, is a far more secure process, as it uses something you have and something you know, to verify you are who you claim to be. Put simply, if someone shoulder surfs your login using the new Windows 8 security system, then they effectively have access to your computer. So whilst we welcome this alternative to the tired old PIN and password system that has been proven to be less than secure as means of logging in, we feel that the message about tokenless two-factor authentication also needs to be made."


I want to know is this window will be secure from .exe virus or spyware attacks.

– der große Test!

Edited by Narue: Snipped self-promotion link.

0

I want to know is this window will be secure from .exe virus or spyware attacks.

it's the user who's vulnerable to those, not the operating system. That's been the case for at least a decade now.

Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.