So yeah... im getting confused now, which one should I get? A 64-bit with much lower speeds or a 32 bit which clocks in at 3.2?
It used to be simple... lol, all we had to do is look at the ghz
nobody2ph
0
Newbie Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to PostDefinitely an Athlon64. Future proof, and outperforms the intel.
All 3 Replies
goldeagle2005
33
Finkus Stinkalotus
Team Colleague
Definitely an Athlon64. Future proof, and outperforms the intel.
'Stein
150
Lapsed Skeptic
Team Colleague
I would agree with ya for the most part,, but arnt there problems with some programs not being compatible w/ 64 bit?
goldeagle2005
33
Finkus Stinkalotus
Team Colleague
Well, some old, old legacy 16-Bit apps won't run. I'm talking real mode DOS apps here. And that's because WIndows ME onward do not include legacy DOS in the OS. Apart from that, there are absolutely no issues. Heck, I've been able to play the original DOS game, prince of persia without any hitch whatsoever.
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.