Posts by canadafred

But can you tell what is white hat SEO according to your knowledge.

Did you actually take the time to read what you wrote? Looks like something some third world content replicator would puke out.

And your question. What in the world has it to do with your post? The only answer that any human being on the planet could give would be: yes. In fact, according to anyone's knowledge they can tell anything.

If your post is an indication as to what your content looks like then I suggest you go on a frantic search for links. Dump your links everywhere, beg like mad; do as much link building as you can and in as many different ways as possible.

You have no other options; except maybe to take a crash course in effective writing.

You More Focus on Free Classified, Forum Posting and Social book marking its very helpful to your website

In other words Vrinsoft is telling you to get link building and here are some good linking strategies that I assume are working well for him.

My opinion only folks, link strategists are SEO weenies.

Look within your own web pages. Adopt an SEO strategy that is all within your own control. Your web pages. Look there to increase the importance of your content. Look within.

No, it is meant that each of these two search engines' have some varying ways of ranking web sites and differing tolerances to various link manipulation schemes.

I had a quick look. Without any further information I think I can still take a good guess at what the problem is.

Seems to me like you probably have too many similarly appearing web pages whereas the search engine doesn't find the content sufficiently unique one from the other. There's a large percentage (I'd say 97%) of the web page elements that's exactly identical one to the other. Look at it like your web site unknowingly triggers the content duplication sensors.

The web sites have a well-structured internal linking system, have at least 10 webpages and have some links that Google omits to display because of their insignificant value.

If you think the web pages have been banned by Yahoo, I'd be asking myself questions like what I did to raise Google PR that Yahoo dislikes so much.

I must conclude, from what little information you have supplied us with, it appears likely that you probably have participated in some kind of trashy link building strategy. Unfortunately, most of these link popularity boosting strategies are quite difficult to undo.

You haven't come up with any pot of gold. This is quite common. I've seen google index my blog articles within 12 hours of posting them and then display new links to the same articles within 24 hours.

The days of waiting, sweating and worrying about when the spider will show up are over.

Ya pretty cool tool.

Can't any of you write in English. In real SEO, not these trendy link manipulation empowering schemes, copywriting is of paramount importance. A real SEO, in the English world, is an artist with words who paints his web content into his pages in a way that not only intrigues the search engine but also captivates the Internet visitor.

You can try putting on shaded glasses, maybe a blue pair would work well.

No. Seriously. You should ask this question in a Web Development forum, you'd probably have a better chance there of getting a good answer. I'm surprised this forum's moderator hasn't moved your post for you.

a higher rank means you have more links and hence more traffic coming to your site. This benefits your business as you will then get potential clients.

That is so untrue. Most links built in an effort to attain higher PR aren't meant for people to click at all. Having more useless links than your keyphrase competitor does not mean you'll gain a larger volume of traffic to the web pages than he, nor does it mean gaining more business for the owner.

In order to get qualified visitors (people looking for your product or service and finding you in their search results) web pages need to rank highly in the search engine results pages for keyphrases that people are searching for. PR has very little to do with where the search engine positions web pages. PR is only one factor in a thousand that the search engine uses to determine which are the best webpages for a search.

Qualified traffic is what makes the telephone ring. Gain qualified traffic in an honest fashion (by optimizing your webpage elements and its content) and you'll sleep good at night.

You sound desperate William. You have some tough lessons ahead of you.

The best method to get high quality natural links is to create something worth linking to. You can fill your waste bucket full of blog spam links, garbage directories listings, useless articles submissions etc. and be slightly rewarded for it too but there is nothing more powerful than gaining links based on the quality of your web content. When people like what they see and read they share it.

That's my opinion based on over ten years in the search engine game. I've seen the trendy search engine manipulation tactics come and go. The link strategists are worried today because their mass link production babies are basically ineffective now.

Build great web content that doesn't require artificial external empowerement. Forget about link building schemes geared to make your content appear to be important. Simply build important content.

You gotta' watch out for duplicate web page elements. For example, it's easy to generate web pages that have two Titles or two opening and closing <html> tags. Stuff like that.

But is Separate domain considered as separate site?

I haven't had to deal with that situation before but I would think that it depends mostly on how you have the sub-domain linking to the root domain. If no links are exchanged then it is safe to think the search engine will treat them separately.

hello,
I have seen some sites with different Sub domains for different services.what is the use of it?

Essentially they serve to separate the services. It can be easier to manage the webpages on the server in this way.

There can also be a slight SEO advantage with regards to naming convention.

Well. Maybe you could start by writing some important unique content for your web site, stuff that people want to read. Then maybe you can optimize the different web page elements (Titles, Descriptions, headings etc.) for each webpage. That should get you started in the right direction.

we are using 10 different strategists for link so do not take us as easy way ...

That was almost intelligible.

10 linkers eh? Must be able to pump out maybe a few thousand links a week with a band of linkers like that. You guys are pip-squeaks in comparison to your SEO colleagues over there.

You gotta' be kidding me right. You have a web site (in your signature) filled with stuff about web design, SEO, programming etc and you post rediculous questions in manner similar to how a five year old would.

First and foremost, the Meta Keywords tag is a search engine tag. It's importance as an indicator varies. In some cases, it is very important as the search engine may have trouble picking out the important keyphrases within the content, in other cases it is of no value whatsoever as the content clearly highlights the web page's important keyword phrases.

I would concern myself more with the Meta description tag, another search engine tag. Rewriting descriptions can greatly affect keyphrase performance in the results pages.

Wrong question. Now you have just incited the linking strategists to tell you a bunch of crap. Don't listen to it!

99% of the best SEO you can get exclusively revolves around working the various web page elements. The off-page factors (links) take care of themselves and are hardly even needed provided you have done the on-page work effectively. By this I mostly am talking about your actual web content.

This whole speal makes little sense at all to me. I even read it twice.

I'm still shaking my head wondering what the heck this is about.

Your babbling would be more credible if you took the time to learn how to write in English.

If you were any good at SEO then you wouldn't be spamming this forum for work.

I realize that you won't reply to this but tell me, how many link strategists are there in India? Do you guys have like armies of link schemers and link clickers roaming the mountainside in fly-by-night tent cities?

I think I better go dig out my bong.

Well, you read wrong. Adding video may help the Internet visitor get a better understanding of your web site and that's important but it won't have any effect on Google PageRank. Adding video is a good idea though; after all, what's the use in getting a visitor from the search engine if the user won't be encouraged to make a phone call. If video amplifies the visitor's experience then add it.

There's no such thing as SEO page rank. The purpose of a blog is to give a more behind the scenes look into your business and business ideas. Every article you write will create unique content. This is what the search engines like; unique content. Throw a link to your important web pages here and there so as to gel the blog with the website and both will help each other in the search engine results pages.

Yep, that pretty well covers it nowadays. Nothing fancy. Good content development and a little marketing know-how will go a long way into drawing potential customers to a web site.

I'd keep your money and spend more time developing better quality web content and then develop more of it. In essence, this is doing your own SEO.

There's something here you are not telling us.

A quality link is one worth offering your Internet visitor for perusal.

Most dynamically generated pages are easily crawled by the search engine. The search engine shouldn't reward one type of file more than the other provided that it can find the content within the webpage.

Rather than depend on external sources to empower your web content, how about just developing meaningful web content.

Most directory links are of little value and are basically useless to both the search engine and the Internet visitor.

That is what I figured I am just gonna hire someone

Seems to me you are wasting your time posting repetitively.

Concentrate on building your web site. Make your content outstanding in comparison with your keyphrase competitors. The search engine will come around to liking what you have created and will eventually reward you for your web content's uniqueness and authoritativeness.

Naturally evolve. Don't listen to the short-cut takers whose advice will only provide temporary spikes. Get to the top and stay at the top!

1 method? well, that's pretty hard. It's like choosing a best among the best. I will focus first on listing my page on Search Engines. =)

What a complete waste of time you are focusing on. Focus on smoking a big fatty then create something worthwhile for the Internet visitor.

You gotta be kidding me right?

Can't get work based on your existing SEO product, you have to go around the Internet posting nonsense like this.

Ya, go visit the linking page and ask yourself if it was worth visiting.

Ranking fluctuations are basically caused by two things:

1. Google uses various datacenters to provide search results. Each of them has crawled the web differently and has determined what is important differently.

2. Google is constantly adding and removing, visiting and revisiting, and ranking web pages from each of its datacenters. It sometimes goes through complete recrawls which can list weak webpages highly, temporarily until it has revalued the whole Internet.

In general, fluctuations will subside over a short period time ( a couple of months).

In my opinion, the most important thing is to create content worthy of a web visit. Get the keyowrds in there for sure but that is secondary to crafting web content that is both unique and indisputably authentic. Articles are good for that but should be used as an external ranking influence rather than masquerading as the real content (unless of course the content is articles; such as in a blog).

Forget about PageRank and acquiring PR value for your web pages. Pagerank is but one of many indicators the search engine uses in determining positioning of webpages in the search results.

Concentrate on improving your web site's contents. Grow your web site steadily.

The search engine will not like your scripting.

Way way too much Google Ads.

Content is good but the site seems not to be built with the visitor's best interest in mind as it is much too cluttered. Build for the visitor and then the search engine will like it.

My thought is to copy my home page and then personalize it for several states and link it back to my home page. Will this in any way jeopardize the ranking of my home page?

Although this could be an effective solution, it could easily be considered a duplicated content. It is always best to build web pages from scratch. You can use the homepage as a template but completely redo all the content.

Go to my blog linked from my signature and you'll find my Top 10 SEO tips. I can't put the link here as it will be removed by the moderator.

In essence though, concentrate on building high quality content and keep your web sites evolving.

Listen,

Develop the highest quality content possible. Examine your keyphrase competitors for a long time and outperform them by outclassing them with regularly evolving web pages. Pay close attention to your internal linking structure and don't try to artificially inflate your link popularity.

In time you web pages will start ranking highly in the search engine results and then you'll harnass highly qualified and targeted web visitors.

Don't rush as the search engine game never ends and rewards (telephone calls and emails from potential customers) come with patience and perserverence.

In my opinion, on-page optimization is much more important than off-site factors. Things off-site occur naturally when the on-site elements are better managed than the keyphrase competitors. Well-built and internally linked web pages will outperform mediocre content despite an advantage of artificially inflated link popularity.

On-site factors include some of what the previous response indicated but essentially means to develop the actual content to be the most visitor and therefore search engine friendly possible.

use-logical-naming-conventions.jpg (keywords), throw in a keyphrase in the alt attribute and get some keyphrase-rich textual content nearby.

1. Theoretically yes, provided there is little duplication. Create unique Titles for each page.

2. Theoretically yes, but keep the content of each blog posting as unique as possible and don't create them all in a day.

The object is to grow at a steady pace.

Use text instead of graphic text as the SE can find little of value to rank your web pages.

Your websites don't provide any details as to how you perform SEO.

There was a day not too long ago when this forum's moderator would have removed your advertising.

I have to ask myself what possesses someone to adverte SEO in an SEO forum. If you were any good at all in SEO then I would have already run across your work in my daily searches, but I haven't ever heard of you and your abilities to perform SEO.

To me you are seeking a short cut; an easy way to get higher ranking for your articles.

My advice is to just create articles, get them on feeds if you want to share them that way, but don't seek a linking advantage in doing so as you may not get the results you want.

Do what is natural. You don't need a bunch of useless links pointing out your unique and important content. Link will come naturally and they will be what is best to help propel keyphrases up the ranks.

Just make sure that you use all three of these tags in the head : keyword, description and title (not the meta title)