Yep - The click of death. You can try putting the HD in the freezer for an hour then retrying to read data.... Seriously this sometimes works...but it's probably dead.
Best do what xp78user said, buy a new HD, load an OS, and restore your files.
Did you map them before by IP, DNS name, or netbios name? Did you replicate the method exactly.
Off the top of my head you could have 2 issues here. 1) The method used to map the drive is not setup on the workstation. i.e. \server.here.local\share doesn't map because the workstation is using wrong dns, maybe an invalid hosts file entry. 2) Server load... if you have 100 PCs each mapping mulitple drives all at the same time of the morning (logon time), perhaps the guest os or host os is under load
To expand... for windows, get a free program called putty.exe. This lets you create an ssh session. You need the IP address or dns name of the server you want to hit. SSH usually runs on port 22 by default.
Don't use telnet, passwords are sent in cleartext.
You know that you don't just copy a pst into the folder, you need to tell outlook to load the pst ... Tools -> Account Settings -> Data Files . Then you give outlook the location of the pst file.
The lag will not come from your internal network. The lag is produced when your traffic hops around the internet through other comanies' routers. Traffic to your gateway will almost always be <10ms. It's only when your traffic leaves your network, do you get longer delays.
If you are looking for better gaming... you'll have to get a house closer to where the game servers are located.
Remember, you are limited by your ISP's bandwidth. IF you have a 20 Mbps down connection, that is slower than current wifi and definately slower than 100 or 1000 Mbps of an ethernet connection. There would be no difference when using the PS4 on internet traffic. You would see a difference inside the network when you get device to device communications like when you send files from PC to PC, but won't matter for the PS4.
A Good iSCSI drive array is probably cheaper then an entire MS Server buildout. The iSCSI volume can be mapped up to the main server and appear as attached storage.
You can also go with an iSCSI or NAS array with CIFS support so it can share out space directly to clients without the need to go through a server.
If you are on the cheap, NAS4Free or opennas are opensource products. Run 2 in a replicated 'cluster' and you get space and failover.
You are only allowed to use port forwarding to virtual servers. In your case I imaging you want to forward tcp 1 to 1023 to the internal host on 1 to 1023 as well.
BTW, this is one of the most annoying trends. ATT Uverse does this also... the modems they ship now do almost the exact same thing while leaving a high port listening for signals from ATT for whatever they use it for.
Do you have a linux machine handy? You can always dd the drive to another hard drive as a backup copy before you go messing with it if you are extra paranoid about the data too.
How are you accessing the printer? Direct to IP, Bonjour, Windows share? IF this is on a network, it sounds like you didn't set it up... do you have an admin that can explain it to you?
You can't use 2 public IPs like that since the server can only have 1 gateway at a time without some type of failover mechanism or a router with that filover mechanism.
Best bet for HA is to use 2 servers running same code and use a DNS round robin, Dynect, or some other dns load balancer to sene traffic both ways.
HE probably has wifi enabled on both the router and ISP modem. i.e. U-verse modem/router has wifi enabled by default. If the router went from what seems like a bridge mode (he had it in WAN) to a router mode (now it works in router LAN ports), then it's not a stretch to think that the wifi was also re-enabled (Rebooting laptop connects to modem wifi now).
75% of the devs in our shop use MACs, split between mavericks and yosemite. The other 25% run Ubuntu or Mint. We have no devs running windows as the primary OS at all. Windows is relegated to the Assistants, the C levels and VPs, and accounting basically.
A mac is good. A pc running a linux distro is also good and much cheaper.
I think he means can a PC be joined to a network automatically.
There are ways to automate the process through pre built images, but unless you are deploying many machines per day or have machines all over the country, it is really much easier just to pop in and id/pw to join a pc to a domain.
Just my 2 cents here... I run Atlassian Jira/Confluence. Installing and running this on an ubuntu 14.04 was much easier than running on Windows. Have you evaluated using a linux platform instead?
Exactly... remember that in 'bridge mode', the router ceases to be a router and becomes basically a connecter of the 2 networks. It neither has IP info, nor does it need any DHCP or dns information. It is now only passing traffic.
This cable is probably a remnant from the cable TV. You don't know where the cable leads or if it is connected anyway right? Don't assume the cable is live and waiting for you.
Sounds like your DSL modem is in router mode. First thing is to see if your DSL modem has a bridge mode or has an option for a router behind router mode. This way your netgear becomes your permimeter device.
Second, on your netgear you need to create the port forward on your IP camera listening port from the outside to the internal camera ip at 10.0.0.64
At my current company, the 50% of the mac population rushed to yosemite like the good little mac-fanboys they are claiming it's "better, sleeker, more streamlined". Not a week goes buy before I'm bombarded with shit like "my mail won't collect messages, my test labs dont work, office is having issues, can I revert?".
This whole push to a 'flat' style desktop is the most annoying trend I can think of.
Stop making eveything 'transparent' for a 'coolness' effect... all you are doing is using up processing cycles for no reason... go back to solid window colors.
Stop making things appear and dissappear... Window borders and scroll bars actually have multiple uses.
You need a router sitting between the 2 DSL drops and your internal network.
Inside you run 2 subnets, 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24. Rrouter interface is 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1 which will serve as the gw for each subnet. Get a router that can do policy based routing and you can send all traffic that originates from 1.0 to DSL drop 1 and all traffic that originates from 2.0 to DSL drop 2.
Linksys had an RVO42 model router years ago that supported dual Internet... probably been replaced with a newer model by now. The trick here is finding a router that will route based on source IP.
Is upnp enabled on the router? Try turning it off as a sanity check. DO you run any virtual hosts on the same server? Perhaps a virtual host is grabbing the port somehow.
That makes no sense. Unless something else inside the network is trying to upnp a port on the router automatically but somehow the host is receiving the traffic... ??
ISP is not involved here. We have determined from previous steps that the ISP and router are forwarding packets correctly and that this host is receiving them.
This host is not configured correctly or is serving up a web page not from another application on the same port.
The conf file you sent looks ok, so unless you have other conf files in sites-enabled or elsewhere in the 'include' directories or perhaps a 2nd apache process running, then I am at a loss.
Lines 62 and 63 show the listening on all IPs on port 80. Then you have another include on line 556. In that directory, do you have any additional conf files?
