Posts by happygeek

Asking Google that question sees this answer at hit number two on the first page.

Every Wi-Fi network transmits and receives data on a certain frequency, or channel. As Wi-Fi data is digital, many different devices can communicate successfully on the same channel.

The full, detailed, response being found here: https://support.zen.co.uk/kb/Knowledgebase/Broadband-Understanding-Wireless-Channels

Hope that helps.

Brilliant. If you (previous two posters) are going to use the same IP to create two different accounts so you can post as two different people, at least try and remember to post different things rather than just throw the same few words at the screen eh?

Can't see how you can be unsure if Overclockers is referring to onboard graphics capabilities when the information I have quoted comes from a section titled onboard graphics...

According to Overclockers the motherboard supports up to 3 displays:

• Multi-VGA output support: HDMI/DVI-D/RGB port
• Supports HDMI with max. resolution 4096 x 2160@24Hz / 2560 x 1600@60Hz
• Supports DVI-D with max. resolution of 1920 x 1200 @60Hz
• Supports RGB with max. resolution 1920 x 1200@60Hz

Surely if you do this stuff for a living you would already know this? Do your paying clients know that you don't know this?

1. You need to be way more specific in what it is, precisely, you are looking for.

2. See 1.

You say "I know that SEO is continuous" which kind of answers the question you later pose of "do I need to continue doing SEO" doesn't it?

Go to Android settings|Sound & notification|App notifications and then go through the apps one by and block those you don't want nortifications from. This may take some time depending on how many apps you have installed of course...

Are you referring to the Netskope report, which actually talks about malware in general being prevalent 'in the cloud' and that much of it is in the form of ransomware delivery vehicles? Or something more specific?

How do I learn web development as quickly as possible?

Hypnotism.

That is a very broad subject, and one that you will have to narrow down if you really expect to get any meaningful advice about.

I have removed the links from your post as they are not required in order to answer the question, and they could put some off of answering as they appear spammy.

Personally, I would have to agree with rproffitt in that if you can get better with practice then practice. If you can't get better with practice then hire in the talent you need as you need it.

You ask what you should focus on in your second post, something you have already answered in your first: look for great websites on the web and see what they are doing, play around with some designs and try to figure out how to do it better.

Congratulations. You have passed the 'I can cut and paste my homework question' test. Shame you will probably fail your class though, if you think others will do your work for you.

Especially as I note this was your second cut and paste in a matter of minutes - I've deleted the other one and infracted you under our rules. See them here: "provide evidence of having done some work yourself if posting questions from school or work assignments."

Here at DaniWeb we expect you to show us your code, explain when you are stuck and then maybe someone will be able to help you.

We are not here to do your homework for you though...

Just post your question in the programming section and use a 'career' tag like you have here.

We don't do your homework for you.

So, to move things forward, you'll need to be more specific than simply posting your assignment question and expecting others to do it for you.

Show us the code you have produced so far, and tell us where you are getting stuck, and then maybe someone can help...

Dear troll, I am now closing this thread. Please go have your fun elsewhere.

Write a question, in plain English, that explains exactly what problems you are having with your homework assignment. Reveal the code that you have prepared so far, and point to the areas where those problems are occuring.

Alternatively, refer to the rules: "provide evidence of having done some work yourself if posting questions from school or work assignments"

Don't waste your time. The OP has posted a bunch of questions and answered them using another acountm, and vice-versa. It's a spam bait and respond thing in the making, most likely waiting for the sig facility to kick in.

"Sorry"
Apology accepted.

"Who is this"
What, have you forgotten if you are using the williamsmith007 or anthonydaniel account?

Oh, look, here he is with an answer to his own question right on cue...

Why are you answering your own, inane, questions?

Highlight files you want to delete. Press delete.

Unless you mean how to securely erase them of course, which is a different matter.

By the way, stop using two newly created accounts: one to post these questions and another to answer them. Admins/Mods can see your full IP address, and when you joined, and where from etc etc.

Well, you previously asked:

Can Any body gives the answer of these questions?
1. Make subdirectories called work and play.
2. Delete the subdirectory called work.
3. Copy the file /etc/passwd into your home directory.
4. Move it into the subdirectory play.
5. Change into subdirectory play and create a symbolic link called terminal that
points to your tty device. What happens if you try to make a hard link to the tty
device?
6. What is the difference between listing the contents of directory play with ls -l and ls -L?
7. Create a file called hello.txt that contains the words "hello world". Can you
use "cp" using "terminal" as the source file to achieve the same effect?
8. Copy hello.txt to terminal. What happens?

Sure looks like a lazy person to me...

Create a question that shows you have actually done some work yourself on this, what that work is and where you need help with it.

So far all you've shown is an ability to copy a homework question. Badly.

DaniWeb is not here to do your homework for you.

Everyone should use HTTPS is the answer.

Seriously, go read the wikipedia entry for HTTPS as a good enough basic overview of why.

Google even penalises those sites not using HTTPS in terms of ranking these days...

Erm, see this from last week: http://www.scmagazine.com/security-researchers-defeat-recaptcha/article/488236/

"The researchers said the system they had devised was “extremely effective”, automatically solving 70.78 percent of the image reCaptcha challenges, while requiring only 19 seconds per challenge."

Honestly, I couldn't really understand what it was he was getting at... Does he wear glasses/shades for fashion? To correct poor vision? Who knows? Who cares? ;-)

Stop being an a-hole would be good advice. Or do you think that cut and pasting copyright content as 'answers' to old threads is good publicity for either you or your website? Actually, don't answer that - you're banned. Goodbye.

Looking at the member profile it shows the username as Pavan_9 but his full name as Maverick2020.

I have been tidying up the mess left behind by the troll that was dttp, who has now been perma-banned, and that included deleting the negative reputation left by that account as I felt it wasn't fair on members to be negativelty impacted by the actions of a troll... I appear to have mistakenly removed a postive rep that dttp left for you,for which I apologise, however it would make no practical difference as that reputation (as you can see from all your remaining rep, all from dttp by the way) is worth 0 re points anyway.

Woj: Give it up. No amount of squirming is going to help you escape this one. IP alone means not a lot, IP in conjunction with everything else does. Random IP distribution would be hard pressed to find two trolls with the exact same outlook/MO, and as for living in the same block of flats... ditto (one would have killed the other by now). End of the day, we all know who you are and you know who you are. If you don't like that (and I wouldn't if I were Woj) then you know where the delete membership button is.

@dtpp/wojciech1 If you really want me to air your dirty washing in public here I will. Needless to say, most folk when accused of being someone else might say 'who?' or 'no I am not' rather than ask for proof. However, what are the chances of someone different but with the exact same troll attitude as a previous troll who was exposed on DaniWeb as a liar (claiming to run a large and successful forum when the actual owner, who diafol spoke to at length, had never heard of the chap) and the exact same modus operandi (slagging off DaniWeb and Dani, claiming to know how best to run it, making demands etc etc) accessing DaniWeb from the exact same IP address in Poland?

In case anyone is in any doubt, here is a typical Woj the Troll post from six months ago:

I like to be able to say freely what I think is not done right/what I dislike and why. To keep things clear - if I were Dani, I'd run DW differently - Id pay more attention to what users have to say (as of correcting/introducing features) etc. How many of things suggested by me in Feedback section has been implemented? None. That shows attitude Dani has. I requested alot there. I'll not praise Dani for doing nothing. Thats not that I dont like praising, I just dont see what Dani should be praised for.... This webapp is full of unfinished features (have a …

Oh, and @dtpp or should I say wojciech1 do you still want to deny being a troll?

@dtpp: Voicing your opinion is good. Ignoring everything that comes back in response to your opinion, which doesn't meet your world view, isn't. You continue to respond with the 'roll it back' line, over and over. You continue to suggest that this should be done because 'a group of users' has demanded it when, in fact, a handful of users have said they don't like the new system and even less have called for it to go back to how it was. You wilfully refuse to accept that taking business decisions upon the demands of one or two vocal users, even a small group if your prefer that terminology, would be rash at best and stupid in the eyes of most folk. You continue to state assumptions as fact, despite being told you are factually wrong. These are the reasons I have you down as troll material...

No, it isn't only you. However, neither is it a majority of DaniWeb members or anywhere near it. So far, since the chnages went live, no more than a dozen people have posted anything to say they don't like it. Of those, their initial concerns were tempered by changes that Dani made in response to their reasonable suggestions and they went on to say they were OK with it as a result.

What is only you, however, is someone who simply keeps repeating "I don't like it, change it back. I don't like it, change it back" while refusing to engage in any meaningful dialogue beyond that. And, for the record, we don't include 'Dani doesn't know what she is doing' or 'you are all ignorant' as being meaningful.

Who is saying 'no because of no' exactly?

I repeat, go back and read what Dani has said already. She has made the reasons for changing to the tagging system quite clear, you have apparently chosen to ignore those. Fair enough, that's your perogative. However, you are now sounding more and more just like a troll that requires feeding...

And, for the record, DaniWeb has been one of the most responsive of sites that I've ever been involved with when it comes to listening to users and making changes based upon that input. However, that doesn't mean that everything you say should happen is going to happen, nor should it.

@dtpp: "And big yes - business (especially the one which deals with users) will be quickly down if they do not listen to what users (no matter how many of them) have to say......."

Here we go again. OK, so you have put your case for the system to roll back as it was, we implement that according to your view of how business should work. Great. Then someone else comes along and says, actually I preferred the new system, so we should then swap back to that right? Do you not see the complete and total folly in what you are arguing for?

@dtpp: "Dont say that Dani always actively measuring how changes impact upon traffic, and bases her decisions upon that and other factors. Its simply not true here; or Dani does not know how to do it correctly"

Christ on a bike, really? And you know this how? I've known Dani for close on 10 years. I have been an admin here for close on 10 years. I know what Dani does a lot better than you.

@dtpp: "if I saw that changes I made caused drop in activity, Id roll them back without hesitation"

Again, your selective reading process has filtered out the parts where Dani has mentioned that traffic has risen since the changes were implemented, not dropped.

@dtpp: "people dont like it"

Correction, some people don't like. In fact, I think the total number who have said they don't like it on DaniWeb is less than a dozen...

@dtpp: "if she shows her ability to listen"

I suggest you eat your own dogfood here (take your own advice) and do the same.

@dtpp: "why not stop this by doing what we want? Any reason for this?"

Do you seriously think that any site, any business, would run best if it made changes at the behest of a handful of users every time they asked for those changes?

Welcome Javier, someone who is always learning is never a dummy...

Apart from three which were all grabbed from the web and pasted wholesale, one not even relevant to the question as he obviously knows jack shit. Now banned.

You could look at the dates of the posts you are commenting upon. I doubt he's still looking for SEO help some FOUR YEARS later. If he is, then all hope is lost.

In which case I'm thinking that the "provide evidence of having done some work yourself if posting questions from school or work assignments" rule applies here...

Australia, Ireland, South Africa and Argentina all looking good at the moment. At least NZ have some proper competition.

Not inlcuding Wales in there, Alan, purely as I think the squad is too depleted right now and wasn't playing that well at full strength to start with. We will see if that turns out to be the case when they take on Aus next week as you say.

Nothing to say about that England performance, other than there was no performance in it. <correction> unless you include pantomime </correction>

Welcome, but take a minute and read the rules before posting as it will help prevent you from posting any more thinly disguised spam. In particular take note of "ensure that all posts contain relevant content and substance and are not simply vehicles for external links" - hint: someone with a signature declaring they are a web design company in India should not be posting a 'question' asking which is the best web design company in India.

There is no 'new sandbox' just a new name for the same old, same old that's been around for the longest time to help in the anti-spam fight here.

How about devil horns above the avatar for a mod, and angel wings for admins of course? ;-)

Uruguay. WTF? More like :)

Well it won't be England based upon that performance against Wales. I mean, WTF was Lancaster thinking? WTF was Robson thinking? Was anyone left on the England side with 15 minutes to go thinking at all, in fact? I can't get my head around why Lancaster took off all the people who were playing really well, winning England that game, apparently just becuase that was the scheduled time for some other chaps to have a go. I can't get my head around why Robson, with quite a history of making fundamentally wrong decisions at critical times that have cost the match, chose to kick to the corner. I can't get my head around why England cannot play with the passion and determination of Wales.

What I do know is that without that drive, that passion, that will to win at all costs, England ain't winning this world cup (in fact I doubt they will make it out of the pool of death).

Beyond the obvious NZ choice for back-to-back wins, I'd say that both Ireland and (despite that Japanese loss) South Africa are looking good for the final. Wales, sadly, have too many injuries and even though I've said they have the passion and mindset required to win, they made way too many mistakes in that game against England up until the final quarter...

I spoke too soon...