Posts by rproffitt

Not yet. /somefolder takes me to the Site root and no need for the .. here. Also if I see it right ../images being the root is at / (Site Root) you would be trying to get to tutsSCSS which has no images folder. Besides it should allow access above Site Root.

Something's off here. You did call out the images folder so did
background-image: url('pitch-s4b17d3ee2e.png'); work?

Second thought. If the images folder is used, then indeed you could use "../images"

For this I had to read http://blog.grayghostvisuals.com/css/image-url/ again. Since the root is simply / there is no reason to think you can jump above / with a ../ here. So what is ../ to / ?

I think this is nearly impossible. I had an IT staffer that wanted to do this and told them it wasn't possible today. Why? Tools like NTPASSWD make resetting the local admin a snap. Yes it got a little harder with the new BIOS (EFI) but not a big hurdle.

All this has us recalling what a PC is. It's a personal computer and not a terminal. If you need to get absolute control you may have to look at thin clients and such.

Think context. Use your account instead of system. I'm sure this has been kicked around many times, since IE is in some non-gui instance, you may find sending keystrokes to fail.

Maybe your goal is to log into a site daily or something. Maybe there are other ways like telnet and other scripts.

Just a thought. Since IE is not usually used for non-interactive tasks, SYSTEM may be the wrong user context.
Also, the new security noted at https://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/docs/libfunctions/_IECreate.htm can cause the browser to ask a question and you are not there to answer.

PS. This is mainly a guess here. I'm not there to see and duplicate this setup. But I'll share the above and hope.

@fallout4player. I supplied examples of the framerates you are seeing. It looks to me it's working as expected.

This sounds like our old file association issues. Google up Doug Knox XP Association fixes and look at the .exe one to start with since you can't launch apps.

And a note about getting apps. Read http://www.howtogeek.com/201354/ninite-is-the-only-safe-place-to-get-windows-freeware/ since so many apps you get from the web are boobytrapped.

Here's the search I used.

I did help. I noted it does not look to be in HTML so you get to write some javascript.

Now I would be guessing you want folk here to write your code for you. So far I don't see that a lot. I see you are asked to try writing it or sometimes folks will point a way out of the forest. I did that by mentioning writing a javascript to fill in where HTML stopped. That's helping.

If I wrote that for you I would not be helping you. I'd be doing your work for you.

Then look at the HTML source. That is the language. Nothing there seems to tell the browser to hide the destination.

As to script, you write that. The basic idea is to respond to the image click and then move on. Some folk want others to write their code but here I rarely see that. Ideas on how, yes.

As to folk questioning your intent, that will happen. It's just shady programming. No reason to hide such and you may get less hits if you do this.

Let's read a bit about the Intel HD 3000 test results. http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-3000.37948.0.html shows a sea of red with many zeros and single digit results. What made you think this graphics solution was better?

It's not the CPU at issue here, it's the graphics solution (which is, well, how to write nice here?)

What is this 512MB? Directions unclear. If system RAM, you must be a very patient person.

Such a bad idea. Hiding the destination would put me on alert the site has something to hide or is trying to take me to a very bad place.

My advice is to not spend time on such and apply work to make your site the best it can be.

While I have my suspicions I don't know your PC. Try finding what locked the file with "handle." See link.

Also, try 7zip. I used that last month on some rar thing.

Found a better prior discussion on engine sound generation. http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/a/3344

This sounds like you need to research web game sound engines. Try these. https://www.google.com/#q=web+game+sound+engine

Still sounds like one line using grep. Not to pry, but you do use grep?

Why code this when grep could do that in one line?

https://www.linode.com/docs/tools-reference/search-and-filter-text-with-grep

I think we need to take a step back here. The IP address does not contain the MAC address. However there was a need to increase the MAC address pool for IPv6. "Guidelines for 48-Bit Global Identifier (EUI-48)" (PDF). IEEE Standards Association. IEEE. Retrieved 16 April 2015 gives a great overview of this.

So let's recap.

ARP for IPv4 to get the MAC.
NDP for IPv6 to get the new EUI.

Does not look to be a two way street. That is, it's a method we can use to automatically configure IPv6 host addresses. An IPv6 device will use the MAC address of its interface to generate a unique 64-bit interface ID. However, this doesn't mean that a DHCP assigned address will contain that MAC address.

Plugin or "out of the box"? Anyhow https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wordpress+file+sharing+theme finds the usual 2 but the site you want to emulate looks to do so much more.

Sorry about that. My mistake. That change would only change the scope.

Think it over. Line 8 is in the script so it may have never run. Try line 8 after line 10.

It may not be any single IP. Take a read of http://hexus.net/tech/news/software/81661-microsoft-use-p2p-distribute-windows-10-os-app-updates/ and do more research on that. If all you need is this for this one time, allow all for that time period.

Yes, your topic is "Verify if data sent by servers? How do bigger companies do that?" so we get to dive into a lot of the MITM.

Later you clarify the messages are not coming from servers and we are now in the weeds as you now have a new topic.

I like what ryantroop wrote but you need to be clearer next time. You lead with data sent by servers and changed that to something else.

My note about Lavabit is to start to learn why we don't have airtight crypto on everything. Even with your reply it's not off topic at all. It's a big topic until you re-state your topic and question. Writing a secure comm is one thing, and here I think it best you try again with a more refined topic and question. As it stands your data reply is not from a server. Try again. I will.

This sounds like a job for OnChange. You can find much about it on the web such as http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/forms/_INPUT_onChange.html

@A,
You lead with "Verify if data sent by servers?" and have changed to where the user is sending the data. There is no accepted ironclad secure comms today. You may askself why this is and the answer is out there for you to read. Start by reading the Wikipedia on Lavabit.

Governments do not want unbreakable cypto. If you want to create such a thing, go right ahead but use what happened to Lavabit to foresee what may happen next.

Formatting sticks? GPT? It sounds like the sticks were not made using prior advice on web pages that have those distros.

While we need to know our PC in regards to UEFI and BIOS settings what you wrote makes me wonder if you made a good bootable stick. Test? Does it boot in other PCs?

@A,

Stick with HTTPS. To understand why man in the middle attacks are hard we would have to hold a class on it all. There are long priors such as https://www.google.com/#q=https+man+in+the+middle+attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-in-the-middle_attack and then we have SuperFish.

Now you could create your own checks but for most, https will do.

L,
Be sure that bootable USB works in another PC. I lost a day fussing about USB boot and I had the old YDIAW issue. Back to the web for another way to create the USB and it was working.

This doesn't mean you may have other issues such as dealing wth UEFI.

Try a very common reset. Unplug power, remove battery, hold power button for 60 seconds, release, slip in battery, apply power, wait a few seconds and then try again.

You may want to remove the HDD and retry.

Try other browsers on the phone. I tend to find the stock browser to be buggy so I install Chrome and look again. You will find that trying to support all browsers a losing battle.

If you didn't recover this in the past year, it's gone. You asked this question on Dec 9, 2013 at
http://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28314072/Recovering-MS-Word-2010-Document.html

Or you are a shill.

Glad you found it was one of the usual.

Well, yes. Since you noted registry I dug up this old thing. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20060222-11/?p=32193
That's 200,000 cycles so here I notice W10 to be more spry in that area. You may also see changes in .NET CLR performance across platforms. Not to mention other things like CPU, RAM, HDD and an antivirus that examines registry access.

Wish it was one thing, but it's not.

That didn't work for me. What did work was to run 7 then take the offer for the 10 upgrade. After 10 is running the PC is now marked as "good for 10" with a hardware hash so no key is required.

Now the clean install works.

Your method is not one I found to work.

Did you read prior answers like https://www.daniweb.com/programming/software-development/threads/56000/simply-question-how-do-i-return-a-string-from-a-function

That's been something of a Holy Grail quest by IT for decades now. The problems are still the same so did you standardize your PC hardware? It matters since that image usually BSODs as you change almost anything on the next PC.

-> Let me share something that really helps. Go find Ninite.com.

And then google about Office Unattended Installs.

So is this a new issue? Your topic is "i have 5 imges and lightgallery shows 6 images." If you have a new issue, state it in a new thread so we can tackle that.

That's the same code as above. Sorry but you need to think about your for loop harder.

An array of 5 items is indexed from 0 to 4. You have it from 0 to 5 so that's not 5 but 6. Keep thinking, you'll get it soon.

If you have 5 items and then loop 0 to 5. That's one too many.

Your choice of -1 or change i<= to i< whichever you can wrap your head around. The right way would be to drop the = sign but the key item is for you to think of the array count is one number and arrays start at zero so think about that.

for(var i =0;i<=imagesarray.length-1;i++){

Changed line 12?

Is this the famous? 2 USD keyboard? My thought is you need to take it as a lesson about cheap things and try another keyboard.

It looks like your array is 5 in size. So you can put 0 to 4 in the reference and 5 is too much. Fix or cheat? Create a six element array?
I can't guess where you are in learning to code but my view is to understand arrays better. If it's a one off piece of code you are not submitting to review, just make it work.

Here's a thing. Outlook Express didn't come with Windows 7. You may have found a way to run it, but you are out on a limb in some tree in the desert. Without you backing up all the time you may get a hard knock when the limb breaks.

I know folk that love that old email system but my advice is to move to Thunderbird and never run on PCs without backups of what you can't lose.

Quick answer.

On line 30 I see integer division so try 100000.0

Also, print out your variables so you can see what's up.

I see more tag writers at http://id3.org/Implementations
For some this may mean too many choices.

PS. Sorry if you want source code. You can peruse the list at the link and see if they provide that. Some appear to do that.

Here's what I do. I order it on Ebay since a call to Dell costs more than the part. As to Dell in your country, hit dell.com and check where that takes you. Dell, if they have an office in your country would then be found and called. I don't know if you notice but not all things are on the web or done via email.

@kouty. Actually I found the discussion useful as I needed a refresher on Unicode. I hope you come back but one thing. Try to put the question mark on your question next time. I thought the question was why the 48 showed up, and not that you wanted some way from Unicode to say Ascii or other character. That is where I mussed up.

@kouty. To me your question was why the 48 and such showed up. If we read the article then we see that number and learn more about unicode. The one thing I didn't see in your post is a clear question. You may be thinking in 8 bits?