Posts by canadafred

Could be that the search engine implemented a better tracking mechanism that disallowed more crawlers (robots, spiders, data miners etc., aka Internet noise) than previously. Bots only require a fraction of a second to retrieve all the web page code and then they go away whereas a larger percentage of human traffic will increase visitor time because they take longer to digest a web page than a program does. Just a guess.

I think it is a question of building a quality web site with extraordinary evolving content. Supplement that with Social Media influences. Make sure your keyphrases are prominently present in your optimizable web page components (title, internal anchors, in paragraph, headings, logical naming of images and web pages, tag attributes etc.). Don't overdo it however. Make each page completely unique to the Internet. You writing must be immaculately crafted. Exercise the extent of the language using such language components as abbreviations, synonymous keyphrases, pluralization, altering prefixes and suffixes etc. Avoid excessive repetition of keyphrases within your content. Write intelligently. You may have to be innovative to overcome your keyphrase competitors but there is no question that indisputably important content will outlast spam.

I'm not really certain what the link jibberishing has anything to do with the real search engine optimization that requires no outside link manipulation mumbo jumbo abracadabra. goodby :) and the subsequent keyword targeting advice I think was meant to introduce the linker to the concept of seeking a larger volume of targeted SEARCHERS by using words they actually search rather than some zero search frequency obscure set of uncompetitve, unsearched for terms.

SEO - search engine optimisation (Google, Bing, Yahoo ...)
SMO - social media optimsation (Facebook, Youtube, Twitter ...)

Although separate disciplines, SEO and SMO are becoming increasingly more integrated.

I wouldn't be focused on trying to manipulate the search engine to respond favourably to keywords by abusing anchors. Build useful optimized web pages that impress the search engine for specific keywords (keyphrases more likely).

Make a real funny video with a catchy URL.

Ok. Here's an example or two of conversion goals. Your web page attracts a unique visitor. Now you want that visitor to go to your contact us page so he can call you for service. That could be a trackable goal. Another common conversion goal is to track web visitors that go to individual product pages ...

That's the problem with relying externally to empower your content because a link's value in relation to your content is constantly assessed and factored in every search. Link building ploys will never compare to the long term value of empowering your site internally using on-site optimization techniques.

Depending on the purpose of your blog articles. Are they meant to be unique, quality, new content for the Internet? Something intelligent to offer the world. If not, then duplicate to your hearts content and hope for the best.

... sounds to me like a new start-up ... SmutAdz or FreeFilth ... sorry couldn't help myself

Your question is a bit unclear. Please consider rewording it and resubmitting.

Link bleeding was once a concern optimisers had whenever they would supply a link to an external web page. It was thought that outgoing links would somehow cause for your web page to be devalued in Google PageRank (losing link juice). This theory fell aside to a new one which implied that lightly linking to external relevant web pages increases PR and therefore ranking.

The sub-domain needs to be found. Linking to it will get it indexed and ranked.

Well, this is a bit watered down but essentially ...

After a search term is entered, the first thing a search engine does is to assesses the search term and differentiates the nature intended of the search. It could be a map location, a video, a business listing, news ... After separating it's nature it then compares the term to every other web page it has discovered over time. It compares the value it awards for the search term on each page. It then decides, using hundreds of triggers, the most relevant results to provide in a results page.

SEO (search engine optimisation) encompasses a variety of on-site and off-site techniques that are deliberately deployed in an effort to enhance a web page's ranking in the search engine results pages for specifically searched terms (keywords).

So much misinformation regarding Google PageRank has permeated Internet marketing forums that it is no wonder newbies are confused. First of all, PageRank is attributed to web pages, not web sites. Secondly, Google PR has little if not absolutely nothing to do with how well a web page ranks in the search engine results pages. Indeed Google PageRank was originally awarded according to the number and quality of backlinks pointing to a web page but in the modern world, it is so inaccurate a measuring stick because of the socially accepted standard that link manipulation is part of search engine optimization. Just so that it is clear, PageRank technology was once a useful measuring stick as to what may be important web pages but after about a month in use it became completely exploited. Why Google keeps this dinosaur ongoing is simply to keep confusing you that it means something of value. Remember that the corporation's riches are made almost exclusively because hyperlinks so why would any corporation do away with such a lucrative illusion.

Having your focus on increasing your Google PageRank (PR) will not increase your rankings in the search engine results. As a matter of fact, dumping your web site's link all over forums is a very weak form of optimization. It may appear to work somewhat for a short time but it certainly won't sustain top rankings for keyphrases that are worth competiting for. In order to acquire higher rankings in the search engine results pages you'll have to produce web pages that are merit being highly ranked. In other words, concentrate of deploying optimized content on optimized pages rather than attempting to manipulate off-site ranking factors. Build stuff for the internet visitor to devour and pay as little attention to search engines as you can. I know it sounds ironic but the less you consider the search engine requirements the more they will appreciate your contribution to the Internet and so will your visitors. High quality, unique content is instrumental to long term, sustainable search engine success.

Other than the link building schemes I'd tend to agree with your list. I would however like to point out that page names that use words should have those words separated by hyphens and not underscores. For some reason the search engine prefers it that way (likely because it neater in appearance than underscore separators and because that's the way they do it with their own stuff).

You can remove a snippet of code within the <head> of the HTML document using an HTML editor or text editor. Save it then replace the old file on the server.

Moving web pages from one server to another does not alter Analytics ability to track your web pages. You need to physically remove the code from the web pages to accomplish this.

You can put in many keywords. Their character lengths will vary.

But keywords put aside for a moment. Why not simply sprucen up on your language skills and learn the art of writing sound SEO copy? This way when you become skilled at it you'll be crafting useful, unique things for the Internet which will naturally rank well in a variety of keywords.

Concentrate on optimising your content. Logically name your web pages. Maximize optimizable web page components such as providing unique keyphrase rich Titles, Meta descriptions etc. Optimize images, videos ... Emphasize important keywords in various ways naturally. Expand your knowledge of the English language. Use anchor links internally focusing web pages you want to enforce. Support your SEO efforts with Social media influences, corporate blogging ...

"And also asking for if i am wrong please make me correct."
I am also asking that if I am wrong then please correct me.
... correct me if I am wrong I'm asking ...
... wrongfully correct ask why me please also I am ...

It seems likely that the search engine is factoring in reviews from Google business listings when displaying results in Google Places searches. This is particularly important for smartphone optimization.

"...if you need any service related the water you can fine here. but i am facing a problem. when i use a new keywrord it going to behaind..."

This type of regurgitated jibberish barely merits an intelligent response.

Link exchanging is a fading grey hat technique.

Directory submissions are a complete waste of time and a pitiful attempt at optimisation.

Videos don't really constitute duplicate content. Duplicate content refers mainly to textual content (paragraphs, headings, captions ...). Video titles and descriptions can be considered duplicate content when overly repetitious. I would not delete the videos but edit the captions describing them instead.

I agree with Lorel - first learn how to write well in English. Then you'll need to understand basic HTML. After that you'll need to learn about important page elements that can be optimised - title, description, anchors, images, paragraphs, headings ...

A low quality link is any link artificially created in an attempt to boost a web page's ranking or PageRank.

"... as your Adsense applications is directly proportional to your traffic which in turn is proportional to the back links you have!" This is not accurate. Traffic and back links have little relation when it comes to attracting human visitors. In most cases, back links generate robot hits.

It's easy. You require to be a human being with a bank account and a web site.

You likely have an excess of poorly constructed useless content that the search engine downgraded. I'm visualizing that you have web pages smothered with ads and essentially of little value to the Internet. Maybe I'm wrong but consider how important your web pages really are to the world.

Probably would not affect PageRank but may affect rankings in the results pages if sharing IP address with unusually high number of spam sites.

I'd consider it a limited multi-search engine. Neat idea.

ya. ok. I have a big doubt you can log into anything successfully.

This is a silly question as a Google PR increase means very little if anything at all when it comes to ranking web pages in the search results. As a result of on-site optimization (which is the real SEO by the way) PR0 web pages can kick the snot out of PR6's vying for the same keyphrase status. Anyone who thinks they are a good optimizers because of the effectiveness of their link building schemes is like a chef who serves frozen dinners.

... yet your profile signature is well written and quite elaborate, something smells fishy here ....

If religions truly desired its practicioners to live free and at peace with the world around them then they would not exist. To live at peace within myself means living in reality and in the moments of the todays. To be free to make my own choices implies trusting my own conscience and ceratinly not some dogmatic and archaic imaginary dictatorship (aka god).

Sounds like a glitch on your end, did you try deleting cookies and cache?

Ads that run in search results only perform much much better than those that appear on search network pertners web pages. False (fraudulent) clicks will eat up your budget fairly quickly with little tangible conversions. Adwords nemesis is Adsense and Adsense is not about conversion at all. It's about generating click throughs for profit, profi for the publisher and profit for the search engine. At your expense!! Simply monitor your keyphrase performance and keep your ads away from greedy publishers.

A couple of options:

SEO Skills Option A

You may want to consider learning how to write well, in English ... provided you wanted to optimize English web pages.

SEO Skills Option B

You may want to train your hands and mind to copy/paste hyperlinks super quickly. That's the tremendous talent most illiterate search engine optimisers acquire. With a honed copy/paste pistol SEO operators can dump links all over the place and pump the crap out of off-site ranking factors. Well, that's the theory. I think the mainstreet notion. But that technique is being less addressed lately ... wonder why .... it's such an an extraordinary pool of SEO talent --> these guru linking strategists PR'sters. When you mature as an SEO operator technician specialist maybe you ... even you can stand proud amongst the greatest anchor scheming popularity illusionists of alllllll time ... IMAGINE THAT?!!?

You ever analyze the backlinks of keyphrase competitors who have a landing page with a PR0 Google Pagerank rating? Often they rank well because of a powerful internal linking structure. A well built and constantly evolving web site that has already established credibility with the search engine can muster up some serious ranking influences internally over time. This applies to all internal links: navigational links, site map web pages, image links and the powerful combination of naturally positioned anchor links throughout paragraph content pointing to relevant main pages.

Not only that, Google doesn't really seem to differentiate much from how it assigns value between internal and external hyperlinks, when it comes to ranking web pages in the search results pages.

It definitely assigns PR value differently by rewarding incoming (external) links with PR value whereas internal links don't seem to get any although they might somehow.

You know, once upon a time forum signatures and forum in general were almost always very useful. There's maybe 100 Purposeful Forums on the entire web and the gazillion rest just dumpgrounds pretending to be like purposeful forums.

To think Google isn't aware of a signature link because it is "no-followed" is like the time I walked to bus stop to get to work but forgot to put my pants on. It didn't matter to me until I noticed. I'm sure others noticed first. I guess I'm off track.

Point is, if a user participates in a meaningful discussion within a forum then it's usefulness to either learning or teaching has more merit than whatever miniscule ranking reward the links in the participator's signature could conjure, if any at all.

Whenever I run into an intelligent appearing spam forum that Google has yet to devalue, it gets blown out by some clever link starved marketer so fast it's hardly recognizable as anything remotely meaningful within a week.

Rename your images logically with words separated by comma such as "brand-name.jpg" and put a little description nearby it as in a caption. This will provide the search engine something intelligible about the logo. It may not rank the logo well but it will at least consider it and offer it in image and search results.

You can also try enhancing the ranking by getting a couple of hyperlinks to the images using Pinterest or similar social media trigger.

It was a sad day for Google Health users when they were told to migrate their personal health data to their competitor's platform. Ludicrous were the Google engineers publically complaining of Microsoft's sad excuse of a health management program completely oblivious to thousands no doubt who were now were faced with their exact predicament.

It's doesn't bother me that Google would want to discontinue their corporate headaches, it's another thing altogether how they sacrifice their users like pawns. That really irks me about google sometimes.

Do no evil ... ya. ok.

An SEO audit should identify the weaknesses in ranking keyphrases (keywords) in the results pages. These could include:

• On site ranking factors ie: web page structure, Title, headings, paragraphs, images, linking structure ...
• Off-site ranking factors ie: incoming links, social media triggers, web hosting credibility ...
• Keyphrase and competition analysis

The search engine doesn't index keywords. It indexes web pages.

I would think a simple answer may be to craft your web pages and their content to revolve around important keyword phrases that you want the search engines to notice.

Actually, from looking at the way you compose forum posts, I have a real hard time believing that any content you write would merit better ranking than an established keyphrase competitor.

What comes to mind is that the content of the aged site hasn't changed in a very long time and you show up offering the search engine fresh content, regularly.

I also have to wonder how important your keywords are. It's feasible that even you could outrank a trusted domain in obscure, rarely searched terms, but probably not easily.

Privacy? Collecting and using sensitive data ia part of what they do. The more information they can gather about user the better they can target them with advertisement. Any evolution that the search engine goes through is based on profit rather than respect for personal data. This has been the pattern since the very beginning and won't likely change any time soon.