I think Social Bookmarking services are a niche trend at best. They were very popular in the early-mid 2000's but the need for them was erroded from multiple angles.
Chrome came along with its excellent browser syncing, which in turn forced Firefox to up its game and follow suit. This negated the 'access my bookmarks from anywhere' angle, as once you're signed into your browser, you have full access to not only your bookmarks but also your logins, passwords, sesssions etc.
Secondly, sites like Digg, Reddit and even Pinterest filled the 'sharing cool stuff' niche.
Here's the trend for Delicious over the last 13 or so years.
Here's how I'd do it (and have done it for years). It's the canonical, accepted answer for Linux too.
The SSH program has support for 'shortcuts' built in, you simply need to add the hostnames (or aliases) in your ~/.ssh/config file.
So, in my config file, if I have the following entry:
# Github
host github
HostName github.com
User git
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_workThen, on the command line I simply type ssh git and hit tab a couple of times, and all of the entries that start with git automatically appear for selection/autocompletion:
Note that in the config file I'm specifying which private key (IdentityFile) to use for that host, SSH will use this whenever connecting to this specified host. Previous commenters have already gone through how to set up key pairs; this is definitely the best and most secure way of connecting to remote machines. Ideally you should turn off password based login and rely entirely on a key pair.
If you really want desktop shortcusts, just create a bash script (and make sure it's executable) with the .command suffix. However, with nice tab completion on the command line it's quicker and easier (imho) to just use the built-in command.
Edit: here are Digital Ocean's instructions for setting up SSH keys. They are very thorough and generic enough to use anywhere.
You're calling worldmapA() but your function is called worldMapA().
Chrome dev tools will help you in situations like this.
Did you actually read the source? Assuming you want to replace the icon-cog:
<div class="icon-cog box-icon"></div>Replace the contents of the div with an img tag:
<div class="box-icon">
<img width="60" height="60" src="http://i.imgur.com/vPkeDtI.png"/>
</div>Results in beautiful images whever you like.
Yes, that sounds like a good use case and it's quite easy to set up a reasonable demo in Neo4J.
create
(Frank:Member {name:'Frank'}),
(Julian:Member {name: 'Julian'}),
(Amanda:Member {name: 'Amanda'}),
(Claire:Member:Admin {name: 'Claire'}),
(Susie:Member {name: 'Susie'}),
(Dolly:Member:Admin {name: 'Dolly'}),
(Frank)-[:HAS_CHATTED_TO]->(Amanda),
(Claire)-[:HAS_CHATTED_TO]->(Frank),
(Amanda)-[:HAS_CHATTED_TO]->(Susie),
(Susie)-[:HAS_NOT_CHATTED_TO]->(Dolly),
(Dolly)-[:HAS_NOT_CHATTED_TO]->(Frank),
(Frank)-[:IGNORES]->(Susie),
(Dolly)-[:IGNORES]->(Julian),
(Julian)-[:HAS_CHATTED_TO]->(Amanda)Which results in this graph:
Simple queries are straightforward, I'm no expert though and combining multiple conditions baffles me.
match (n:Member)-[r:HAS_CHATTED_TO]-(m) where n.name='Frank' return n as Frank,r,mResults:
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Frank | r | m |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Node[25]{name:"Frank"} | :HAS_CHATTED_TO[24] {} | Node[27]{name:"Amanda"} |
| Node[25]{name:"Frank"} | :HAS_CHATTED_TO[25] {} | Node[28]{name:"Claire"} |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
2 rows
17 ms
Compiler CYPHER 3.1
Planner COST
Runtime INTERPRETED
+------------------+----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| Operator | Estimated Rows | Rows | DB Hits | Variables | Other |
+------------------+----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| +ProduceResults | 1 | 2 | 0 | Frank, m, r | Frank, r, m |
| | +----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| +Projection | 1 | 2 | 0 | Frank -- m, n, r | {Frank : n, r : r, m : m} |
| | +----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| +Expand(All) | 1 | 2 | 3 | m, r -- n | (n)-[r:HAS_CHATTED_TO]-(m) |
| | +----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| +Filter | 1 | 1 | 6 | n | n.name == { AUTOSTRING0} |
| | +----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
| +NodeByLabelScan | 6 | 6 | 7 | n | :Member |
+------------------+----------------+------+---------+------------------+----------------------------+
Total database accesses: 16It would appear that too many notifications are added to the feed for certain events, making it difficult to sort the wheat from the chaff.
Take the example of this annoying spammer creating a post:
Aside from the fact he's a waste of oxygen, that's more than one whole screen of notifications for a post creation and quick edit (less than a minute after posting). Also, I don't see any replies, so perhaps the "replied to a post" notification is superflouous. Perhaps these could be condensed; do we need to know who started watching each post - it might make more sense to display that on the post page; "being watched by..."
