Member Avatar for IndianaRonaldo

IDM boosts the download speed. Is there any software that does that for browsing? Like an addon for chrome, firefox? If not, why is it that IDM can download at a good speed while the browser cannot download the webpages fast enough?

  • 4 Contributors
  • 3 Replies
  • 552 Views
  • 20 Hours Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by Reverend Jim

Dani AI

Generated

Short answer: not really — there isn’t a browser addon that reliably speeds up general page browsing the way IDM speeds a single large download. As and pointed out, download accelerators work by splitting a file into byte ranges and downloading those ranges in parallel (and by resuming interrupted transfers). That behavior depends on HTTP range support and the server returning partial responses (206 Partial Content). MDN: HTTP range requests. (developer.mozilla.org)

The reason IDM-style tricks help one big file but not a whole page is the transport and connection math. TCP uses slow‑start and per‑connection congestion control, so many short-lived connections won’t ramp to full bandwidth on their own; opening multiple parallel streams for one file lets the client aggregate multiple congestion windows and often improves throughput. Browsers historically opened several parallel TCP connections per host to reduce queuing, but that is a different trade‑off than accelerating a single-file transfer. MDN: TCP slow start, High Performance Browser Networking — using multiple TCP connections. (developer.mozilla.org)

Modern web transports also change the calculus. HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 multiplex many requests efficiently over a single connection, so the “open more connections” trick gives diminishing returns for page loads and can even harm performance in some networks. Most real-world page slowness comes from latency, render‑blocking scripts, heavy third‑party resources, DNS/ISP/Wi‑Fi issues, and server-side limits — not the same bottleneck IDM targets. See guidance on multiplexing and third‑party script impact. MDN: HTTP messages / HTTP/2 & HTTP/3, web.dev: load third‑party JavaScript responsibly. (developer.mozilla.org)

Practical takeaway (concise): use a download manager or bittorrent for large single files; use browser devtools/WebPageTest to find slow third‑party assets and trim or defer them; prefer wired over flaky Wi‑Fi; ensure no local packet loss, a reasonable DNS, and an up‑to‑date browser (HTTP/2/3 capable) for best page load behavior. The posts by correctly explain the protocol limits — the difference is which bottleneck each tool is designed to fix.

Recommended Answers

All 3 Replies

Member Avatar for SagarSe7en

First of all you should know that IDM is a software specifically designed to boost download speeds upto 5 times faster i.e. Divide Downloads into Multiple Streams for Faster Downloading. Description is Click Here

Next Thing is sites that you visit are also visited by other users at the same time so loading can sometimes take some time.

Description is Click Here

Hope this Description helps you.

PS: Also check what Internet Speeds you are currently subscribed to.

Member Avatar for johhny-marshal

IDM is a speed booster for downloads. It divides the downloading streams into different streams. This enhances the downlaod speed upto 5 times. Also the websites are the common medium for all users. Its obvious that so many users are also accessing the same website at the simultaneously. Which degrades the webpage fetching speed.

commented: Supported this point :-) +2
Member Avatar for Reverend Jim

Before I give my opinion on that, let's look at how downloads occur.

Your computer requests a file from a remote computer

The remote computer sends the file via TCP/IP. This protocol has resend logic built in such that packets that are not received or are corrupted are resent. The protocol also ensures that the sent packets are reconstructed in the correct order.

The speed at which the file is transferred depends on several things such as

  • the speed of your internet connection
  • the reliability (noise, etc) of your internet connection
  • the current load on the sending computer
  • the current load on your computer

If your connection is maxxed out (perhaps you are running a bittorrent) then your download speed is limited by that.

If the sending computer is maxxed out (either serving other users or doing some other task) then your download speed is limited by that.

If your connection is very noisy and packets are continuously being resent then your download speed is limited by that.

In the case of bittorrent transfers, faster download speeds are achieved by dividing the requested file (or files) into pieces. These pieces can be downloaded from multiple servers (thereby avoiding the server-under-load problem). This requires some coordination so that all of the other bittorrent clients can send different pieces at the same time. Note that if your computer was the only one running bittorrent software you would get absolutely no use out of it. It would be like being the only person who had a telephone.

So how might a remote server speed up a file transfer?

  • send a compressed file rather than an uncompressed one
  • split a file into pieces and send the pieces over multiple connections

Well, most files available for download are already compressed to some degree. Music and picture files have their own compressed format and would not benefit from further compression, and many other files are already zipped (or tarred or whatever). And splitting a file into pieces requires that the software on both ends knows what is going on.

Now consider a remote site that is serving up files for download. Is it likely that it would allow one user to open multiple channels at the expense of other users? In fact, a remote server would likely take steps to prevent this (by limiting connections to one per IP address). Is it likely that it would repeatedly (once for each requested download) compress a file before sending?

So a download manager cannot impose a protocol from one end (the user end) only. A download manager cannot improve speeds by forcing the remote server to compress the file before sending. A download manager cannot force a remote server to open multiple channels (at least not if the remote server has any sort of smarts). A download manager cannot force a remote server to slice up a file and coordinate the reassembly upon receipt.

The one thing a download manager might do is allow an interrupted download to be resumed.

So in my opinion, no download manager is worth the money.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.