- Upvotes Received
- 1
- Posts with Upvotes
- 1
- Upvoting Members
- 1
- Downvotes Received
- 0
- Posts with Downvotes
- 0
- Downvoting Members
- 0
SEO Consultant
47 Posted Topics
Re: MySql have a library to enable that: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ | |
Re: Google has to crawl the location of those back links before it will know they exists. And that's no guarantee when and if Google will show them to you in their Webmaster Tools. So, wait. | |
Re: I don't believe PageRank has anything to do with keywords. Google's PageRank is based around links. The use of Keywords effects your chances of showing up in search results. Google states they have over 200 factors (including PageRank) that are taken into account for this. With regards to Keyword Tools. … | |
Re: Will you pay them if words drop? I use a similar system to rank a website, but I would never try and explain how it works to client, nor charge based on it. I just call it their market rank and use it to help indicate progress. You want to … | |
Re: If you don't use the keywords you don't have a chance. Backlinks improve your chance. | |
Re: If it's the website in your signature it may be because your doing keyword spamming in the footer. You've gone a bit crazy with your meta data as well, but I don't think this would be negative. It's a .com domain that is hosted in the USA, so are you … | |
Re: The file lets you request robots not to index certain files. With relation to SEO, it helps you control which pages get indexed. So you can have pages that have no SEObenefit excluded from indexing. Also, restricting the number of pages that can be indexed increases the chance that your … | |
Re: [Just to be pedantic, the title tag is not a meta tag] The title tag and meta description tag are both potentially displayed in the search results, so your primary motivation is to make them encourage people to visit you. The meta description tag has no influence on search result … | |
Re: There is but we would need some more details on what you exactly want to happen. What are the type of file paths you want redirecting and where do you want them to go to? | |
Re: I googled it: 505 Error = HTTP version not supported What I think that means is it does not accept your browser. Either upgrade or switch. I may be wrong. | |
Re: @arooney suggestion should work. Could I ask why you want to do this? If you have just upgraded your site this can be the wrong thing to do. Where possible, redirect to a relevant page, do not just send people home. That will give your visitors a better experience as … | |
Re: How about making you client happy? | |
Re: What do you mean by "Google is generating all the wrong keywords"? | |
Re: Just the home page. You may find this video from Matt Cutts (Google) very informative. It mentions site submission near the end. [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GK0aQrCDEo[/url] Just submit once then focus on other things that will promote your website. | |
Re: My opinion: Ignore [B]to.grow.invest.com[/B] as it is creating subdomains and is not a generally understood form. Register the other two and have the single word form redirect to the dashed form using what is called a 301 Permanent Redirect. Why? It's easier to tell people the single word version and … | |
Re: Generally the answer is no. Your comments are dynamically loaded which makes it very hard for any spider to read them. A few JavaScript comment systems give you the ability to include the comments as plain html, but it's more complex to implement. Using a JavaScript comment systems will not … | |
Re: A good place to start is [URL="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/11/googles-seo-starter-guide.html"]Googles own SEO Starter Guide[/URL]. | |
Re: It's best to have them all [URL="http://seo-website-designer.com/How-To-301-Redirect"]301 Redirect[/URL] to the main website. One reason for this is this ensures people will always link to your main domain and re-enforce it, instead of spreading the link juice across the 8 domains. If you have all the domains display the same content, … | |
Re: As far as I can tell Google has not updated its Toolbar PageRank for almost a year. Don't get too tied up with Toolbar PageRank. It's rarely updated and when done, considered already out of date. Monitor progress through something more solid like traffic, leads, sales etc. To find out … | |
Re: I've not seen an update in the Toolbar PageRank since the beginning of the year. It's slow to update so don't be a slave to it. Follow traffic and conversion stats instead. | |
Re: I've never done it and I don't see the point. Getting links from website pages that don't even get indexed by Google seems to be a waste of time. I get the most benefit from a few quality directories that actually generate traffic and are ranked in the search engines. | |
Re: meta tags have no influence on Search Engines keywords so using stop words has no negative effect. In fact, the meta description is often shown in search results (SERP) so should be designed to interest humans, which would require the use of stop words. | |
Re: Google cannot directly see your database. When you say you did the .htaccess stuff, I presume you set things up to 301 redirect all pages from the old domain to the new domain. If you've done this you should have no issue with stuff on the old domain. In fact, … | |
Re: Robots are not very good at processing javascript. So using javascript to dynamically load a block of text will probably block most if not all of them. | |
Re: If Google was displaying a logo then there's a good chance it's your Google Places entry that they are using. Does it include a link to "Places"? Could you upload a screen shot of what you are seeing? | |
Re: You should try and be consistent. If you use both: mysite.com/blog www. mysite.com/blog then you will get the same page indexed twice and probably flagged as a duplicates. There is no penalty for this but you may end up spreading out you pages "link juice" across the duplicates and reducing … | |
Re: I've found neither skills aid in attracting traffic to the website and therefore providing something useful for your client. Once you have a visitor then it's important, so I think the first step should be to make sure people are aware of your website, not how it looks. | |
Re: A 301 is a Permanent redirect. It is used to tell browsers or search engines that the page they just got sent to as permanently moved to a new location. Search engines will use this indication to transfer their indexed data from the old page to the new one. A … | |
Re: Ask them for details on how they do it. The "affiliation" maybe that they pay for advertising, which is guaranteed top of listing, until they stop paying. As they state "local" it could be that they create a Google Places entry. I believe in the US you can also advertise … | |
Re: Google Ranking (if your talking about PageRank) is not effected by traffic. It is purely to do with website links. Saying that, your ultimate aim is probably to get traffic from relevant visitors. Link building will help your PageRank and good content with onsite SEO will make you relevant to … | |
Re: It sounds like you already plan to have each domain contain a small and unique website that focuses on a brand, then pushes visitors to the main website. That is one of the best ways to handle multiple domains, however, you are creating a lot of work for yourself. Building, … | |
Re: These are major algorithm changes by Google. Big enough they were named! Normally after one of these updates there's a big frenzy as people complain about lost PageRank or changes how their website performs. | |
Re: Canonical Links are used to get round a problem of duplicate content due to a single page having more than one valid URL. As an example, it is common that a home page can be accessed through several URLs: [B]www. website.com website.com www. website.com/index.htm website.com/index.htm[/B] These may all produce the … | |
Re: Option b. Your meta description is often used by Google as the snippet for your search result. It should provide info about the page it represents. | |
Re: not with most search engines like Google. Explain what you mean by "static" | |
| |
Re: The public PageRank is available from Google's toolbar and is a score from 0 to 10. It's best to call the is the Toolbar PageRank. Google uses and keeps it's own private PageRank that is far more accurate and upto date. This is what is used as one of the … | |
Re: Try [URL="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal"]Google Adwords External Keyword Tool[/URL] | |
Re: Googles new system seems to index things a lot faster than in the past. There's no harm in giving google a kick via a sitemap submission or some social bookmarking (like digg) to your new pages. I have found a quick twitter about a new page can often get it … | |
Re: This is often a trick. The high page rank site may be on its last legs and they are milking it. Do some research on the website. whois, wayback and see if it has recently changed. | |
Re: Get other websites to link to you. The higher their page rank the better. Google PageRank (tm) is based on that. | |
Re: I feel that promoting RSS feeds via these re-publishing systems have little direct SEO benefit as they are just creating duplicate content. However they do create new avenues for people to find your website. | |
Re: Could you clarify "less". Are they showing less than before? (Did you change anything) How Many? | |
Hi, I've been into computers and software since I was knee high to a grasshopper, before the PC and Mac. It's not all geek though. I've done a lot of travelling, socialising and have been known to appreciate the odd beer. I'm currently living in Australia where I have started … | |
Re: Your sitemap is just a hint for google and not an instruction on what pages google should index. Google will still crawl all links into and within your website to find pages. If any of them lead to a missing page then WMT will tell you with the 404 error. … | |
Re: Yahoo is about to switch to using a completely new system so I'd wait till that happens and see if things are better. | |
Re: How are you checking that Google has indexed your pages? If you are using the "site:" search option then this is well known to only provide a subset of the full index. A more reliable test is to use the "cache:www.website.com/page.htm" search option and see if Google has cached the … |
The End.